Skip to main content
Log in

A short Scale for Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: first psychometric approach

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The neuropsychiatric symptoms and behavioral disorders affecting Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients are common and disabling. A PD-specific interview-based 12-item scale, the Scale for Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease (SEND-PD), has been developed to assess the severity of neuropsychiatric manifestations. The present study is aimed at testing some basic psychometric attributes of this scale. A total of 633  consecutive patients and their caregivers were included in this cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study. In addition to the tested scale, the following assessments were applied: Hoehn and Yahr staging, Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease Motor and Psychiatric complications, MiniMental State Examination, Clinical Impression of Severity Index, and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Inventory. Patients in all stages of disease were included and 18.38 % were demented. The SEND-PD was responded by patients (86.16 %), caregivers (13.15 %), or both (0.69 %). Three factors (accounting for 66.63 % of the variance) were identified and considered as subscales: Psychotic symptoms, Mood/Apathy, and Impulse control disorders. The subscales showed satisfactory scaling assumptions (multitrait-item success rate 100 %) and internal consistency (alpha indices >0.70). The convergent validity with other measures of psychiatric symptoms and the discriminant validity to distinguish between categories of patients’ age, duration and severity of disease, and dopaminergic treatment were satisfactory. The precision of the scale dimensions was acceptable. The SEND-PD performed as an acceptable, consistent, valid, and precise scale for evaluation of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T (2009) Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 373:2055–2066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhuri KR, Healy DG, Schapira AHV (2006) Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis and management. Lancet Neurol 5:235–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez-Martin P, Schapira AH, Stocchi F, Sethi K, Odin P, MacPhee G et al (2007) Prevalence of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease in an international setting: Study using nonmotor symptoms questionnaire in 545 patients. Mov Disord 22:1623–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez-Martin P, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Kurtis MM, Ray Chaudhuri K, on behalf of the NMSS Validation Group (2011) The impact of non-motor symptoms on health-related quality of life of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26:399–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park A, Stacy M (2011) Dopamine-induced nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinson Dis. doi:10.4061/2011/485063

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaudhuri KR, Schapira AHV (2009) Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Neurol 8:464–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Schapira AH, Stocchi F, Sethi K, Odin P et al (2006) International multicenter pilot study of the first comprehensive self-completed nonmotor symptoms questionnaire for Parkinson’s disease: the NMSQuest study. Mov Disord 21:916–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnan S, Sarma G, Sarma S, Kishore A (2011) Do nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease differ from normal aging? Mov Disord 26:2110–2113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Papapetropoulos S, Mash DC (2005) Psychotic symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. From description to etiology. J Neurol 252:753–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weintraub D, Burn DJ (2011) Parkinson’s Disease: the quintessential neuropsychiatric disorder. Mov Disord 26:1022–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedberg G, Zoldan J, Weizman A, Melamed E (1998) Parkinson Psychosis Rating Scale: a practical instrument for grading psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 21:280–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandstaedter D, Spieker S, Ulm G, Siebert U, Eichhorn TE, Krieg JC et al (2005) Development and evaluation of the Parkinson Psychosis Questionnaire: a screening-instrument for the early diagnosis of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 252:1060–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Brown RG, Sethi K, Stocchi F, Odin P et al (2007) The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord 22:1901–1911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Visser M, Verbaan D, van Rooden SM, Stiggelbout AM, Marinus J, Van Hilten JJ (2007) Assessment of psychiatric complications in Parkinson’s disease: the SCOPA-PC. Mov Disord 22:2221–2228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins G, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P et al (2008) Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23:2129–2170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ardouin C, Chéreau I, Llorca PM, Lhommée E, Durif F, Pollak P et al (2009) Assessment of hyper- and hypodopaminergic behaviors in Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurol (Paris) 165:845–856 (Article in French)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Virués-Ortega J, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Micheli F, Carod-Artal FJ, Serrano-Dueñas M, Martinez-Martin P (2010) Cross-cultural evaluation of the modified Parkinson Psychosis Rating Scale across disease stages. Mov Disord 25:1391–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandez HH, Aarsland D, Fénelon G, Friedman JH, Marsh L, Tröster AI et al (2008) Scales to assess psychosis in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 23:484–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez-Martin P, Guerrero Diaz MT, Frades-Payo B (2004) Neuropsychological disorders in Parkinson’s disease: evaluating them and their impact on the caregiver. Rev Neurol 39:639–645 (Article in Spanish)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez-Martín P, Forjaz MJ, Frades-Payo B, Bayes-Rusiñol A, Fernández-García JM, Benito-León J et al (2007) Caregiver burden in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 22:924–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marinus J, Visser M, Stiggelbout AM, Martin Rabey J, Martínez-Martín P, Bonuccelli U et al (2004) A short scale for the assessment of motor impairments and disabilities in Parkinson’s disease: the SPES/SCOPA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:388–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martínez-Martín P, Benito-León J, Burguera JA, Castro A, Linazasoro G, Martínez-Castrillo JC et al (2005) The SCOPA-Motor Scale for assessment of Parkinson’s disease is a consistent and valid measure. J Clin Epidemiol 58:674–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-Martin P, Forjaz MJ, Cubo E, Frades B, de Pedro Cuesta J, ELEP Project Members (2006) Global versus factor-related impression of severity in Parkinson’s disease: a new clinimetric index (CISI-PD). Mov Disord 21:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez-Martin P, Rodriguez-Blazquez C C, Forjaz MJ, de Pedro J, on behalf of the Spanish-American Longitudinal PD Patient Study Group (2009) The Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson’s Disease: international validation study. Mov Disord 24:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubois B, Burn D, Goetz C, Aarsland D, Brown RG, Broe GA et al (2007) Diagnostic procedures for Parkinson’s disease dementia: recommendations from the Movement Disorder Society task force. Mov Disord 22:2314–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J (1980) Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 20:649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Overall JE, Gorham DR (1962) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 10:799–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sultzer DL, Levin HS, Mahler ME, High WM, Cummings JL (1992) Assessment of cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia: the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:549–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J (1994) The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 44:2308–2314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE (2010) Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 25:2649–2653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D (1993) Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Res 2:441–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banarjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P et al (2005) Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technol Assess 9:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Linden FA, Kragt JJ, Klein M, van der Ploeg HM, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM (2005) Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1677–1681

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eisen M, Ware JE Jr, Donald CA, Brook RH (1979) Measuring components of children’s health status. Med Care 17:902–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R (1996) How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  40. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  41. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG (2001) A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1204–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shulman LM, Taback RL, Rabinstein AA, Weiner WJ (2002) Nonrecognition of depression and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 8:193–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Goetz CG, Leurgans S, Pappert EJ, Raman R, Stemer AB (2001) Prospective longitudinal assessment of hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 57:2078–2082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ondo WG, Tintner R, Dat Voung K, Lai D, Ringholz G (2005) Double-blind, placebo-controlled, unforced titration, parallel trial of quetiapine for dopaminergic-induced hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 20:958–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schrag A, Barone P, Brown RG, Leentjens AFG, McDonald WM, Starkstein S et al (2007) Depression rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 22:1077–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Leentjens AF, Dujardin K, Marsh L, Martinez-Martin P, Richard IH, Starkstein SE et al (2008) Apathy and anhedonia rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 23:2004–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Leentjens AF, Dujardin K, Marsh L, Martinez-Martin P, Richard IH, Starkstein SE et al (2008) Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 23:2015–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Boer AG, Wijker W, Speelman JD, de Haes JCJM (1996) Quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: development of a questionnaire. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Martinez-Martin P, Cubo E (2007) Scales to measure parkinsonism. In: Koller WC, Melamed E (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Parkinson’s Disease and Related Disorders, Part I, vol 83., 3rd seriesElsevier, Edinburgh, pp 291–327

    Google Scholar 

  51. Martínez-Martín P, Benito-León J, Alonso F, Catalán MJ, Pondal M, Zamarbide I (2004) Health-related quality of life evaluation by proxy in Parkinson’s disease: approach using PDQ-8 and EuroQoL-5D. Mov Disord 19:312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mack J, Rabins P, Anderson K, Goldstein S, Grill S, Hirsch ES et al (2011) Prevalence of psychotic symptoms in a community-based Parkinson Disease sample. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. PMID:21617521

  53. Evans AH, Katzenschlager R, Paviour D, O’Sullivan JD, Appel S, Lawrence AD et al (2004) Punding in Parkinson’s disease: its relation to the dopamine dysregulation syndrome. Mov Disord 19:397–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Weintraub D, Koester J, Potenza MN, Siderowf AD, Stacy M, Voon V et al (2010) Impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 67:589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Djamshidian A, Cardoso F, Grosset D, Bowden-Jones H, Lees AJ (2011) Pathological gambling in Parkinson’s disease—a review of the literature. Mov Disord 26:1976–1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Giovannoni G, O’Sullivan JD, Turner K, Manson AJ, Lees AJL (2000) Hedonistic homeostatic dysregulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease on dopamine replacement therapies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:423–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Weintraub D, Siderowf AD, Potenza MN, Goveas J, Morales KH, Duda JE et al (2006) Association of dopamine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 63:969–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Huang C, Mattis P, Tang C, Perrine K, Carbon M, Eidelberg D (2007) Metabolic brain networks associated with cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 34:714–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R, Burn DJ, Duyckaerts C, Mizuno Y et al (2007) Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 22:1689–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Martinez-Martin P, Falup-Pecurariu C, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Serrano-Dueñas M, Carod Artal FJ, Rojo-Abuin JM, Aarsland D (2011) Dementia associated with Parkinson’s Disease: applying the Movement Disorder Society Task Force criteria. Parkinsonism Rel Disord 17:621–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Poewe W (2003) Psychosis in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov Disord 18(Suppl 6):S80–S87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Weintraub D, Stern MB (2005) Psychiatric complications in Parkinson disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13:844–851

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD (1999) Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 52:861–873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HCW (2009) Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1062–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek ALM (2001) Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 10:571–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by UCB Pharma, Madrid, Spain. The authors acknowledge Pivotal S.L., contracted by UCB Pharma, for their role in the study. The neurologists in the “Appendix 2” contributed to the study by providing the needed data.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. A. Ayuga is employed by UCB Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Martinez-Martin.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Scale for Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease (SEND-PD)

Instructions

Each item is scored from 0–4 according to the severity of the disorder

0. None

1. Mild disorder It is easy to bear. It does not require specific measures.

2. Moderate disorder It entails additional suffering or necessity of care. It requires simple but special measures for management. It starts to be a noticeable part of the clinical picture.

3. Severe disorder It contributes to the disability, requiring supervision or oversight. It requires specific treatment and strong therapeutic measures. It becomes a relevant characteristic of the clinical manifestations.

4. Very severe disorder It stands out as the most important or one of the most important clinical manifestations. It requires specific treatment and vigorous therapeutic measures. It becomes the main subject of treatment and care.

 

Intensity

Psychotic symptoms

 1. Irritability—Aggressiveness: does he/she usually proffer threats or express him/herself in a violent manner?

 

 2. Delusions: does he/she refer ideas of events which are not really happening, such as being cheated or tricked, being a victim of violence or being followed or even chased?

 

 3. Misidentification: does he/she mistake some persons for others, say some person is a different one, or assign false identities to people surrounding him or her?

 

 4. Hallucinations: does he/she perceive things that are not happening or are not real, such as hearing voices, seeing inexistent objects or being touched?

 

Total:

/16

Mood/Apathy

 1. Verbal and social isolation: does he/she engage scarcely in social activities or conversations, express having nothing to talk about, and/or is not sufficiently communicative?

 

 2. Apathy—lack of initiative: does he/she not show interest in initiating, participating in, or finishing tasks or activities?

 

 3. Mental fatigability: does he/she become weary or abandon frequently any mental activity regardless of whether the task entails any excessive effort?

 

 4. Depression: does he/she feel sad, weary, discouraged, hopeless? Has he/she stopped enjoying things previously liked?

 

 5. Anxiety: does he/she feel nervous, restless, distressed or worried without any specific reason? Do unimportant or new things or events cause him/her restlessness and concern?

 

Total:

/20

Impulse control disorders

 1. Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD): does he/she undertake repetitive activities daily without any real need, spend a long time doing it, or feel annoyed and irritated if not allowed or recriminated for it?

 

 2. Impulse-control disorder: Has he/she presented with impulsive behavior, things he/she cannot stop doing, such as: doing excessive or unnecessary shopping, spending lots of time and money in gambling, or exaggerated sexual interest?

 

 3. Dopaminergic drug abuse/addiction: does he/she take medication with a higher frequency or dose than prescribed?

 

Total:

/12

Appendix 2

M Aguado Valcarce; E Agüera Morales; M Álvarez Sauco; JM Arbelo González; M Arias Rodríguez; J Artal Roy; A Ávila; J Balseiro; B Berlanga Morán; M Blázquez Estrada; L Brieva Ruiz; M Bujanda Alegría; I Cabo; A Callén Soto; V Campos Arillo; JA Cárdenas Rodulfo; J Carod; P Casariego; C Castejón Gabriel; MJ Catalán; MÁ Ceballos; E Cebrián; F Coria Balanzat; E Cubo Delgado; T Delgado Ballestero; AM Espino Ibáñez; R Espinosa Rosso; O Fernández Arconada; V Fernández Armayor; Á Fernández Díaz; JM Fernández García; JJ Flores Ruiz; ML Galiano Fragua LS García Andrade; L García Fernández; V García Gil; S García Muñoguren; MJ Garea García-Malvar; A Gil Rodrigo; D Gómez; MJ Gómez Heredia; JMª Gómez Reino; C González Oria; V González Torres; L Gubieras Lillo; J Gutiérrez García; JJ Hernández Regader; EE Hernández Valero; S Huertas Folch; M Huertas Villanueva; B Indakoetxea; J Juni Sanahuja; M Lara Lara; S López Calvo; JM López Domínguez; L Lopez Manzanares; JN Lorenzo Brito; M Llaneza González; MJ Magraner Benedicto; A Malagelada Seckler; J Marey López; S Martí Martínez; S Martín Balbuena; JL Martín Gurpegui; J Martín Polo; A Martínez Gil; I Martinez Torres; V Mateos Marcos; S Mederer; V Medrano; M Menéndez González; P Millet Balanzo; A Mínguez Castellanos; P Modrego Pardo; A Montalbo; O Morsi Hassan; M Moya Molina; M Ochoa; J Olivares Romero; N Ortíz Castellón; A Ortiz Pascual; AM Pascual Lozano; A Pato Pato; R Pego Reigosa; F Pérez Errazquin; V Peset Mancebo; J Prat Rojo; N Pérez; JL Pérez López; MC Pérez Viéitez; A Ponz de Tienda; JM Ramírez Moreno; C Ricart Colomé; A Robledo Strauss; I Rodríguez; N Rodríguez Fernández; A Rojo; J Ruiz Martínez; J Salmero Martínez; A Salvador Aliaga; O Sanchez del Valle; A Sesar Ignacio; MD Sevillano; G Soriano Hernández; A Vadillo Bermejo; and F Vivancos Matellanos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinez-Martin, P., Frades-Payo, B., Agüera-Ortiz, L. et al. A short Scale for Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: first psychometric approach. J Neurol 259, 2299–2308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6490-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6490-x

Keywords

Navigation