Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somatosensory stimulation enhances aspects of motor function in patients with chronic, predominantly subcortical infarcts. We investigated the effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in stroke patients with predominantly cortical involvement in the middle cerebral artery territory in a double-blind, pseudorandomized crossover trial. Motor performance was evaluated with the Jebsen-Taylor test before, after 2-hour somatosensory stimulation, and after subsequent motor training (n = 11). In one experimental session, patients were submitted to median nerve stimulation (MNS) and in the other session, to control stimulation (CS). The order of the sessions was counterbalanced across patients. Improvement in performance in the Jebsen-Taylor test after somatosensory stimulation and after motor training was significantly greater in the MNS session than in the CS session. Additionally, patients who received MNS in the second session maintained the beneficial effects of training 30 days later. A single MNS session improves hand motor function in patients with chronic cortico-subcortical strokes and appears to favor consolidation of training effects. Somatosensory stimulation may be an adjuvant tool for stroke rehabilitation in patients with cortical lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calautti C, Baron JC (2003) Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 34:1553–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG (2002) Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol 51:122–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobkin BH (2003) Do electrically stimulated sensory inputs and movements lead to long-term plasticity and rehabilitation gains? Curr Opin Neurol 16:685–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, Tyrell P, Hobson A, Williams S, Thompson D (2002) Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 34:831–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hackel ME, Wolfe GA, Bang SM, Canfield JS (1992) Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function. Phys Ther 72:373–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50:311–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaelin-Lang A, Luft AR, Sawaki L, Burstein AH, Sohn YH, Cohen LG (2002) Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol 540:623–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luft AR, Waller S, Forrester L, Smith GV, Whitall J, Macko RF, Schulz JB, Hanley DF (2004) Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 21:924–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reding MJ, Potes E (1988) Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke 19:1354–1358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, Pitcher JB, Thompson PD (2000) Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 131:135–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawaki L, Wu CW, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG (2006) Effects of somatosensory stimulation on use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke. Stroke 37:246–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiplady B, Jackson SH, Maskrey VM, Swift CG (1998) Validity and sensitivity of visual analogue scales in young and older healthy subjects. Age Ageing 27:63–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uy J, Ridding MC, Hillier S, Thompson PD, Miles TS (2003) Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? Neurology 61:982–984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG (2006) Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Bastos Conforto.

Additional information

Received in revised form: 2 August 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conforto, A.B., Cohen, L.G., Santos, R.L.d. et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. J Neurol 254, 333–339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0364-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0364-z

Keywords

Navigation