Skip to main content
Log in

Cranium asymmetry in a modern Greek population sample of known age and sex

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate and quantify cranium asymmetry, sexual differences in the set of individual asymmetry scores, and the relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and age, in a modern Greek population sample. In addition, we test for the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis by assessing the correlation between fluctuating asymmetry and cause of death. The study sample consisted of 173 crania of known sex and adult age (92 males, 81 females) belonging to individuals who lived in Greece during the twentieth century. The three-dimensional coordinates of 77 ectocranial landmarks were digitized using a Microscribe 3DX contact digitizer and landmark configurations were analyzed using the generalized least-squares Procrustes method. Regarding directional asymmetry, the results show that the human skull has a tendency for a left-side excess for the Greek population. No significant directional asymmetry differences between the sexes are found. The highest levels of fluctuating asymmetry for both sexes are located on the skull base. The levels of fluctuating asymmetry in all cranial regions appear higher for males than females. Nevertheless, these differences do not present any statistical significance between sexes. Additionally, there is no relationship between fluctuating asymmetry scores and age for both males and females. Finally, the results of this study could not confirm that early development has a significant impact on adult health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enlow DH, Hans MG (1996) Essentials of facial growth. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enlow DH (2000) Normal craniofacial growth. In: Cohen MM, MacLean RE (eds) Craniosynostosis: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 454–472

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gawlikowska A (2010) Ontogeny and phylogeny of the skull. Roczniki- Pomorska Akademia Medycznej W Szczecinie 56(2):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bastir M, Rosas A, O’Higgins P (2006) Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull. J Anat 209(5):637–654

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hahn DS, Fanghänel J, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nägerl H, Hanschke M (1999) Interpretation of the vertical and longitudinal growth of the human skull. Ann Anat 181(1):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Polak M (2003) Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Møller AP, Swaddle JP (1997) Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klingenberg CP (2010) Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat Rev Genet 11(9):623–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham JH, Raz S, Nevo E, Hel-Or H (2010) Fluctuating asymmetry: methods, theory, and applications. Symmetry 2(2):466–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klingenberg CP (2003) A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models and mechanisms. In: Polak M (ed) Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 14–34

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saucede T, Alibert P, Laurin B, David B (2006) Environmental and ontogenetic constraints on developmental stability in the spatangoid sea urchin Echinocardium (Echinoidea). Biol J Linn Soc 88(2):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lens LS, Van DS, Kark S, Matthysen E (2002) Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of fitness: can we bridge the gap between studies? Biol Rev 77:27–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinz GW, Clunie DA, Mullaney PB (1998) The effect of buphthalmos on orbital growth in early childhood: increased orbital soft tissue volume strongly correlates with increased orbital volume. J AAPOS 2(1):39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clauster L, Sarti E, Dallera V, Galie M (2004) Integrated reconstructive strategies for treating the anophthalmic orbit. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 32(5):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu CC, Wong FH, Lo LJ, Chen YR (2004) Craniofacial deformity in patients with uncorrected congenital muscular torticollis: an assessment from three-dimensional computed tomography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(1):24–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Auffray JC, Debat V, Alibert P (1999) Shape asymmetry and developmental stability. In: Chaplain MAJ (ed) On growth and form. Spatio temporal pattern formation in biology. John Wiley & sons, Chiesester, pp 309–324

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS (1998) Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52(5):1363–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A, Wainwright P (2002) Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56(10):1909–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stige LC, David B, Alibert P (2006) On hidden heterogeneity in directional asymmetrycan systematic bias be avoided? J Evol Biol 19:492–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bookstein FL (1996) Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, Series A, Life Sciences 284:131

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mardia KV, Bookstein FL, Moreton IJ (2000) Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika Cambridge 87:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kent M (2001) Shape, Procrustes tangent projections and bilateral symmetry. Biometrika 88(2):469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah SM, Joshi MR (1978) An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod 48(2):141–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chebib FS, Chamma AM (1981) Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod 51(3):214–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farkas LG, Cheung G (1981) Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 51(1):70–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R (2003) Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod 4:381–385

    Google Scholar 

  27. DeLeon VB (2007) Fluctuating asymmetry and stress in a medieval Nubian population. Am J Phys Anthropol 132(4):520–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Taneja VK, Kumar GA, Farishta S, Minocha RC, Baiju G, Gopal D (2012) An assessment of skeletal craniofacial asymmetry in South Indian Population. J Contemp Dent Pract 13(1):80–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weisensee KE (2013) Assessing the relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and cause of death in skeletal remains: a test of the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Am J Hum Biol 25:411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barker DJP, Osmond C, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG (2009) Growth and chronic disease: findings in the Helsinki Birth Cohort. Ann Hum Biol 36:445–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Syddall HE, Aihie-Sayer A, Simmonds SJ, Osmond C, Cox V, Dennison EM, Barker DJP, Cooper C (2005) Birth weight, infant weight gain, and cause-specific mortality: the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 161:1074–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eliopoulos C, Lagia A, Manolis S (2007) A modern, documented human skeletal collection from Greece. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 58(3):221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010) Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a central European sample of known sex. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 61(1):16–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 55(3):213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA (2012) Human osteology. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bookstein FL (2002) Corpus callosum shape and neuropsychological deficits in adult males with heavy fetal alcohol exposure. Neuroimage 15(1):233–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rohlf FJ (1996) Morphometrics spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (eds) Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York, pp 117–129

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Snow FJ (2004) Geometric morphometry analysis of the scapula: implications for the determination of sex and ancestry. University of Tennessee, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  39. Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann Rev Ecol Systematics 17(1):391–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bookstein FL (1997) Morphometric tools for landmark data geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  42. Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11(2):353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gundara N, Zivanovic S (1968) Asymmetry in east African skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 28(3):331–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jain KK, Jain BK (1979) Asymmetry in the skull. Cells Tissues Organs 104(3):349–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Myslobodsky MS, Ingraham LJ, Weinberger DR (1987) Skull asymmetry and handedness in adults: a possibility of their association with lateral head turning in infancy. Percept Mot Skills 65(2):415–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Plochocki JH (2002) Directional bilateral asymmetry in human sacral morphology. Int J Osteoarchaeology 12:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Woo TL (1931) On the asymmetry of the human skull. Biometrika 22(3-4):324–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hershkovitz I, Ring B, Kobyliansky E (1992) Craniofacial asymmetry in Bedouin adults. Am J Hum Biol 4(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Seiji F, Moreira RS, De Angelis MA, Smith Chairman RL (2009) Orbital asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Orbit 28:342–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gawlikowska A, Dabrowski P, Szczurowski J, Staniowski T (2013) Analysis of interaction between nutritional and developmental instability in mediaeval population in Wrocław. Anthropol Rev 76(1):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gawlikowska A, Szczurowski J, Czerwinski F, Miklaszewska D, Adamiec E, Dzieciolowska E (2007) The fluctuating asymmetry of mediaeval and modern human skulls. HOMO - J Com Hum Biol 58(2):159–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria-Eleni Chovalopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chovalopoulou, ME., Papageorgopoulou, C. & Bertsatos, A. Cranium asymmetry in a modern Greek population sample of known age and sex. Int J Legal Med 131, 803–812 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1430-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1430-4

Keywords

Navigation