Skip to main content
Log in

Is the lung floating test a valuable tool or obsolete? A prospective autopsy study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lung floating test is still an obligatory measure to distinguish whether a newborn was born dead or alive. In order to verify the reliability of the floating test, a new clinical trial should examine the results of current cases and thus expose, if the test is still contemporary. Following the question, if the test is appropriate for the nowadays birth collective, 208 lungs of newborns were tested with the floating test. The test showed the expected correct result in 204 cases. However, it indicated a false negative result in four cases, in which the lungs sank, although prior life had been reported by medical staff. Overall, the study was able to prove that the results of the floating test are reliable in 98 %. Further, there was not a single false-positive result (lungs of a stillborn swim). Nevertheless, the test demonstrates that a negative test result cannot be taken as proof for a newborn never to have breathed at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saukko P, Knight B (2004) Knight's forensic pathology, 3rd edn. Arnold, London, pp 439–450

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson M (1994) Suspicious infant deaths: the statute of 1624 and medical evidence at coroners' inquests. In: Clark M, Crawford C (eds) Legal medicine in history. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 64–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Spitz WU (1993) Investigation of deaths in childhood. In: Spitz WU, Spitz DJ, Fisher RS (eds) Spitz and Fisher's medicolegal investigation of death: guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation, 3rd edn. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Illinois, pp 681–686

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glee DJ (1985) Infanticide and child destruction. In: Polson CJ, Gee DJ, Knight B (eds) The essentials of forensic medicine, 4th edn. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 514–531

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buris L (1993) Forensic medicine. Springer Hungaria, Debrecan, pp 240–252

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Payne-James J (ed) (2005) Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine, vol 3. Elsevier, London, pp 367–368

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheaft MT, Hopster DJ (2005) Post mortem technique handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, London, pp 399–400

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson K (1974) Forensic medicine, 7th edn. Edward Arnold, London, pp 158–165

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walcher K (1950) Leitfaden der gerichtlichen medizin—für ärzte und medizinstudierende. Urban und Schwarzenberg, München, pp 116–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofmann ER (1898) Lehrbuch der gerichtlichen medicin (8th edn). Urban & Schwarzenberg, Wien, pp 708–732

    Google Scholar 

  11. Otte M (1987) Die unterschiedliche beurteilung der kindestötung in Gesetzgebung und Gesetzanwendung. Dissertation, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Düsseldorf

  12. Mueller B (1975) Gerichtliche Medizin (2. Band). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1185–1192

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Munkenbeck-Dieke A (1994) Rechtsmedizinische untersuchungen unnatürlicher todesfälle neugeborener—eine forensische studie zur Kindestötung. Dissertation, Fachbereich der Humanmedizin der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen

  14. Forster B, Ropohl D (1986) Rechtsmedizin (4th edn). Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 157–159

    Google Scholar 

  15. Madea B, Dettmeyer R (2007) Basiswissen rechtsmedizin. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 173–175

    Google Scholar 

  16. Penning R (2006) Rechtsmedizin systematisch, 2nd edn. UNI-MED Verlag, Bremen, pp 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moar JJ (1997) The hydrostatic test—a valid method of determining live birth? Am J Forensic Med Pathol 18(1):109–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dressler J, Schmidt U, Hanisch U, Demmler G, Riehn A, Pollak S (2011) Neonatal freshwater drowning after birth in the bathroom. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 32:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibylle Banaschak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Große Ostendorf, AL., Rothschild, M.A., Müller, A.M. et al. Is the lung floating test a valuable tool or obsolete? A prospective autopsy study. Int J Legal Med 127, 447–451 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0727-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0727-1

Keywords

Navigation