Abstract
Background
Following multiple promising investigations into restoration of vision in degenerative retinal disease by implantation of a sub- or epiretinal prosthesis, the step to clinical use in humans is impending. In this study we intended to establish optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA) first in research animals for noninvasive assessment of the condition of the posterior pole of eyes after intraocular implant surgery.
Methods
Three adult cats that had undergone subretinal implant surgery were evaluated by OCT and FA between 1 and 470 days postoperatively. Eight adult cats served as control. In addition histology was performed.
Results
In all three cats OCT demonstrated stable positioning of the implants in the subretinal space during the complete examination period. Transient retinal edema was found in the early postoperative period but decreased during follow-up. The retina over the implants was well attached at all times in cats 1 and 2; however, in cat 3 localized retinal detachment was demonstrated. FA showed intact retinal vasculature over the subretinal implant in high detail without interference from choroidal background fluorescence.
Conclusions
OCT and FA have been fruitfully applied to cats to assess the morphological and circulatory conditions of the neuroretina and of its interface with the subretinal implant. The techniques may therefore provide a tool for objective, noninvasive in vivo evaluation of eyes that have undergone subretinal implant surgery, both in research animals and in humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chow AY, Chow VY (1997) Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina. Neurosci Lett 225:13–16
Chow AY, Packo KH, Pollack JS, Schuchard RA (2003) Subretinal artificial silicon retina microchip implantation in retinitis pigmentosa patients: long term follow-up. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci abstract, annual meeting
Eckhorn R, Stett A, Schanze T, Gekeler F, Schwahn H, Zrenner E, Wilms M, Eger M, Hesse L (2001) [Physiological functional evaluation of retinal implants in animal models]. Ophthalmologe 98:369–375
Gekeler F, Schwahn HN, Stett A, Kohler K, Zrenner E (2001) Subretinal microphotodiodes to replace photoreceptor-function—a review of the current state. In: Doly M, Droy M-T, Christen Y (eds) Vision, sensations et environnement, Irvinn, Paris, pp 77–95
Hill DW, Young S (1975) Infrared angiography of the cat fundus oculi. Arch Ophthalmol 93:131–133
Humayun MS, de Juan EJ, Weiland JD, Dagnelie G, Katona S, Greenberg R, Suzuki S (1999) Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 39:2569–2576
Humayun MS, Prince M, de Juan EJ, Barron Y, Moskowitz M, Klock IB, Milam AH (1999) Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:143–148
Kambara C, Inoda S, Shimizu Y, Tanabe K, Tuckwell HC (2000) [Optical coherence tomographic features after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macular involvement]. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 54:327–330
Kohler K, Hartmann JA, Werts D, Zrenner E (2001) [Histological studies of retinal degeneration and biocompatibility of subretinal implants]. Ophthalmologe 98:364-368
Loewenstein JI, Rizzo JF, Montezuma SR (2002) Implantation of subretinal polyimide in Yucatan pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci abstract, annual meeting
Milam AH, Li ZY, Fariss RN (1998) Histopathology of the human retina in retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:175–205
Pardue MT, Stubbs EB, Jr., Perlman JI, Narfstrom K, Chow AY, Peachey NS (2001) Immunohistochemical studies of the retina following long-term implantation with subretinal microphotodiode arrays. Exp Eye Res 73:333–343
Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, Reichel E, Schuman JS, Duker JS, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG (1995) Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 102:217–229
Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan EJ, Greenburg RJ, Marsh MJ, Klock IB, Milam AH (1997) Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 115:511–515
Schwahn HN, Gekeler F, Kohler K, Kobuch K, Sachs HG, Schulmeyer F, Jakob W, Gabel VP, Zrenner E (2001) Studies on the feasibility of a subretinal visual prosthesis: data from Yucatan micropig and rabbit. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:961–967
Wyatt J, Rizzo JF (1996) Ocular implants for the blind. IEEE Spectrum 33:47–53
Zrenner E (2002) Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 295:1022–1025
Zrenner E, Stett A, Weiss S, Aramant RB, Guenther E, Kohler K, Miliczek K-D, Seiler MJ, Haemmerle H (1999) Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? Vision Res 39:2555–2567
Zrenner E, Gekeler F, Gabel VP, Graf HG, Graf M, Guenther E, Haemmerle H, Hoefflinger B, Kobuch K, Kohler K, Nisch W, Sachs H, Schlosshauer B, Schubert M, Schwahn H, Stelzle M, Stett A, Troeger B, Weiss S (2001) [Subretinal microphotodiode array as replacement for degenerated photoreceptors?]. Ophthalmologe 98:357–363
Acknowledgements
Support of this study was provided by the Keio Gijuku Fukuzawa Memorial Fund for the Advancement of Education and Research and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant 01 IN 502 A. The authors thank Chiaki Kato and Mitsuko Agarie for excellent technical advice. The collaboration with our partners in Stuttgart (IMS and IPE) and Reutlingen (NMI), who delivered the subretinal implants and were helpful in solving many technical problems, is appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Völker, M., Shinoda, K., Sachs, H. et al. In vivo assessment of subretinally implanted microphotodiode arrays in cats by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242, 792–799 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0935-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0935-6