Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“It’s just horrible”: a qualitative study of patients’ and carers’ experiences of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Around 50% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience neurogenic bowel dysfunction (constipation and/or faecal incontinence), reducing quality of life and increasing carer burden. No previous qualitative studies have explored the experiences of bowel problems in people with MS, or the views of their family carers. This study sought to understand ‘what it is like’ to live with bowel dysfunction and the impact this has on people with MS and carers. Using exploratory qualitative methods, 47 semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants recruited from specialist hospital clinics and community sources using purposive and chain-referral sampling. Data were analysed using a pragmatic inductive-deductive method. Participants identified multiple psychological, physical and social impacts of bowel dysfunction. Health care professional support ranged from empathy and appropriate onward referral, to lack of interest or not referring to appropriate services. Participants want bowel issues to be discussed more openly, with clinicians instigating a discussion early after MS diagnosis and repeating enquiries regularly. Bowel dysfunction impacts on the lives of people with MS and their carers; their experience with care services is often unsatisfactory. Understanding patient and carer preferences about the management of bowel dysfunction can inform clinical care and referral pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DasGupta R, Fowler C (2003) Bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Drugs 63(2):153–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackenzie I, Morant S, Bloomfield G, MacDonald T, O’Riordan J (2014) Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the UK 1990–2010: a descriptive study in the General Practice Research Database. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85:76–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coggrave M, Emmanuel A (2010) Neurogenic bowel management. In: Fowler C, Panicker J, Emmanuel A (eds) Pelvic organ dysfunction in neurological disease. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khan F, McPhail T, Brand C, Turner-Stokes L, Kilpatrick T (2006) Multiple sclerosis: disability profile and quality of life in an Australian community cohort. Int J Rehabil Res 29:87–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartlett L, Nowak M, Ho Y (2009) Impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life. World J Gastroenterol 15(26):3276–3282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Porrett T, Cox C (2007) Coping and help-seeking behaviour in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. J Assoc Chart Physiother Women’s Health 101:4–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norton C, Dibley L (2013) Help-seeking for faecal incontinence in people with inflammatory bowel disease. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 40(6):631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazewinkel M, Sprangers M, Taminiau-Bloem E, van der Velden J, Burger M, Roovers J (2010) Reasons for not seeking help for severe pelvic floor symptoms: a qualitative study of survivors of gynaecological cancer. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 117(1):39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Norton C, Thomas L, Hill J (2007) Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 334:1370–1371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan J, Sebepos-Rogers G, Poole-Wilson O, To C, Canavan J, Kariyawasam V et al (2013) Faecal Incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: we don’t ask and they don’t tell. Gut 62(Suppl. 1):A79–A80

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bartlett L, Nowak M, Ho Y (2007) Reasons for non-disclosure of faecal incontinence: a comparison between two survey methods. Technol Coloproctol 11:251–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McClurg D, Beattie K, Lowe-Strong A, Hagen S (2012) The elephant in the room: the impact of bowel dysfunction on people with multiple sclerosis. J Assoc Chart Physiother Women’s Health 111:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S (2010) Bowel problems and coping strategies in people with multiple sclerosis. Br J Nurs 19(4):220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stebbins R (2001) Exploratory research in the social sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 33:77–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stebbins RA (2001) Exploratory research in the social sciences. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W (2003) Analysis: practices, principles and processes. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd, London, pp 199–218

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duncan G, Khoo T, Yarnall A, O’Brien J, Coleman S, Brooks D et al (2014) Health-related QoL in early Parkinson’s disease: the impact of non-motor symptoms. Mov Disord 29(2):195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roach M, Frost F, Creasey G (2000) Social and personal consequences of acquired bowel dysfunction for persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 23(4):263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Pedersen P, Houth J, Olsen T (2000) Functional and neurological outcome of stroke and the relation to stroke severity and type, stroke unit treatment, body temperature, age, and other risk factors: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Top Stroke Rehabil 6(4):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dicianno B, Kurowski B, Yang J, Chancellor M, Bejjani G, Fairman A et al (2008) Rehabilitation and medical management of the adult with spina bifida. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87(12):1026–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson V, Skattebu E, Aamot-Andersen A, Thyberg M (2009) Problematic aspects of faecal incontinence according to the experience of adults with spina bifida. J Rehabil Med 41:506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton C, Dibley L (2012) Understanding the taboos about bladders and bowels. In: Gartley C, Klein M, Norton C, Saltmarche A (eds) Managing life with incontinence. Simon Foundation for Continence, Wilmette, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paquette I, Varma M, Kaiser A, Steele S, Rafferty J (2015) The American Society of Colon and rectal surgeons’ clinical practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 58:623–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coggrave M, Norton C, Cody J (2014) Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases [Review]. The Cochrane Library. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub5

  26. Dohle C, Reding M (2011) Management of medical complications. continuum: lifelong learning. Neurology 17(3):510–529

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tullman M (2016) Symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis. continuum: lifelong learning. Neurology 10(6):142–172

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coggrave M (ed), on behalf of the MASCIP Bowel Management Guidelines Development Group (2012) Guidelines for the management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in individuals with central neurological conditions. http://www.mascip.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CV653N-Neurogenic-Guidelines-Sept-2012.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2017

  29. Buckley B (2006) Its the way you ask that matters: comparison of data relating to prevalence of incontinence aid use from two surveys of people with multiple sclerosis. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 33:26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Corry M, While A (2009) The needs of carers of people with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 23:569–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheung J, Hocking P (2004) The experience of spousal carers of people with multiple sclerosis. Qual Health Res 14(2):153–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to those with MS and their carers for their participation in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesley Dibley.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that the research presented in this manuscript has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards for research (Declaration of Helsinki 1964, amended 2013), and has been approved by the research ethics committee at the lead university.

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from Aims2Cure, supported by the UK Multiple Sclerosis Society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dibley, L., Coggrave, M., McClurg, D. et al. “It’s just horrible”: a qualitative study of patients’ and carers’ experiences of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 264, 1354–1361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8527-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8527-7

Keywords

Navigation