Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postictal serum creatine kinase for the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this review was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of postictal creatine kinase (CK) levels in the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). A systematic search was conducted for studies that evaluated postictal CK levels in patients with ES (all types) and PNES. Sensitivity and specificity with 95 % confidence intervals were determined for each study, taking into account: (a) the upper limits adopted; and (b) the 95.7th percentile values, which are recently proposed practical upper reference limits for CK activity. Four studies, comprising a total of 343 events (248 ES and 95 PNES), were available for analysis. Most patients (47/78, 60 %) with ES considered had primarily or secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures. The sensitivity of increased postictal CK levels for ES ranged from 14.6 to 87.5, whereas specificity ranged from 85.0 to 100.0. At the 95.7th percentile threshold, sensitivity ranged from 14.6 to 62.5 and specificity was 100.0. The limited number of studies available, their small sample size, and lack of individual event data prevented further stratification analysis by seizure type. Despite the clinical heterogeneity and the limitations of the included studies, increased postictal CK levels are highly specific for the diagnosis of ES, although no definite conclusion on its role in differentiating between convulsive and non-convulsive ES can be drawn. Postictal serum CK levels can provide valuable retrospective information at the later stages of the differential diagnosis of ES and PNES. Due to low sensitivity, normal postictal CK levels do not exclude ES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benbadis SR, Agrawal V, Tatum WO IV (2001) How many patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures also have epilepsy? Neurology 57:915–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin R, Burneo JG, Prasad A, Powell T, Faught E, Knowlton R et al (2003) Frequency of epilepsy in patients with psychogenic seizures monitored by video-EEG. Neurology 61:1791–1792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brigo F, Nardone R, Bongiovanni LG (2012) Value of tongue biting in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and syncope. Seizure 21(8):568–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brigo F, Nardone R, Ausserer H, Storti M, Tezzon F, Manganotti P et al (2012) The diagnostic value of urinary incontinence in the differential diagnosis of seizures. Seizure 22(2):85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brigo F, Storti M, Lochner P, Tezzon F, Fiaschi A, Bongiovanni LG et al (2012) Tongue biting in epileptic seizures and psychogenic events. An evidence-based perspective. Epilepsy Behav 25:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brigo F, Ausserer H, Nardone R, Tezzon F, Manganotti P, Bongiovanni LG (2013) Clinical utility of ictal eyes closure in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and psychogenic events. Epilepsy Res 104:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cascino GD (2002) Clinical indications and diagnostic yield of video-electroencephalographic monitoring in patients with seizures and spells. Mayo Clin Proc 77:1111–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alsaadi TM, Thieman C, Shatzel A, Farias S (2004) Video-EEG telemetry can be a crucial tool for neurologists experienced in epilepsy when diagnosing seizure disorders. Seizure 13:32–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobesberger J, Walser G, Unterberger I, Seppi K, Kuchukhidze G, Larch J, Bauer G, Bodner T, Falkenstetter T, Ortler M, Luef G, Trinka E (2011) Video-EEG monitoring: safety and adverse events in 507 consecutive patients. Epilepsia 52:443–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyllie E, Lueders H, Pippenger C, VanLente F (1985) Postictal serum creatine kinase in the diagnosis of seizure disorders. Arch Neurol 42:123–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB (1991) Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 44:763–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGee SR (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of physical findings. In: McGee SR (ed) Evidence-based physical diagnosis. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brewster LM, Mairuhu G, Sturk A, van Montfrans GA (2007) Distribution of creatine kinase in the general population: implications for statin therapy. Am Heart J 154:655–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kyriakides T, Angelini C, Schaefer J, Sacconi S, Siciliano G, Vilchez JJ et al (2010) European federation of neurological societies. EFNS guidelines on the diagnostic approach to pauci- or asymptomatic hyperCKemia. Eur J Neurol 17:767–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willert C, Spitzer C, Kusserow S, Runge U (2004) Serum neuron-specific enolase, prolactin, and creatine kinase after epileptic and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Acta Neurol Scand 109:318–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H (2006) Diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic status epilepticus in the emergency setting. Neurology 66:1727–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petramfar P, Yaghoobi E, Nemati R, Asadi-Pooya AA (2009) Serum creatine phosphokinase is helpful in distinguishing generalized tonic–clonic seizures from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and vasovagal syncope. Epilepsy Behav 15:330–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chesson A, Kasarskis EJ (1980) Serum CPK elevation after seizures. JAMA 244:2414–2415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chesson AL, Kasarskis EJ, Small VW (1983) Postictal elevation of serum creatine kinase level. Arch Neurol 40:315–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neufeld MY, Treves TA, Chistik V, Korczyn AD (1997) Sequential serum creatine kinase determination differentiates vaso-vagal syncope from generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Acta Neurol Scand 95:137–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silvestri NJ, Wolfe GI (2013) Asymptomatic/pauci-symptomatic creatine kinase elevations (hyperckemia). Muscle Nerve 47:805–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brigo F (2011a) Refining probability: a simple concept to be considered when interpreting interictal epileptiform discharges in EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol 28:334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brigo F (2011b) An evidence-based approach to proper diagnostic use of the electroencephalogram for suspected seizures. Epilepsy Behav 21:219–222

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical standard

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Brigo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Search strategies for MEDLINE. (DOC 30 kb)

415_2014_7369_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Highlighted in yellow the 18 studies provisionally selected and reasons for exclusions (14 studies excluded, 4 included). (DOCX 203 kb)

PRISMA Checklist. (DOC 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brigo, F., Igwe, S.C., Erro, R. et al. Postictal serum creatine kinase for the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a systematic review. J Neurol 262, 251–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7369-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7369-9

Keywords

Navigation