Abstract
This study focuses on the evaluation of factors influencing the quality (accuracy and reliability) of non-adult dental age assessment from radiographic stages of permanent teeth (excluding the third molar). We used four distinct cross-sectional samples of 1,528 healthy children: 3 of known geographic origin (Ivory Coast, Iran and France) and 1 additional sample of children whose grandparents originated from a different continent. Two different methods of calculations are compared: the correspondence analysis combined with linear regression (CAR) and Bayesian predictions (with no independence assumption). Our results indicate that the quality of age assessment does not seem to depend predominantly on the use of geographic-specific standards. In the case of Bayesian predictions, we observed a clear trend in favour of significantly higher accuracy and reliability levels when using non-geographic-specific standards. One of the main advantage of Bayesian predictions over maximum likelihood methods of estimation is an overall increase in accuracy with high levels of reliability on a fraction of the test sample and, importantly, across all age categories (contrary to methods based on regression analysis). Importantly, in the case of Bayesian non-adult predictions, and contrary to age estimation techniques based on regression, a better quality does not depend on age.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CAR:
-
correspondence analysis and regression
- DMS:
-
dental mineralisation sequence
- GMI:
-
global maturity index
- SEE:
-
standard error of the estimates.
References
Anderson DL, Anderson GW, Popovich F (1976) Age of attainment of mineralization stages of the permanent dentition. J Forensic Sci 21:191–200
Aykroyd RG, Lucy D, Pollard AM, Solheim T (1997) Technical note: regression analysis in adult age estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol 104:259–265
Bayes T (1764) An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53:370–418
Bhargava A (2000) Modeling the effects of maternal nutritional status and socioeconomic variables on the anthropometric and psychological indicators of Kenyan infants from age 0–6 months. Am J Phys Anthropol 111:89–104
Davis PJ, Hägg U (1994) The accuracy and precision of the “Demirjian system” when used for age determination in Chinese children. Swedish Dent J 18:113–116
Demirjian A (1986) Dentition. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds) Human growth. A comprehensive treatise, vol. II. Plenum, New York, pp 269–298
Demirjian A, Goldstein H (1976) New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol 3:411–421
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227
Deutsch D, Pe’er E, Gedalia I (1984) Changes in size, morphology and weight of human anterior teeth during the fetal period. Growth 48 :74–85
Domingos P, Pazzani M (1997) On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 29 :103–130
Fanning EA (1961) A longitudinal study of tooth formation and root resorption. N Z Dent J 57:202–217
Fanning EA, Brown T (1971) Primary and permanent tooth development. Aust Dent J 16:41–43
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Koski PK, Polacheck DL (1958) The sex difference in tooth calcification. J Dent Res 37:561
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Polacheck DL (1959) Variability of tooth formation. J Dent Res 38:135
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Blizzard RM (1965a) Endocrine factors in dental development. J Dent Res 44:243–258
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS (1965b) Genetic, nutritional and maturational correlates of dental development. J Dent Res 44:228–242
Giles E, Klepinger LL (1988) Confidence intervals for estimates based on linear regression in forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 33:1218–1222
Gleiser I, Hunt EE (1955) The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay. Am J Phys Anthropol 13:253
Greenacre MJ (1993) Correspondence analysis in practice. Academic Press, London
Gulati A, Taneja JR, Chopra SL, Madan S (1990) Interrelationship between dental, skeletal and chronological ages in well-nourished and mal-nourished children. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 8:19–23
Gustafson G, Koch G (1974) Age estimation up to 16 years of age based on dental development. Odontol Revy 25:297–306
Haataja J (1965) Development of the mandibular permanent teeth of Helsinki children. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 61:43–53
Haavikko K (1970) The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantographic study. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 66:101–170
Haavikko K (1974) Tooth formation age estimated on a few selected teeth: a simple method for clinical use. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 70:15–19
Hägg U, Matsson L (1985) Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod 7:24–34
Hartigan JA (1983) Bayes theory. Springer, New York
Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1976) An approach to the scaling of categorized attributes. Biometrika 63:219–229
Konigsberg LW, Frankenberg SR (1992) Estimation of age structure in anthropological demography. Am J Phys Anthropol 89:235–256
Koshy S, Tandon S (1998) Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 94:73–85
Liliequist B, Lundberg M (1971) Skeletal and tooth development. A methodologic investigation. Acta Radiol 11:97–112
Liversidge HM (1994) Accuracy of age estimation from developing teeth of a population of known age (0–5.4 years). Int J Osteoarchaeol 4:37–45
Liversidge HM, Herdeg B, Rösing FW (1998) Dental age estimation of non-adults. A review of methods and principles. In: Alt WK, Rösing FW, Teschler-Nicola M (eds) Dental anthropology. Fundamentals, limits, and prospects. Springer, Wien New York, pp 419–442
Lucy D, Aykroyd G, Pollard AM, Solheim T (1996) A Bayesian approach to adult human age estimation from dental observations by Johanson’s age changes. J Forensic Soc 41:189–194
Moorees C, Fanning E, Hunt E (1963a) Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 42:1490–1502
Moorees C, Fanning E, Hunt E (1963b) Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:205–213
Nanda RS, Chawla TN (1966) Growth and development of dentitions in Indian children. I. Development of permanent teeth. Am J Orthod 52:837
Nolla CM (1960) The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 27:254–266
Nyström M, Kilpinen E, Kleemola-Kujala E (1977) A radiographic study of the formation of some teeth from 0.5 to 3.0 years of age. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 73:167–172
Nyström M, Haataja J, Kataja M, Evälahti M, Peck L, Kleemola-Kujala E (1986) Dental maturity in Finnish children, estimated from the development of seven permanent mandibular teeth. Acta Odont Scand 44:193–198
Phillips LD (1973) Bayesian statistics for social scientists. Thomas Nelson, London
Proy E, Gauthier N (1985) Maturation dentaire: constitution de tables. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 19:523–534
Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schütz HW, Kaatsch H-J, Borrman HIM (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practice. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136
Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic Press, London
Schour I, Massler M (1940) Studies in tooth development: the growth pattern of human teeth. Parts I and II. J Am Dent Assoc 27:1778; 1918
Staaf V, Mornstad H, Welander U (1991) Age estimation based on tooth development: a test of reliability and validity. Scand J Dent Res 99:281–286
Tanner JM (1962) Growth at adolescence. Blackwell, Oxford
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RM, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1975) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height: TW2 method. Academic Press, London
Tukey J (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Vieland V (1998) Bayesian linkage analysis, or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the posterior probability of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 63:947–954
Voors AW (1973) Can dental development be used for assessing age in underdeveloped communities? J Trop Pediatr Environ Child Health 19:242
Wolanski N (1966) A new method for the evaluation of tooth formation. Acta Genet (Basel) 16:186–197
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. G. Dasgupta, from the Department Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University in New York; Prof. B. Brinkmann and anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript. We thank Dr Frapier (Montpellier), Dr De Brondeau (Bordeaux) and the Services d’Odontologie des CHU de Bordeaux et de Montpellier, for access to the orthopantomographs. We also gratefully acknowledge the important support of the Ministère de la Recherche and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique for funding and the expertise of Dr F. Houët of the Laboratoire d’Anthropologie, Université Bordeaux 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funded by the French Ministry of Research (“Action Concertée Incitative”).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braga, J., Heuze, Y., Chabadel, O. et al. Non-adult dental age assessment: correspondence analysis and linear regression versus Bayesian predictions. Int J Legal Med 119, 260–274 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0494-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0494-8