Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome and consequences according to the type of transient loss of consciousness: 1-year follow-up study among primary health care patients

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prognosis of transient loss of consciousness (LOC) was studied in a one-year follow-up survey. Included were adult patients referred by primary health care physicians for a non-acute specialist consultation during the 2-year period from 01.10.1999 to 30.9.2001. The main outcome measures were recurrence of LOCs during the follow-up, fear of recurrence, injuries, and employment. Altogether, 109 consecutive patients were followed and 39 (36%) suffered a recurrence during the one-year follow-up: 17 (30%) with syncope, 16 (43%) with seizure and six (38%) with uncertain type of LOC. The first ever seizure recurred in 5/9 (56%) during the first year, but only 1 of 17 (6%) first syncope attacks. There was no difference in the recurrence rate if the patient had had previous attacks prior to the index LOC. Injuries, mainly minor, were associated with LOCs in 56% of patients. The risk of injury was highest (83%) with alcohol-related seizures. The unemployment rate was especially high in the seizure group. Fear of recurrence was more common at the beginning than at the end of the follow-up. Conclusions: Seizures recur relatively often, but also recurrent syncope needs more attention—both may cause fear and lead to injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Martikainen K, Seppä K, Viita P, Rajala S, Laippala P, Keränen T (2003) Transient loss of consciousness as reason for admission to primary health care emergency room. Scand J Prim Health Care 21:61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rose MS, Koshman ML, Spreng S, Sheldon R (2000) The relationship between health-related quality of life and frequency of spells in patients with syncope. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1209–1216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barón-Esquivias G, Gómez S, Aguilera A, Campos A, Romero N, Cayuela A, Valle JI, Redondo M, Pedrote A, Burgos J, Martínez A, Errázquin F (2005) Short-term evolution of vasovagal syncope: influence on the quality of life. Int J Cardiol 102:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballesteros J, Duffy JC, Querejeta I, Arino J, Gonzalez-Pinto A (2004) Efficacy of brief interventions for hazardous drinkers in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28:608–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J (2004) Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults; a summary of the evidence for the US preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 140:557–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertholet N, Daeppen J-B, Wielisbach V (2005) Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Arch Intern Med 165:986–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaner EFS, Dickinson HO, Beyer FR, Campbell F, Schlesinger C, Heather N, Saunders JB, Burnand B, Pienaar ED (2007) Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 18(2):CD004148. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bekkelund SI, Albretsen C (2002) Evaluation of referrals from general practice to a neurological department. Fam Pract 19:297–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martikainen K, Rajala S, Seppä K, Viita P, Laippala P, Keränen T (2007) Diagnostic accuracy and specialist consultation patterns upon transient loss of consciousness in primary health care. JPGM 53:277–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Donselaar CA, Geerts AT, Meulstee J, Habbema JDF, Staal A (1989) Reliability of the diagnosis of a first seizure. Neurology 39:267–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoefnagels WAJ, Padberg GW, Overweg J, van der Velde EA, Roos RAC (1991) Transient loss of consciousness: the value of the history for distinguishing seizure from syncope. J Neurol 238:39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Antono B, Dupuis G, St-Jean K, Lévesque K, Nadeau R, Guerra P, Thibault B, Kus T (2009) Prospective evaluation of psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in recurrent vasovagal and unexplained syncope. J Psychosom Res 67:213–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berg AT, Shinnar S (1991) The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology 41:965–972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Carballo D, Slama S, Rajeswaran A, Metzger JT, Lovis C, Unger PF, Junod AF (2001) Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study. Am J Med 111:177–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Medical Research Fund of Tampere. We thank our colleague Kaija Lehtinen for participating in clinical examinations of the study patients and research nurse Marjaana Leinonen for assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsti K. Martikainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martikainen, K.K., Seppä, K., Viita, P.M. et al. Outcome and consequences according to the type of transient loss of consciousness: 1-year follow-up study among primary health care patients. J Neurol 258, 132–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5687-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5687-0

Keywords

Navigation