Skip to main content
Log in

Pusher syndrome: its cortical correlate

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unilateral stroke can lead to a disorder of postural balance that manifests as a pushing away toward the contralesional side. It is called “pusher syndrome” (PS). The aims of this study were first to assess the anatomical cortical regions that induce PS and second to clarify whether tilt of the subjective visual vertical (SVV)—a sign of vestibular otolith dysfunction—is associated with PS. Sixty-six patients with acute unilateral strokes (28 left-sided lesions, 38 right-sided lesions) were tested for PS, for tilts of the SVV, for hemineglect and for the anatomical lesion site by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based voxelwise lesion-behavior mapping analysis. Our data indicated no significant voxels; however, there was a trend towards an association between lesions of the posterior part of the insula, the operculum and the superior temporal gyrus—key areas of the multisensory vestibular cortical network—and the extent of pushing in patients with right-sided lesions, whereas the rather anterior part of the insula, the operculum as well as the internal capsule reaching to the lateral thalamus seemed to be involved in PS in left-sided lesion patients. These data might point toward a link between the systems responsible for postural control and for processing vestibular otolith information. These findings indicate that vestibular information might be fundamental in right-sided lesion patients for maintaining body posture in space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J (2000) The origin of contraversive pushing. Evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology 55:1298–1304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karnath HO, Johannsen L, Broetz D, Küker W (2005) Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces “pusher syndrome”. Neurology 64:1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johannsen L, Broetz D, Naegele T, Karnath HO (2006) “Pusher syndrome” following cortical lesions that spare the thalamus. J Neurol 253:455–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ticini LF, Klose U, Naegele T, Karnath HO (2009) Perfusion imaging in pusher syndrome to investigate the neural substrates involved in controlling upright body position. PLoS ONE 4:e5737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saj A, Honoré J, Coello Y, Rousseaux M (2005) The visual vertical in the pusher syndrome. Influence of hemispace and body position. J Neurol 252:885–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johannsen L, Fruhmann Berger M, Karnath HO (2006) Subjective visual vertical (SVV) determined in a representative sample of 15 patients with pusher syndrome. J Neurol 253:1367–1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baccini M, Paci M, Nannetti L, Biricolti C, Rinaldi LA (2008) Scale for contraversive pushing: cutoff scores for diagnosing “pusher behavior” and construct validity. Phys Ther 88:947–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fels M, Geissner E (1987) Neglect-Test (NET). Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung visueller Neglectphänomene. Hogrefe-Verlag, Göttingen, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW (1987) Behavioural inattention test. Thames Valley Company, Titchfield, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rorden C, Karnath HO (2010) A simple measure of neglect severity. Neuropsychologia 48:2758–2763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baier B, Bense S, Dieterich M (2008) Are signs of ocular tilt reaction in patients with cerebellar lesions mediated by the dentate nucleus? Brain 131:1445–1454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol 33:292–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilha L (2007) Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rorden C, Fridriksson J, Karnath HO (2009) An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping. Neuroimage 44:1355–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bense S, Stephan T, Yousry TA, Brandt T, Dieterich M (2001) Multisensory cortical signal increases and decreases during vestibular galvanic stimulation (fMRI). J Neurophysiol 85:886–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Thalamic infarctions: differential effects on vestibular function in the roll plane (35 patients). Neurology 43:1732–1740

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dieterich M, Brandt T (1990) Postural imbalance and subjective visual vertical in medullary Infarctions. In: Brandt T (ed) Disorders of posture and gait. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 419–422

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brandt T, Dieterich M, Danek A (1994) Vestibular cortex lesions affect the perception of verticality. Ann Neurol 35:403–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelley BP, Trimble MR (2004) The insular lobe of Reil—its anatomico-functional, behavioural and neuropsychiatric attributes in humans—a review. World J Biol Psychiatry 5:176–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karnath H-O, Broetz D (2003) Understanding and treating “pusher syndrome”. Phys Ther 83:1119–1125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pedersen PM, Wandel A, Jorgensen HS et al (1996) Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation—the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:25–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BA 4097/1-1) to BB. We thank Anja Schröer and the physiotherapists for data assessment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Baier.

Additional information

B. Baier and J. Janzen contributed equally to the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baier, B., Janzen, J., Müller-Forell, W. et al. Pusher syndrome: its cortical correlate. J Neurol 259, 277–283 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6173-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6173-z

Keywords

Navigation