Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the smooth pursuit tests in multiple sclerosis patients

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In multiple sclerosis (MS), randomly located demyelination lesions may involve a large part of the central nervous system and disturb oculomotor activity, including impairment of saccadic and pursuit systems. The aim of the work was to determine the frequency of smooth pursuit disturbances in MS patients and assess the feasibility of various methods for smooth pursuit assessment: the clinical bedside examination and quantitative electrooculographic (EOG) recordings. In addition, we analyzed the effects of age on the results of smooth pursuit tests. Sixty MS patients and 50 volunteers underwent clinical bedside examination and EOG evaluation in a tertiary referral university hospital. EOG recordings of smooth pursuit tests with 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 15 Hz amplitude and gain calculation were preformed. In clinical bedside examination, disorders were found in 25%, and with EOG in 76.6% of patients. In the MS patients and subgroups the mean gain for all frequencies were significantly lower compared with the control group. There were significant differences in gain between younger and older subjects in the control group but no significance in all MS patients their subgroups. Patients with abnormalities in clinical bedside examination had poorer results in EOG tests. There were correlations between gain values and Expanded Disability Status Scale score in MS patients. Smooth pursuit examination provides a valuable parameter of brain dysfunction in MS patients. The EOG test is more useful in detecting subclinical cases than clinical bedside examination, and is not affected by test paradigm or age in MS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amstrong RA (1999) Multiple sclerosis and the eye. Ophtal Physiol Opt 2:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Zee DS, McColl R, Galetta S (2005) The neuroophthalmology of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 4:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Compston C, Coles A (2008) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 372:1502–1517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niestroy A, Rucker JC, Leigh RJ (2007) Neuro-ophthalmologic aspects of multiple sclerosis: using eye movements as a clinical and experimental tool. Clin Ophthalmol 1:267–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Seze J, Vukusic S, Viallet-Marcel M et al (2006) Unusual ocular motor findings in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 243:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams NP, Roland PS, Yellin W (1997) Vestibular evaluation in patients with early multiple sclerosis. Am J Otol 18:93–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alpini D, Caputo D, Pugnetti L et al (2001) Vertigo and multiple sclerosis: aspects of differential diagnosis. Neurol Sci 22:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG (2000) Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 343:935–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes D, McDonald WI (1992) The ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:863–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jozefowicz-Korczynska M, Lukomski M, Pajor A (2008) Identification of internuclear ophtalmoplegia signs in multiple sclerosis patients––saccade test analysis. J Neurol 255:1006–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gagnon D, Paus T, Grosbras MH et al (2006) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of frontal oculomotor regions during smooth pursuit. J Neurosci 26:458–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Müri RM (2006) MRI and fMRI analysis of oculomotor function. Prog Brain Res 15. In: Büttner-Ennever JA (ed) Neuroanatomy of the oculomotor system. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam, pp 503–526

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernes GR (2008) Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movement. Brain Cogn 68:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharpe J, Morrow M (1988) Smooth pursuit disorders. In: Barber HO, Sharpe JA (eds) Physiological and anatomical consideration. Vestibular disorders. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., Chicago, pp 129–158

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morrow MJ, Sharpe JA (1995) Deficits of smooth-pursuit eye movement after unilateral frontal lobe lesions. Ann Neurol 37:443–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanajama R, Nakamura T, Sano R, Ohki M, Okuyama T, Kimura Y, Koike Y (1994) Effect of aging on smooth pursuit eye movement. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 511:131–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jozefowicz-Korczynska M, Pajor A (2006) Smooth pursuit and saccadic tests outcome in healthy persons in different age. Psychiatria Pol 40:775–786

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (1999) The neurology of eye movement, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurtzke JK (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brandt T (2000) Approaching the patients. In: Brandt T (ed) Vertigo. Its multisensory syndromes. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–47

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mastaglia FL, Black JL, Collins DW (1979) Quantitative studies of saccadic and pursuit eye movements in multiple sclerosis. Brain 102:817–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Meienberg O, Müri RM, Rabineau PA (1986) Clinical and oculographic examinations of saccadic eye movements in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 43:438–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reulen JPH, Sanders EACM, Jogenhuis LAH (1983) Eye movement disorders in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. Brain 106:121–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solingen LD, Baloh RW, Myers L et al (1977) Subclinical eye movement disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 27:614–619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Derwenskus J, Rucker JC, Serra A et al (2005) Abnormal eye movements predict disability in MS: two-year follow-up. Ann NY Acad Sci 1039:521–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leigh RJ, Wolinsky JS (2001) Keeping an eye on MS. Neurology 57:751–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Serra A, Derwenskus J, Downey DL, Leigh RJ (2003) Role of eye movement examination and subjective visual vertical in clinical evaluation of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 250:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jozefowicz-Korczynska M, Durko M, Pajor A (2010) Quantitative ocular-motor test analysis in multiple sclerosis. Otolaryngol Pol 64:147–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by Medical University of Lodz, grant no. 502-12-540.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of Lodz, Barlicki University Hospital, 22, Kopcinskiego Str., 90-153, Lodz, Poland

    Magdalena Jozefowicz-Korczynska & Anna Maria Pajor

Authors
  1. Magdalena Jozefowicz-Korczynska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Maria Pajor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Jozefowicz-Korczynska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jozefowicz-Korczynska, M., Pajor, A.M. Evaluation of the smooth pursuit tests in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol 258, 1795–1800 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6014-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6014-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation