Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Brother-brother or father-son? How a dropout of AmelX may facilitate the elucidation of a familial relationship

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Jobling MA, Gill P (2004) Encoded evidence. DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet 5(10):739–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler JM (2007) Short tandem repeat typing technologies used in human identity testing. BioTechniques 43(4):Sii–SSv. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips C, Gettings KB, King JL, Ballard D, Bodner M, Borsuk L, Parson W (2018) “The devil’s in the detail”. Release of an expanded, enhanced and dynamically revised forensic STR sequence guide. Forensic science international. Genetics 34:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumache R, Ciocan V, Muresan C et al (2016) Molecular DNA analysis in forensic identification. Clin Lab 62(1–2):245–248. https://doi.org/10.5772/63530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziętkiewicz E, Witt M, Daca P, Żebracka-Gala J, Goniewicz M, Jarząb B, Witt M (2012) Current genetic methodologies in the identification of disaster victims and in forensic analysis. J Appl Genet 53(1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-011-0068-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roeper A, Reichert W, Mattern R (2007) The Achilles tendon as a DNA source for STR typing of highly decayed corpses. Forensic Sci Int 173(2–3):103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh PS (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10(4):134–139. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan KM, Mannucci A, Kimpton CP et al. (1993) A rapid and quantitative DNA sex test. Fluorescence-based PCR analysis of X-Y homologous gene amelogenin. BioTechniques 15(4): 636–638, 640–1

  9. Zajac BK, Zehner R, Scheiper S, Weissenberger M (2018) Kit-dependent discrepancy in D16S539 and general considerations for database matches. Forensic science international. Genetics 34:148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X. molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill P, Phillips C, McGovern C, Bright JA, Buckleton J (2012) An evaluation of potential allelic association between the STRs vWA and D12S391. Implications in criminal casework and applications to short pedigrees. Forensic science international. Genetics 6(4):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connor KL, Tillmar AO (2012) Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis. Forensic science international Genetics 6(6):840–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.03.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch-Institut R (2013) Richtlinie der Gendiagnostik-Kommission (GEKO) für die Anforderungen an die Durchführung genetischer Analysen zur Klärung der Abstammung und an die Qualifikation von ärztlichen und nichtärztlichen Sachverständigen gemäß 23 Abs. 2 Nr. 4 und Nr. 2b GenDG (The Genetic Engineering Commission (GEKO) according to the requirements for carrying out genetic analyzes to clarify the origin and the qualifications of medical and non-medical experts 23 para 2 No. 4 and No. 2b GenDG Directive). Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 56(1):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1575-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kayser M (2017) Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA. A general overview. Hum Genet 136(5):621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1776-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maciejewska A, Pawłowski R (2009) A rare mutation in the primer binding region of the amelogenin X homologue gene. Forensic science international. Genetics 3(4):265–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ou X, Chen W, Chen H, Zhao F, Zheng J, Tong D, Chen Y, Chen A, Sun H (2012) Null alleles of the X and Y chromosomal amelogenin gene in a Chinese population. Int J Legal Med 126(4):513–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0594-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shadrach B, Commane M, Hren C, Warshawsky I (2004) A rare mutation in the primer binding region of the amelogenin gene can interfere with gender identification. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 6(4):401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60538-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Caratti S, Voglino G, Cirigliano V, Ghidini A, Taulli R, Torre C, Robino C (2009) Amplification failure of the amelogenin gene (AMELX) caused by a primer binding site mutation. Prenat Diagn 29(12):1180–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alves C, Coelho M, Rocha J, Amorim A (2006) The amelogenin locus displays a high frequency of X homologue failures in São Tomé Island (West Africa). Int Congr Ser 1288:271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.10.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Forensic Medicine and Traffic Medicine, Department for Forensic Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Barbara Karolina Zajac, Tina Jenewein & Melanie Weissenberger

  2. Institute of Legal Medicine, Department for Forensic Biology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    Stefanie Scheiper & Richard Zehner

Authors
  1. Barbara Karolina Zajac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Scheiper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Zehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tina Jenewein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melanie Weissenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Karolina Zajac.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Prior to the investigation, written informed consent was obtained from the presumed biological brother to use the samples for research purposes.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zajac, B.K., Scheiper, S., Zehner, R. et al. Brother-brother or father-son? How a dropout of AmelX may facilitate the elucidation of a familial relationship. Int J Legal Med 134, 1305–1310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02084-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02084-3

Search

Navigation