Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The full spectrum of ethical issues in the care of patients with ALS: a systematic qualitative review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dealing systematically with ethical issues in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care requires an unbiased awareness of all the relevant ethical issues. The aim of the study was to determine systematically and transparently the full spectrum of ethical issues in ALS care. We conducted a systematic review in Medline and Google Books (restricted to English and German literature published between 1993 and 2014). We applied qualitative text analysis and normative analysis to categorise the spectrum of ethical issues in ALS care. The literature review retrieved 56 references that together mentioned a spectrum of 103 ethical issues in ALS care. The spectrum was structured into six major categories that consist of first and second-order categories of ethical issues. The systematically derived spectrum of ethical issues in ALS care presented in this paper raises awareness and understanding of the complexity of ethical issues in ALS care. It also offers a basis for the systematic development of informational and training materials for health professionals, patients and their relatives, and society as a whole. Finally, it supports a rational and fair selection of all those ethical issues that should be addressed in health policies, position papers and clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed to identify ways to systematically select the most relevant ethical issues not only in the clinical environment, but also for the development of clinical practice guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The EFNS Task Force on Diagnosis, Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Andersen PM, Abrahams S, Borasio GD, de Carvalho M, Chio A, Van Damme P, Hardiman O, Kollewe K, Morrison KE, Petri S, Pradat P, Silani V, Tomik B, Wasner M, Weber M (2012) EFNS guidelines on the Clinical Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (MALS) revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 19:360–375

  2. Societa Italiana di Neurologia (SIN) Working Group “Bioethics and Neurology” (1995) Ethical issues in the care of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ital J Neurol Sci 16:329–332

  3. Werth JL (2001) Using the Youk-Kevorkian case to teach about euthanasia and other end-of-life issues. Death Stud 25:151–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strech D, Mertz M, Knuppel H, Neitzke G, Schmidhuber M (2013) The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia care: systematic qualitative review. Br J Psychiatry 202:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knuppel H, Mertz M, Schmidhuber M, Neitzke G, Strech D (2013) Inclusion of ethical issues in dementia guidelines: a thematic text analysis. PLoS Med 10:e1001498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McCluskey L (2007) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: ethical issues from diagnosis to end of life. NeuroRehabilitation 22:463–472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen A, Krieger C (2013) Ethical considerations in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol 110:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2008) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  9. Medical Professionalism Project (2002) Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Lancet 359:520–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver D (1993) Ethical issues in palliative care—an overview. Palliat Med 7:15–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications

  12. Lemoignan J, Ells C (2010) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and assisted ventilation: how patients decide. Palliat Support Care 8:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolmsjo I, Hermern G (2003) Conflicts of interest: experiences of close relatives of patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nurs Ethics 10:186–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Calbert J, Campbell J, Russell L, White B, Wilms D (1997) The problems with “heroic measures”: the case of Mr. X. Orthop Nurs 16:63–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baumrucker SJ, Carter G, Morris GM, Stolick M, Sheldon JE, Brothers D (2006) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and physician assisted suicide. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 23:332–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mertz M, Strech D (2014) Systematic and transparent inclusion of ethical issues and recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a six-step approach. Implement Sci 9:184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell JA (1998) Ethical considerations in disease management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-cultural, worldwide perspective. J Neurol 245(Suppl 2):S4–S6 (discussion S29)

  18. Johnston WS, Hoskins K, McCluskey L (2011) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: ethical challenges. Neurology 76:S1–S5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bahus MK, Steen PA, Forde R (2012) Law, ethics and clinical judgment in end-of-life decisions—how do Norwegian doctors think? Resuscitation 83:1369–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baumrucker SJ, Stolick M, Carter GT, Mingle P, Oertli KA, Morris GM (2011) Legal but not always allowed: “physician aid in dying”. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 28:449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Borasio GD, Voltz R (1998) Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 245:717–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ganzini L (2006) Artificial nutrition and hydration at the end of life: ethics and evidence. Palliat Support Care 4:135–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashi H, Oppenheimer EA (2003) ALS patients on TPPV: totally locked-in state, neurologic findings and ethical implications. Neurology 61:135–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirano Y, Yamazaki Y (2010) Ethical issues in invasive mechanical ventilation for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nurs Ethics 17:51–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowland LP (1998) Assisted suicide and alternatives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 339:987–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Russell JA, Williams MA, Drogan O (2010) Sedation for the imminently dying: survey results from the AAN Ethics Section. Neurology 74:1303–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brahams D (1997) UK judge approves death free from mental pain. Lancet 350:1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bedlack RS, Mitsumoto H (2012) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a patient care guide for clinicians. Demos Medical Publishing, USA

  29. Guion L (2010) Respiratory Management of ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Jones and Bartlett Learning

  30. Mitsumoto H (2009) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a guide for patients and families: third edition. Demos Medical Publishing, USA

  31. Oliver D, Borasio GD, Walsh D (2000) Palliative care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (motor Neurone Disease). Oxford University Press, Oxford

  32. Smith RA (2000) Effects of the early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the patient: disadvantages. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1(Suppl 1):S75–S77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eisen A, Mezei MM, Stewart HG, Fabros M, Gibson G, Andersen PM (2008) SOD1 gene mutations in ALS patients from British Columbia, Canada: clinical features, neurophysiology and ethical issues in management. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 9:108–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Emilien G, Ponchon M, Caldas C, Isacson O, Maloteaux JM (2000) Impact of genomics on drug discovery and clinical medicine. QJM 93:391–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Facioli AM, Amorim FF, de Almeida KJ (2012) A model for humanization in critical care. Perm J 16:75–77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tramonti F, Bongioanni P, Fanciullacci C, Rossi B (2012) Balancing between autonomy and support: coping strategies by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 320:106–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meran JG, Hamm M, Ganser A (1996) Patient education—support—help with decisions: ethical aspects in treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Wien Med Wochenschr 146:190–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goldstein LH, Atkins L, Leigh PN (2003) Health-related locus of control: does it change in motor neurone disease (MND)? Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 4:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vertrees SM (2012) Medical humanities, ethics, and disability—one fellow’s confession and transformation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 21:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wicks P, Abrahams S, Leigh PN, Goldstein LH (2007) A rapid screening battery to identify frontal dysfunction in patients with ALS. Neurology 69:118–119 (author reply 119–120)

  41. Perrin KO (2008) Health maintenance across the life span. In: Perrin KO, McGhee J (eds) Quick Look nursing: ethics and conflict. Jones and Bartlett Learning, pp 77–90

  42. Kaufert J, Koch T (2003) Disability or end-of-life? Competing narratives in bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth 24:459–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Poenisch C (1998) Merian Frederick’s story. N Engl J Med 339:996–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hannover Medical School, Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Carl-Neuberg Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    F. Seitzer, H. Kahrass, G. Neitzke & D. Strech

Authors
  1. F. Seitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Kahrass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Neitzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Strech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Seitzer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 235 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 63 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 The full spectrum of ethical issues in the care of patients with ALS
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seitzer, F., Kahrass, H., Neitzke, G. et al. The full spectrum of ethical issues in the care of patients with ALS: a systematic qualitative review. J Neurol 263, 201–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7867-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7867-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation