Skip to main content
Log in

Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In patients with essential tremor (ET) already treated with chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus ventralis intermedius (VIM) we investigated whether optimization of stimulation parameters could improve clinical tremor suppression, and whether this putative effect could be sustained over time. Twenty-three ET patients with VIM-DBS participated in the prospective study. All electrode contacts were tested systematically and stimulation parameters were optimized over the course of 2 days. Clinical tremor rating scale (TRS) was videotaped before, directly after the optimization and at a 10 weeks follow-up and evaluated blindly and independently by two clinicians. For stimulation effect optimization we increased the number of active contacts whereas the total charge applied to the tissue was kept constant. TRS hemi-body scores decreased significantly after optimization. At the 10 weeks follow-up, however, the improvement had faded and was no longer significant. The activities of daily living (ADL) remained significantly improved. Systematic optimization of VIM-DBS parameters in ET patients leads to a short term improvement which habituates over time. Our results provide further evidence for a tolerance effect in chronic VIM stimulation thereby suggesting that frequently alternating stimulation protocols should be tested in future studies of ET patients treated with VIM-DBS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Gay E, Payen I, Benazzouz A (1996) Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 84(2):203–214. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Limousin P, Speelman JD, Gielen F, Janssens M (1999) Multicentre european study of thalamic stimulation in parkinsonian and essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66(3):289–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Bossuyt PM, Bonsel GJ, van Someren EJ, de Bie RM, Merkus MP, Speelman JD (2000) A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Engl J Med 342(7):461–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hariz MI, Shamsgovara P, Johansson F, Hariz G, Fodstad H (1999) Tolerance and tremor rebound following long-term chronic thalamic stimulation for parkinsonian and essential tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 72(2–4):208–218. doi:10.1159/000029728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koller WC, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, Troster AI, Pahwa R (2001) Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor. Mov Disord 16(3):464–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia Ruiz P, de Igneson MJ, Lopez Ferro O, Martin C, Magarinos Ascone C (2001) Deep brain stimulation holidays in essential tremor. J Neurol 248(8):725–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kronenbuerger M, Fromm C, Block F, Coenen VA, Rohde I, Rohde V, Noth J (2006) On-demand deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a report on four cases. Mov Disord 21(3):401–405. doi:10.1002/mds.20714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fahn (1988) Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Tolosa JJaE (ed) Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 225–234

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rehncrona S, Johnels B, Widner H, Tornqvist AL, Hariz M, Sydow O (2003) Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord 18(2):163–170. doi:10.1002/mds.10309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Randolph JJ (2008) Online kappa calculator. Retrieved March 30, 2010, from www.justus.randolph.name/kappa

  11. Schnitzler A, Munks C, Butz M, Timmermann L, Gross J (2009) Synchronized brain network associated with essential tremor as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Mov Disord 24(11):1629–1635. doi:10.1002/mds.22633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moro E, Poon YY, Lozano AM, Saint-Cyr JA, Lang AE (2006) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation: improvements in outcome with reprogramming. Arch Neurol 63(9):1266–1272. doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.noc60069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients for study participation and cooperation. This study was supported by a grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG), Clinical Research Group 219 (KFO 219) to L.T. and G.R.F (TI 319/2-1, FI 773/8-1 and SCHU 1439/3-1).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael T. Barbe or Lars Timmermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbe, M.T., Liebhart, L., Runge, M. et al. Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression. J Neurol 258, 434–439 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5773-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5773-3

Keywords

Navigation