Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-hospital delays in stroke patients treated with rt-PA: impact of preadmission notification

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-hospital notification enhances thrombolysis rate and improves intra-hospital delays, but the impact of the notification to the neurologist by the emergency medical system (EMS) call centre remains unknown. Our objective was to compare pre-hospital and in-hospital delays in stroke patients treated by intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), with and without pre-hospital notification. We compared baseline characteristics and in-hospital delays in stroke patients treated by rt-PA with a high-level notification (call to EMS and EMS–neurologist discussion), a low-level notification (call to EMS without EMS–neurologist discussion ) and no pre-hospital notification. Of 302 consecutive patients [165 women, 54.6 %; median age 74 years, interquartile range (IQR) 59–83], patients with high-level, low-level and no notification differed for the severity at admission (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, respectively, of: 12, IQR 7–17; 9, IQR 6–15, and 8, IQR 6–14, p = 0.029). Patients with high-level notification had shorter (1) admission-to-completion of imaging times (27 min, IQR 14–35) than patients with low-level notification (35 min, IQR 17–54) or no notification (36 min, IQR 30–58) (p < 0.01); (2) door-to-needle times (49 min, IQR 39–62 vs. 57 min, IQR 39–81 vs. 63 min, IQR 51–97; p = 0.003); and (3) onset-to-needle times (140 min, IQR 110–175 vs. 155 min, IQR 106–230 vs. 182 min, IQR 131–234; p < 0.001). They did not differ for onset-to-admission time and imaging-to-needle time. Pre-hospital notification by the EMS reduces intra-hospital delays in patients eligible for rt-PA, but the benefit is higher in the case of discussion between the EMS and the neurologist before admission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, Del Zoppo G, Sandercock P, Lindley RL, Cohen G (2012) Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 379:2364–2372

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Brott T, Frankel M, Grotta JC, Haley EC Jr, Kwiatkowski T, Levine SR, Lewandowski C, Lu M, Lyden P, Marler JR, Patel S, Tilley BC, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Wilhelm M, Hamilton S (2004) Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 363:768–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, Brott TG, Toni D, Grotta JC, Albers GW, Kaste M, Marler JR, Hamilton SA, Tilley BC, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Hacke W, Allen K, Mau J, Meier D, del Zoppo G, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Levi C, Bladin C, Byrnes G (2010) Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 375:1695–1703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Audebert H, Schenkel J, Heuschmann P, Bogdahn U, Haberl R (2006) Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 5:742–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks EF (2007) Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 38:1655–1711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) executive committee (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507. (updated at: http://www.eso-stroke.org/pdf/ESO%420Guidelines_update_Jan_2009.pdf)

  9. Patel MD, Rose KM, O’Brien EC, Rosamond WD (2011) Pre-hospital notification by emergency medical services reduces delays in stroke evaluation: findings from the North Carolina stroke care collaborative. Stroke 42:2263–2268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdullah AR, Smith EE, Biddinger PD, Kalenderian D, Schwamm LH (2008) Advance hospital notification by EMS in acute stroke is associated with shorter door-to-computed tomography time and increased likelihood of administration of tissue-plasminogen activator. Prehosp Emerg Care 12:426–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belvis R, Cocho D, Marti-Fabregas J, Pagonabarraga J, Aleu A, Garcia-Bargo MD, Pons J, Coma E, Garcia-Alfranca F, Jimenez-Fabrega X, Marti-Vilalta JL (2005) Benefits of a pre-hospital stroke code system. Feasibility and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice in Barcelona, Spain. Cerebrovasc Dis 19:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalloz MA, Bottin L, Muresan IP, Favrole P, Foulon S, Levy P, Drouet T, Marro B, Alamowitch S (2012) Thrombolysis rate and impact of a stroke code: a French hospital experience and a systematic review. J Neurol Sci 314:120–125

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bodenant M, Leys D, Debette S, Cordonnier C, Dumont F, Henon H, Girot M, Lucas C, Devos D, Defebvre L, Deplanque D, Leclerc X, Bordet R (2010) Intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischaemia: comparison of outcomes between patients treated at working versus nonworking hours. Cerebrovasc Dis 30:148–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, Hennerici MG, Kaste M, Kuelkens S, Larrue V, Lees KR, Roine RO, Soinne L, Toni D, Vanhooren G (2007) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 369:275–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McKinney JS, Mylavarapu K, Lane J, Roberts V, Ohman-Strickland P, Merlin MA (2011) Hospital prenotification of stroke patients by emergency medical services improves stroke time targets. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.06.018

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strbian D, Soinne L, Sairanen T, Happola O, Lindsberg PJ, Tatlisumak T, Kaste M (2011) Ultraearly thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke is associated with better outcome and lower mortality. Stroke 41:712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikulik R, Kadlecova P, Czlonkowska A, Kobayashi A, Brozman M, Svigelj V, Csiba L, Fekete K, Korv J, Demarin V, Vilionskis A, Jatuzis D, Krespi Y, Ahmed N (2012) Factors influencing in-hospital delay in treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 43(6):1578–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Anne-Marie Bordet for her help in monitoring the data. Funds received from University Lille Nord de France (EA 1046), and Adrinord. Dr Casolla Barbara was funded by a Research Fellowship for Young Investigators, granted in 2011 by the Italian Foundation Umberto Veronesi.

Conflicts of interest

Barbara Casolla, Eric Wiel and Patrick Goldstein: none. Marie Bodenant and Jean-Pierre Pruvo are investigators of DIAS 3 (Lundbeck) and Thrace (French Ministry of Health). Charlotte Cordonnier, Marie Girot, and Didier Leys were investigators of ECASS 3 (Boehringer-Ingelheim), and are investigators of DIAS 3 (Lundbeck) and Thrace (French Ministry of Health).

Ethical standard

All human studies must state that they have been approved by the approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Didier Leys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casolla, B., Bodenant, M., Girot, M. et al. Intra-hospital delays in stroke patients treated with rt-PA: impact of preadmission notification. J Neurol 260, 635–639 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6693-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6693-1

Keywords

Navigation