Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of multiple sclerosis following clinically isolated syndrome: a 4-year prospective study

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the rate of conversion from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to multiple sclerosis (MS) and to investigate variables predicting conversion in a cohort of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of MS. Patients with a first symptom suggestive of MS in the preceding 6 months and exclusion of other diseases were enrolled in an observational prospective study from December 2004 through June 2007. Conversion from CIS to MS according to both McDonald and Clinically Defined Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) criteria was prospectively recorded until March 2010. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the best predictive factors of conversion from CIS to MS. Among 168 patients included in the analysis, 122 converted to MS according to McDonald criteria whereas 81 converted to MS according to CDMS criteria. The 2-year probability of conversion was 57 % for McDonald Criteria and 36 % for CDMS criteria. Variables at enrolment significantly associated with conversion according to McDonald criteria were age and positivity for Barkhof criteria, and according to Poser’s CDMS criteria, age, positivity for Barkhof criteria and no disease modifying therapy. In this large prospective cohort study the conversion rate from CIS to MS in patients presenting with recent symptoms suggestive of MS was within the range of previous observational studies and lower than that reported in the placebo arm of randomized trials. We confirm the prognostic value of MRI in addition to the previous experimental data on the protective role of disease-modifying therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sastre-Garriga J, Tintore M, Rovira A et al (2003) Conversion to multiple sclerosis after a clinically isolated syndrome of the brainstem: cranial magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and neurophysiological findings. Mult Scler 9(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X et al (2005) Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Lancet Neurol 4(5):281–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck RW, Chandler DL, Cole SR et al (2002) Interferon beta-1a for early multiple sclerosis: CHAMPS trial subgroup analyses. Ann Neurol 51(4):481–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L et al (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13(3):227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tintore M, Rovira A, Arrambide G et al (2010) Brainstem lesions in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 75(21):1933–1938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolino E, Fainardi E, Ruppi P et al (1996) A prospective study on the predictive value of CSF oligoclonal bands and MRI in acute isolated neurological syndromes for subsequent progression to multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60(5):572–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sormani MP, Tintore M, Rovaris M et al (2008) Will Rogers phenomenon in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 64(4):428–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrissey SP, Miller DH, Kendall BE et al (1993) The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. A 5-year follow-up study. Brain 116(Pt 1):135–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F et al (2001) Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomised study. Lancet 357(9268):1576–1582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS et al (2006) Treatment with interferon β-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 67(7):1242–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Comi G, De Stefano N, Freedman MS, et al (2012) Comparison of two dosing frequencies of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with a first clinical demyelinating event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (REFLEX): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 11(1):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M et al (2009) Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 374(9700):1503–1511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rojas JI, Patrucco L, Cristiano E (2010) Oligoclonal bands and MRI in Clinically Isolated Syndromes: predicting conversion time to multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 257(7):1188–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korteweg T, Tintore M, Uitdehaag B et al (2006) MRI criteria for dissemination in space in patients with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 5(3):221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chard DT, Dalton CM, Swanton J et al (2011) MRI only conversion to multiple sclerosis following a clinically isolated syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(2):176–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR et al (1999) The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. Mult Scler 5(4):244–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Solari A, Radice D, Manneschi L et al (2005) The multiple sclerosis functional composite: different practice effects in the three test components. J Neurol Sci 228(1):71–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalkers NF, Bergers L, de Groot V et al (2001) Concurrent validity of the MS Functional Composite using MRI as a biological disease marker. Neurology 56(2):215–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50(1):121–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58(6):840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH et al (1997) Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 120(Pt 11):2059–2069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tintore M, Rovira A, Martinez MJ et al (2000) Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(4):702–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rocca MA, Agosta F, Sormani MP et al (2008) A three-year, multi-parametric MRI study in patients at presentation with CIS. J Neurol 255(5):683–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McAlpine D (1972) Multiple sclerosis: a re-appraisal. In: Acheson ED (ed) McAlpine D LC. The problem of diagnosis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 142–178

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J (2006) Baseline MRI predicts future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 67:968–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Feuillet L, Reuter F, Audoin B et al (2007) Early cognitive impairment in patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13(1):124–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mattarozzi K, Vignatelli L, Baldin E et al (2012) Effect of the disclosure of MS diagnosis on anxiety, mood and quality of life of patients: a prospective study. Int J Clin Pract 66(5):504–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported with an unconditional grant by Biogen Idec and by Department of Neurological Sciences of the University of Bologna. None of the authors received fees for the participation to the study. Authors have ownership of the data. The study was recognized as “no profit” by all ethical committees to whom it was submitted. We thank Yghea CRO for the precious help.

Conflicts of interest

Prof. Roberto D’Alessandro reports no disclosure. Dr. Luca Vignatelli reports no disclosure. Prof. Alessandra Lugaresi is a Biogen Dompé, Merck Serono and Bayer Schering Advisory Board Member. She received travel grants and honoraria from Bayer Schering, Biogen Dompé, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis and Teva and research grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Dompé, Merck Serono, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis. She has also received travel and research grants from the Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla and is a Consultant of “Fondazione Cesare Serono”. Dr. Franco Granella received speaking honoraria from Biogen Idec and travel grants from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Sanofi Aventis and Novartis. He received research support from Biogen Idec and Merck Serono. Dr. Elisa Baldin reports no disclosure. Prof. Maria-Rosalia Tola received research funding from Sanofi-Aventis and compensation for consultancy or speaking from Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Merk serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Susanna Malagù received travel grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Dompé, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis and Teva, honoraria from Bayer Schering and Biogen Dompè and research grants from “Fondazione Cesare Serono”. Dr. Luisa Motti reports no disclosure. Dr. Walter Neri reports no disclosure. Dr. Galeotti reports no disclosure. Dr. Mario Santangelo reports no disclosure. Dr. Laila Fiorani has received travel grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Dompé, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis. Dr. Enrico Montanari reports no disclosure. Dr. Cinzia Scandellari reports no disclosure. Dr. Maria Donata Benedetti reports no disclosure. Dr. Maurizio Leone reports no disclosure.

Ethical standard

In the paper it is well reported that the study was approved by all ethical committees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto D’Alessandro.

Additional information

For the GERONIMUS Study Group (members of this study group are listed in "Appendix").

Appendix: GERONIMUS Coinvestigators

Appendix: GERONIMUS Coinvestigators

Katia Mattarozzi, PhD (Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Bologna, Psycologic testing coordination); Marianna Pattini, MD (Centro Sclerosi Multipla, U.O di Neurologia, Ospedale Civile –Località Vaio, Site investigators); Caterina Senesi, MD (Centro Sclerosi Multipla Dipartimento di Neuroscienze,Università di Parma, site investigator); Concetta Feo, (U.O.S Neurofisiologia, U.O. Neurologia, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, site investigator); Sergio Stecchi, MD; Lucia La Mola; Renzo Balugani, MD (UOSD Riabilitazione-Sclerosi Multipla, Villa Mazzacorati, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, site investigators); Fabio Pizza, MD (Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università di Bologna, site investigator); Laura Delaj, MD; Silvia De Pasqua, MD; Rita Rinaldi, MD (U.O Neurologia, Dipartimento Neuro-Senso-Motorio, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, site investigators); Eleonora Baldi, MD, Luisa Caniatti, MD, Paola Milani, Psychologist (Dipartimento di Neuroscienze,Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, site investigators and psychologic testing); Vittoria Mussuto, MD; Monica Manzoni, Psycologist (U.O. Neurologia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Scaletta, Imola, site investigators); Mario Casmiro, MD; Claudia Guerrini (Ospedale per gli Infermi,AUSL Ravenna, Faenza, site investigators); Laura Mambelli (U.O. di Neurologia, Presidio Ospedaliero G.B. Morgagni-L. Pierantoni, Forlì, site investigator); Paola Naldi, MD; Laura Collimedaglia, Psychologist (SCDU Neurologia, A.O.U. “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, site investigators); Erika Pietrolongo, PhD; Valeria Di Tommaso, MD; Giovanna DeLuca, MD; Daniela Travaglini, MD (Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Imaging, Università “G. d’Annunzio”, Chieti, site investigators and psychological testing); Francesca Rossi, MD; Alberto Gajofatto, MD (Unità Operativa Complessa di Neurologia, Borgo Roma, Verona, site investigators); Marco Pastore Trossello, MD; Luca Faccioli, MD; Luca Spinardi, MD (SSD Neuroradiologia, AOSP, Bologna, MRI review).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Alessandro, R., Vignatelli, L., Lugaresi, A. et al. Risk of multiple sclerosis following clinically isolated syndrome: a 4-year prospective study. J Neurol 260, 1583–1593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6838-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6838-x

Keywords

Navigation