Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life in survivors after cervical artery dissection

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Little data exists about longterm outcome, quality of life (QOL) and its predictors after spontaneous cervical artery dissections (sCAD).

Methods

Clinical and radiological data of 114 patients with sCAD were collected prospectively. Six patients died within 3 months, the remaining 108 were contacted after a mean of 1498 days (range: 379–3455), 99 survivors (92 %) replied. QOL, assessed with the stroke-specific QOL scale (SSQOL), and functional abilities, measured with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared, and predictors of QOL were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with ischemic stroke, those with isolated local symptoms or transient ischemic symptoms and those without significant disabilities (mRS 0–1) at follow-up.

Results

Seventy-one of 99 patients (72 %) had no significant disability, but only 53 (54 %) reported a good QOL (SS-QOL ≥ 4). Compared to the self-rated premorbid QOL of all patients, SS-QOL was impaired after sCAD (p < 0.001); impairment of QOL was observed in patients with ischemic stroke (p < 0.001), in patients with isolated local or transient ischemic symptoms (p < 0.038) and those without significant disabilities at follow-up (p = 0.013). Nevertheless, low mRS was associated with better overall QOL (Kendall’s tau > 0.5). High National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score on admission and higher age were independent predictors of impaired QOL (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

QOL is impaired in almost half of long-term survivors after sCAD, even in patients with local or transient symptoms or without functional disability. Impairment of QOL is a surprisingly frequent long-term sequela after sCAD and deserves attention as an outcome measure in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leys D, Bandu L, Henon H, Mounier- Vehier F, Rondepierre P, Godefroy O (2002) Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology 59:26–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biousse V, D’Anglejan-Chatillon J, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P, Bousser MG (1995) Time course of symptoms in extracranial carotid artery dissections. A series of 80 patients. Stroke 26:235–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold M, Cumurciuc R, Stapf C, Favrole P, Berthet K, Bousser MG (2006) Pain as the only symptom of cervical artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1021–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arauz A, Hoyos L, Espinoza C, Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F, Roman G (2006) Dissection of cervical arteries: long-term follow-up study of 130 consecutive cases. Cerebrovasc Dis 22:150–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee VH, Brown RD, Mandrekar JN, Mokri B (2006) Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population- based study. Neurology 67:1809–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasner SE, Hankins LL, Bratina P, Morgenstern LB (1997) Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrates vascular healing of carotid and vertebral artery dissections. Stroke 28:1993–1997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Auer A, Felber S, Schmidauer C, Waldenberger P, Aichner F (1998) Magnetic resonance angiographic and clinical features of extracranial vertebral artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:474–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Provenzale JM, Morgenlander JC, Gress D (1996) Spontaneous vertebral dissection: clinical, conventional angiographic, CT, and MRI findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:185–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mokri B (1990) Traumatic and spontaneous extracranial internal carotid artery dissections. J Neurol 237:356–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baumgartner RW, Arnold M, Baumgartner I, Mosso M, Gonner F, Studer A, Schroth G, Schuknecht B, Sturzenegger M (2001) Carotid dissection with and without ischemic events. Neurology 57:827–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 8(Suppl 7):1–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition (2004) Cephalalgia24(Suppl 1):1–160

  13. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Roorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:846–870

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J (1999) Development of a Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Stroke 30:1362–1369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Merino JG, Lattimore SU, Warach S (2005) Telephone assessment of stroke outcome is reliable. Stroke 36:232–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer U, Anca D, Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Kappeler L, Ballinari P, Schroth G, Mattle HP (2008) Quality of life in stroke survivors after local intraarterial thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 25(5):438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bassetti C, Caruzzo A, Sturzenegger M, Tuncdogan E (1996) Recurrence of cervical artery dissection. A prospective study of 81 patients. Stroke 27:1804–1807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leys D, Debette S (2006) Long-term outcome in patients with cervicalartery dissections: there is still a lot to know. Cerebrovasc Dis 22:215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Czechowsky D, Hill MD (2002) Neurological outcome and quality of life after stroke due to vertebral artery dissection. Cerebrovasc Dis 13:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G, Fischer U, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J, Benninger D, Sturzenegger M, Mattle HP, Baumgartner RW (2006) Vertebral artery dissection. Presenting findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke 37:2499–2503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P (1997) Are Proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke 28:1883–1887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams LS, Bakas T, Brizendine E, Plue L, Tu W, Hendrie H, Kroenke K (2006) How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients’ healthrelated quality of life? Stroke 37:2081–2085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomassen L, Waje-Andreassen U, Naess H, Elvik MK, Russell D (2005) Long-term effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke: responder analysis versus uniform analysis of excellent outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 20:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nedeltchev K, Fischer U, Arnold M, Ballinari P, Haefeli T, Kappeler L, Brekenfeld C, Remonda L, Schroth G, Heinrich PM (2006) Long-term effect of intraarterial thrombolysis in stroke. Stroke 37:3002–3007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 4, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    U. Fischer MD, I. Ledermann MS, K. Nedeltchev MD, N. Meier MD, M. Sturzenegger MD, H. P. Mattle MD & M. Arnold MD

  2. Dept. of Neuroradiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    J. Gralla MD, MSc

Authors
  1. U. Fischer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Ledermann MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Nedeltchev MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Meier MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Gralla MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Sturzenegger MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. P. Mattle MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Arnold MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Arnold MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, U., Ledermann, I., Nedeltchev, K. et al. Quality of life in survivors after cervical artery dissection. J Neurol 256, 443–449 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-0112-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-0112-2

Key words

Search

Navigation