Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Dermatomyositis- and Polymyositis

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 September 2007

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate prospectively contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients suspected of having dermatomyositis or polymyositis.

Methods

In 35 patients (23 women, 12 men; mean age, 51 years ± 16 years) who were suspected of having dermatomyositis or polymyositis, perfusion in clinically affected skeletal muscles was quantified with contrast-enhanced intermittent power Doppler ultrasound. By applying a modified model that analyzed the replenishment kinetics of microbubbles, the perfusion-related parameters blood flow, local blood volume and blood flow velocity were measured. Findings were compared with muscle biopsy appearances and with the results of MRI that was performed with a 1.5-Tesla unit. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed and optimum thresholds for diagnosis of myositis were determined.

Results

Eleven patients had histologically confirmed dermatomyositis or polymyositis and showed significantly higher blood flow velocity (P = .01 for dermato- and P < .001 for polymyositis), blood flow (P < .001 for dermato- and polymyositis), and blood volume (P = .007 for dermato- and P < .001 for polymyositis) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound than those who did not have myositis. An increase in signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images was found in all patients with myositis. MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predicting values (NPV) of 100%, 88%, 77%, and 100% for diagnosis of myositis, respectively. CEUS blood flow was the best ultrasound measure for diagnosis of dermato- or polymyositis with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 73%, 91%, 80%, and 88%, respectively.

Conclusions

Increased skeletal muscle perfusion measured by CEUS could serve as an additional measurer for the diagnosis of an inflammatory myopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a.u.:

Arbitrary units

B :

CEUS-derived local blood volume [∼ml]

CEUS:

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

CK:

Creatine kinase

CP:

Color pixels

CT:

Computed tomography

d :

Ultrasound beam width

DM:

Dermatomyositis

f :

CEUS-derived blood flow [∼ml/min/100 g tissue]

IBM:

Inclusion-body myositis

m:

Slope of the replenishment curve

max:

Plateau of the replenishment curve

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

MI:

Mechanical index

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PM:

Polymyositis

ROI:

Region of interest

SD:

Standard deviation

STIR:

Short tau inversion recovery

U:

Units

US:

Ultrasound

v :

CEUS-derived blood flow velocity [mm/s]

References

  1. Agresti A, Caffo B (2000) Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions results from adding two successes and two failures. Am Stat 54:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bamber D (1975) The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J Math Psychol 12:387–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalakas MC, Hohlfeld R (2003) Polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Lancet 362:971–982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dion E, Cherin P, Payan C, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for distinguishing between inclusion body myositis and polymyositis. J Rheumatol 29:1897–1906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia J (2000) MRI in inflammatory myopathies. Skeletal Radiol 29:425–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg SA, Amato AA (2004) Uncertainties in the pathogenesis of adult dermatomyositis. Curr Opin Neurol 17:359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern AL (1999) Minimally Selected p and Other Tests for a Single Abrupt Changepoint in a Binary Sequence. Biometrics 55:1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krix M, Kiessling F, Farhan N, et al. (2003) A multi-vessel model describing replenishment kinetics of ultrasound contrast agent for quantification of tissue perfusion. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1421–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krix M, Weber MA, Krakowski-Roosen H, et al. (2005) Assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 24:431–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundberg IE, Dastmalchi M (2002) Possible pathogenic mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 28:799–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maillard SM, Jones R, Owens C, et al. (2004) Quantitative assessment of MRI T2 relaxation time of thigh muscles in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology 43:603–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mastaglia FL, Garlepp MJ, Phillips BA, Zilko PJ (2003) Inflammatory myopathies: clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Muscle Nerve 27:407–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. May DA, Disler DG, Jones EA, Balkissoon AA, Manaster BJ (2000) Abnormal signal intensity in skeletal muscle at MR imaging: patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics 20 Spec No:S295–315

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connell MJ, Powell T, Brennan D, Lynch T, McCarthy CJ, Eustace SJ (2002) Whole-body MR imaging in the diagnosis of polymyositis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:967–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park JH, Olsen NJ (2001) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with inflammatory myopathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep 3:334–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peetrons P (2002) Ultrasound of muscles. Eur Radiol 12:35–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pepe MS (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. R Development Core Team (2005) R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  20. Reimers CD, Finkenstaedt M (1997) Muscle imaging in inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 9:475–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schweitzer ME, Fort J (1995) Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging in evaluating polymyositis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1469–1471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott DL, Kingsley GH (2004) Use of imaging to assess patients with muscle disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:678–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber MA, Krakowski-Roosen H, Delorme S, et al. (2006) Relationship of skeletal muscle perfusion measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to histologic microvascular density. J Ultrasound Med 25:583–591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber MA, Krix M, Jappe U, et al. (2006) Pathologic skeletal muscle perfusion in patients with myositis: Detection with quantitative contrast-enhanced US - Initial results. Radiology 238: 640–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba DM, Kaul S (1998) Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97:473–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yosipovitch G, Beniaminov O, Rousso I, David M (1999) STIR magnetic resonance imaging: a noninvasive method for detection and follow-up of dermatomyositis. Arch Dermatol 135:721–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Saida Zoubaa, MD, Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, for reviewing the muscle biopsy samples and reviewing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc-André Weber.

Additional information

Received in revised form: 6 June 2006

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-007-0704-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, MA., Jappe, U., Essig, M. et al. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Dermatomyositis- and Polymyositis. J Neurol 253, 1625–1632 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0318-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0318-5

Keywords

Navigation