Skip to main content
Log in

The risk stratification based on the CHA2DS2-VASc may predict the response to intravenous thrombolysis after stroke

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CHA2DS2-VASc score influences the outcome in stroke patients with or without atrial fibrillation (AF). We assessed whether the risk stratification based on the prestroke CHA2DS2-VASc score may predict the response to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in stroke patients. We conducted an analysis on prospectively collected data of 516 consecutive AF and non-AF patients treated with IV thrombolysis. Outcome measures were major improvement (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤8 points from baseline or NIHSS score 0) and deterioration (death or NIHSS ≥1 points from baseline) or no improvement (NIHSS score equivalent to baseline) at 24 h; excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≤1) and unfavorable outcome (mRS score >2) at 3 months. Multivariate analysis showed that ORs for major improvement and excellent outcome were lower in patients with intermediate risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 1) (OR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.16–0.92, p = 0.032; OR 0.10, 95 % CI 0.02–0.56, p = 0.009), moderately high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 2) (OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.19–0.96, p = 0.040; OR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.03–0.76, p = 0.022), and very high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc > 3) (OR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.15–0.65, p = 0.002; OR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.04–0.81, p = 0.026), whereas ORs for deterioration or no improvement and unfavorable outcome were higher only in patients with very high risk (OR 4.26, 95 % CI 1.24–14.65, p = 0.021; OR 9.26, 95 % CI 1.15–74.65, p = 0.037), compared with low risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 0). Low-risk level based on the prestroke CHA2DS2-VASc score was predictor of effective response to IV thrombolysis. Very high-risk level was predictor of failed response, compared with low-risk level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong HJ, Kim YD, Cha MJ et al (2012) Early neurological outcomes according to CHADS2 score in stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur J Neurol 19:284–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ntaios G, Lip GY, Makaritsis K et al (2013) CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and long-term stroke outcome in patients without atrial fibrillation. Neurology 80:1009–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31:2369–2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Cappellari.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM1 (DOC 82 kb)

ESM2 (DOC 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cappellari, M., Bovi, P., Micheletti, N. et al. The risk stratification based on the CHA2DS2-VASc may predict the response to intravenous thrombolysis after stroke. J Neurol 260, 2681–2683 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7064-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7064-2

Keywords

Navigation