Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke associated with cervical internal carotid artery occlusion: the ICARO-3 study

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the ICARO-3 study was to evaluate whether intra-arterial treatment, compared to intravenous thrombolysis, increases the rate of favourable functional outcome at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke and extracranial ICA occlusion. ICARO-3 was a non-randomized therapeutic trial that performed a non-blind assessment of outcomes using retrospective data collected prospectively from 37 centres in 7 countries. Patients treated with endovascular treatment within 6 h from stroke onset (cases) were matched with patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h from symptom onset (controls). Patients receiving either intravenous or endovascular therapy were included among the cases. The efficacy outcome was disability at 90 days assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), dichotomized as favourable (score of 0–2) or unfavourable (score of 3–6). Safety outcomes were death and any intracranial bleeding. Included in the analysis were 324 cases and 324 controls: 105 cases (32.4 %) had a favourable outcome as compared with 89 controls (27.4 %) [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.88–1.79, p = 0.1]. In the adjusted analysis, treatment with intra-arterial procedures was significantly associated with a reduction of mortality (OR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.40–0.93, p = 0.022). The rates of patients with severe disability or death (mRS 5–6) were similar in cases and controls (30.5 versus 32.4 %, p = 0.67). For the ordinal analysis, adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, presence of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation, the common odds ratio was 1.15 (95 % IC 0.86–1.54), p = 0.33. There were more cases of intracranial bleeding (37.0 versus 17.3 %, p = 0.0001) in the intra-arterial procedure group than in the intravenous group. After the exclusion of the 135 cases treated with the combination of I.V. thrombolysis and I.A. procedures, 67/189 of those treated with I.A. procedures (35.3 %) had a favourable outcome, compared to 89/324 of those treated with I.V. thrombolysis (27.4 %) (adjusted OR 1.75, 95 % CI 1.00–3.03, p = 0.05). Endovascular treatment of patients with acute ICA occlusion did not result in a better functional outcome than treatment with intravenous thrombolysis, but was associated with a higher rate of intracranial bleeding. Overall mortality was significantly reduced in patients treated with endovascular treatment but the rates of patients with severe disability or death were similar. When excluding all patients treated with the combination of I.V. thrombolysis and I.A. procedures, a potential benefit of I.A. treatment alone compared to I.V. thrombolysis was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D et al (2008) ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI, Dennis M, Cohen G, Murray G et al (2012) The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:2352–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, Sgoifo A, Ponzio M, Sterzi R, Boccardi E, for the SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators (2013) Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 368:904–913

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, Alger JR, Nenov V, Ajani Z, for the MR RESCUE Investigators* et al (2013) A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 368:914–923

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Yeatts SD, Khatri P, Hill MD, for the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators et al (2013) Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 368:893–903

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee KY, Han SW, Kim SH, Nam HS, Ahn SW, Kim DJ et al (2007) Early recanalization after intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activate as assessed by pre- and post-thrombolytic angiography in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 38:192–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Silva DA, Brekenfeld C, Ebinger M, Christensen S, Barber PA, Butcher KS et al (2010) The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis relate to the site of baseline arterial occlusion in the Echoplane Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). Stroke 41:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Caso V, Pieroni A, Bovi P, Cappellari M et al (2012) Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke associated to extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion: the ICARO-2 study. Cerebrovasc Dis 34:430–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paciaroni M, Balucani C, Agnelli G, Caso V, Silvestrelli G, Grotta JC et al (2012) Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and Internal Carotid ARtery Occlusion: the ICARO study. Stroke 43:125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mokin M, Kass-Hout T, Kass-Hout O, Dumont TM, Kan P, Snyder KV et al (2012) Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery occlusion: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Stroke 43:2362–2368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG (2003) Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 34:1324–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, Majoie CB (2004) Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 35:2306–2312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W et al (2007) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 369:275–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bath PM, Gray LJ, Collier T, Pocock S, Carpenter J, the Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials (OAST) Collaboration (2007) Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials. Stroke 38:1911–1915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H et al (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:e109–e137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, Jovin TG, Baxter B, Nogueira RG et al (2012) Solitaire flow restoration device versus the MERCI retriever in patients with acute ischemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomized parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 380:1241–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA et al (2012) Trevo versus MERCI retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomized trial. Lancet 380:1231–1240

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen JE, Rabinstein AA, Ramirez-de-Noriega F, Gomori JM, Itshayek E, Eichel R, Leker RR (2013) Excellent rates of recanalization and good functional outcome after stent-based thrombectomy for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: is it time for a paradigm shift? J Clin Neurosci 20:1219–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Copen WA, Rezai Gharai L, Barak ER, Schwamm LH, Wu O, Kamalian S et al (2009) Existence of the diffusion-perfusion mismatch within 24 hours after onset of acute stroke: dependence on proximal arterial occlusion. Radiology 250:878–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, Molina CA, Garami Z, Calleja S et al (2007) Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 38:948–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo Albert J, Verduzco Luis A, Schaefer Pamela W, Hirsch Joshua A et al (2009) MRI-based Selection for Intra-arterial Stroke Therapy: value of Pre-treatment DWI Lesion Volume in Selecting Acute Stroke Patients Who Will Benefit from Early Recanalization. Stroke 40:2046–2054

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Debrey SM, Yu H, Lynch JK, Lovblad KO, Wright VL, Janket SJD, Baird AE (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease. Stroke 39:2237–2248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Corea F, Ageno W, Alberti A, Lanari A et al (2008) Early hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarction: rate, predictive factors, and influence on clinical outcome: results of a prospective multicentre study. Stroke 39:2249–2256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The study was conducted under the nonfinancial auspices of the Italian Stroke Association. M.P. received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Sanofi-Aventis. G.A. received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer. D.L. has had consultancy roles for and has contributed to advisory boards, steering committees, and adjudication committees for Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novo-Nordisk, Allergan, Bayer, Ebewe, CoLucid Pharma, Brainsgate, Photothera, Lundbeck, and GSK, fees for which were paid toward research at ADRINORD (Association pour le De´veloppement de la Recherche et de l’Innovation dans le Nord-Pas de Calais) or the research account of the hospital (de´le´gation a` la recherche du CHU de Lille). He was reimbursed for travel or accommodation expenses needed for the participation on these boards and committees. He was associate editor of the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry from 2004 to 2010. GT has been supported by European Regional Development Fund—Project FNUSA-ICRC (N. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123). D.T. was paid for expert testimony by Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical standards

The study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Paciaroni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paciaroni, M., Inzitari, D., Agnelli, G. et al. Intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke associated with cervical internal carotid artery occlusion: the ICARO-3 study. J Neurol 262, 459–468 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7550-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7550-1

Keywords

Navigation