Abstract
Due to indications that kinetochore proteins are an integral part of the protein scaffold component of the chromosome (Earnshaw et al. 1984), we chose to map the distribution of scaffold attachment regions (SARs) at centromeres. Using the SAR mapping assay of Mirkovitch et al., Southern blots were prepared and probed with32P-labeled fragments from the human 1.9 kb centromeric α-satellite repeat unit of chromosome 1 or the 1.7 kb centromeric α-satellite repeat unit of chromosome 16. Our results demonstrated the presence of one SAR site per 1.9 kb repeat unit in chromosome 1, and every 1.7 kb repeat unit in chromosome 16, separated by regions of small DNA loops over the length of the α-satellite regions. We also identified several in vitro vertebrate topoisomerase II and cenP-B consensus sequences throughout the chromosome 1 α-satellite region using computer and base ratio analysis, to address the question as to why some α-satellite regions are SAR related and others are not. To provide in situ indications of SAR localization in the human genome, SAR DNA and non-SAR DNA were prepared following lithium 3,5-diiodosalicylate extraction. Sequences protected from DNAse I digestion by SAR proteins, as compared with unprotected DNA that was digested by the enzyme, was labeled with biotin-UTP, hybridized to chromosomal DNA in situ, and then detected with fluorescein-avidin-DCS. Both SAR and non-SAR DNA selectively labeled virtually all centromeric regions of the human metaphase karyotype. Chromosomal arms were less strongly bound by SAR DNA, with a pattern that followed the chromosomal axis. In the more condensed chromosomes an R-banding pattern was evident. In general, labeling patterns produced by both SAR and non-SAR fractions were similar, as expected from the indications that SAR DNAs are heterogenous in sequence and do not form a specific class of sequences. We conclude that centromeric regions of several, possibly all, human metaphase chromosomes are also regions where the chromosomal axis contains loops, smaller in size than in the arms and where attachment sites are concentrated. This clustering of SARs may be responsible in part for the tight chromatin packing associated with the primary constriction of the centromeric region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amati B, Gasser G (1988) Chromosomal ARS and CEN elements bind specifically to the yeast nuclear scaffold. Cell 54: 967–978
Bickmore WA, Oghene K (1996) Visualizing the spatial relationships between defined DNA sequences and the axial region of extracted metaphase chromosomes. Cell 84:95–104
Blasquez V, Sperry A, Cockerill P, Garrard W (1989) Protein: DNA interactions at chromosomal loop attachment sites. Gene regulation II: higher organisms. Genome 31:503–509
Bode J, Maass K (1988) Chromatin domain surrounding the humanInterferon-B gene as defined by scaffold attached regions. Biochemistry 27:4706–4711
Broeker PL (1993) The relationship of chromatin structure to breakpoints in translocations and deletions in human cancer specifically gliomas and teutremins. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago, Ill
Brotherton T, Zenk D, Kahanic S, Reneker J (1991) Avian nuclear matrix proteins bind very tightly to cellular DNA of the B-globin gene enhancer in a tissue-specific fashion. Biochemistry 30:5845–5850
Choo KH, Vissel B, Nagy A, Earle E, Kalitsis P (1991) A survey of the genomic distribution of alpha satellite DNA on all the human chromosomes, and derivation of a new consensus sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1179–1182
Cockerill P (1990) Nuclear matrix attachment occurs in several regions of theIgH locus. Nucleic Acids Res 18:2643–2648
Cockerill P, Garrard W (1986) Chromosomal loop anchorage of the Kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell 44:273–282
Cockerill P, Yuen M, Garrard T (1987) The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements. J Biol Chem 262: 5394–5397
Cook PR (1988) The nucleoskeleton: artefact, passive framework or active site? J Cell Sci 90:1–6
de Lange T (1992) Human telomeres are attached to the nuclear matrix EMBO J 2:717–724
Dijkwel P, Hamlin J (1988) Matrix attachment regions are positioned near replication initiation sites, genes, and an interamplicon junction in the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain of chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol 12: 5398–5409
Earnshaw WC, Halligan N, Cooke C, Rothfield N (1984) The kinetochore is part of the metaphase chromosome scaffold. J Cell Biol 98:352–357
Ebert SN, Shtrom SS, Muller MT (1990) Topoisomerase II cleavage of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA in vivo is replication dependent. J Virol 64:4059–4066
Gasser S, Laemmli U (1986) Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes ofD. melanogaster. Cell 46:521–530
Gasser S, Amati B, Cardenas M, Hoffmann J (1989) Studies on scaffold attachment sites and their relation to genome function. Int Rev Cytol 119:57–96
Gerdes MG, Carter KC, Moen PT, Lawrence JB (1994) Dynamic changes in the higher level chromatin organization of specific sequences revealed by in situ hybridization to nuclear halos. J Cell Biol 126:289–304
Greig G, England S, Bedford M, Willard H (1989) Chromosome specific alpha satellite DNA from the centromere of human chromosome 16. Am J Hum Genet 45:862–872
Haaf T, Ward DC (1994) Structural analysis of α satellite DNA and centromere proteins using extended chromatin and chromosomes. Hum Mol Genet 3:697–709
Hall G, Allen G, Loer D, Thompson W, Spiker S (1991) Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9320–9324
Hanson R, Ley T (1992) A-T rich scaffold attachment regions flank the hematopoietic serine protease genes clustered on chromosome 14q 11. 2 Blood 79:610–618
Heck MMS, Hittelman W, Earnshaw WC (1988) Differential expression of DNA topoisomerases I and II during the eukaryotic cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1086–1090
Hofmann J, Laroche T, Brand A, Gasser S (1989) RAP-1 factor is necessary for DNA loop formation in vitro at the silent mating type locusHML. Cell 57:725–737
Jankelevich S, Kolman J, Bodnar J, Miller G (1992) A nuclear matrix attachment region organizes the epstein-barr viral plasmid in raji cells into a single DNA domain. EMBO J 11: 1165–1176
Jarmin A, Higgs D (1988) Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J 7:3337–3344
Levy-Wilson B, Fortier C (1989) The limits of the DNase I sensitive domain of the human apolipoprotein B gene coincide with the locations of chromosomal anchorage loops and define the 5′ and 3′ boundaries of the gene. J Biol Chem 264:21196–21204
Maniatis T, Fritsch E, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Masumoto H, Masukata H, Muro Y, Nozaki N, Okazaki T (1989) A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J Cell Biol 109:1964–1973
Mirkovitch J, Mirault M, Laemmli U (1984) Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sizes on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39:223–232
Mirkovitch J, Gasser SM, Laemmli UK (1987) Scaffold attachment of DNA loops in metaphase chromosomes. J Mol Biol 200:101–109
Nasir J, Maconochie MK, Brown SDM (1991) Co-amplification of L1 line elements with localized low copy repeats in giemsa dark bands: implications for genome organisation. Nucleic Acids Res 19:3255–3260
Pardoll DM, Vogelstein B (1980) Sequence analysis of nuclear matrix associated DNA from rat liver. Exp Cell Res 128: 466–470
Pegoraro L, Matera L, Ritz J, Levis A, Palumbo A, Biagini G (1983) Establishment of a Ph1-positive human cell line (BV173). J Natl Cancer Inst 70:447–451
Phi-Van L, Stratling W (1988) The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J 3:655–664
Pluta A, Cooke C, Earnshaw W (1990) Structure of the human centromere at metaphase. Trends Biochem Sci 15:181–185
Prosser J, Frommer J Paul C, Vincent PC (1986) Sequence relationships of three human satellite DNAs. J Mol Biol 187: 145–155
Rowley JD, Diaz MO, Espinosa III R, Patel YD, van Melle E, Ziemin S, Taillon-Miler P, Lichter P, Evans GA, Kersey JH, Ward DC, Domer PH, Le Beau MM (1990) Mapping chromosome band 11q23 in human acute leukemia with biotinylated probes: identification of 11q23 translocation breakpoints with a yeast artificial chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9358–9362
Saitoh Y, Laemmli UK (1994) Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell 76:609–622
Scheuermann RH, Chen U (1989) A developmental-specific factor binds to suppressor sites flanking the immunoglobulin heavychain enhancer. Genes Dev 3:1255–1266
Small K, Nelkin B, Vogelstein B (1982) Nonrandom distribution of repeated DNA sequences with respect to supercoiled loops and the nuclear matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:5911–5915
Southern EM (1975) Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA. J Mol Biol 94:51–70
Sperry A, Blasquez V, Garrard W (1989) Dysfunction of chromosomal loop attachment sites: illegitimate recombination linked to matrix association regions and topoisomerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:5497–5501
Spitzner JR, Muller M (1988) A consensus sequence for cleavage by vertebrate DNA topoisomerase II. Nucleic Acids Res 16:5533–5556
Strick R, Laemmli U (1995) SARs are cis DNA elements of chromosome dynamics: synthesis of a sar repressor protein. Cell 83:1137–1148
Strissel Broeker PL, Gill Super H, Thirman MJ, Pomykala H, Yonebayshi Y, Tanabe S, Zeleznik-Le N, Rowley JD (1996) Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within theMLL breakpoint cluster region in de novo acute leukemia and in treatment related acute myeloid leukemia: correlation with scaffold attachment regions and topoisomerase II consensus binding sites. Blood 87:1912–1922
von Kries JP, Phi-Van L, Diekmann S, Stratling W (1990) A noncurved chicken lysozyme 5′ matrix attachment site is 3′ followed by a strongly curved DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 18:3881–3885
Waye, JS, Durfy SJ, Pinkel K, Kenwrick S (1987) Chromosomespecific alpha satellite DNA from human chromosome 1: hierarchical structure and genomic organization of a polymorphic domain spanning several hundred kilobase pairs of centromeric DNA. Genomics 1:43–51
Willard H (1990) Centromere of mammalian chromosomes. Trends Genet 6:410–416
Willard H, Waye J (1987a) Hierarchical order in chromosomespecific human alpha satellite DNA. Trends Genet 3:192–198
Willard H, Waye J (1987b) Chromosome-specific subsets of human alpha satellite DNA: analysis of sequence divergence within and between chromosomal subsets and evidence for an ancestral pentameric repeat. J Mol Evol 25:207–214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This manuscript is dedicated with deep respect and admiration to Professor Wolfgang Beermann in honor of his 75th birthday
Edited by: W. Scheer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strissel, P.L., Espinosa, R., Rowley, J.D. et al. Scaffold attachment regions in centromere-associated DNA. Chromosoma 105, 122–133 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509522
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509522