Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of radiation quality on interactions between oxidative stress, protein and DNA damage in Deinococcus radiodurans

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ionizing radiation damages DNA and also induces oxidative stress, which can affect the function of proteins involved in DNA repair, thereby causing repair of DNA damage to become less efficient. We previously developed a mathematical model of this potentially synergistic relationship and applied it to γ-ray exposure data on the radiation-resistant prokaryote Deinococcus radiodurans. Here, we investigate the effects of radiation quality on these processes by applying the model to data on exposures of D. radiodurans to heavy ions with linear energy transfer (LET) of 18.5–11,300 keV/μm. The model adequately describes these data using three parameters combinations: radiogenic DNA damage induction, repair protein inactivation and cellular repair capacity. Although statistical uncertainties around best-fit parameter estimates are substantial, the behaviors of model parameters are consistent with current knowledge of LET effects: inactivation cross-sections for both DNA and proteins increase with increasing LET; DNA damage yield per unit of radiation dose also increases with LET; protein damage per unit dose tends to decrease with LET; DNA and especially protein damage yields are reduced when cells are irradiated in the dry state. These results suggest that synergism between oxidative stress and DNA damage may play an important role not only during γ-ray exposure, but during high-LET radiation exposure as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams GE, Willson RL, Bisby RH, Cundall RB (1971) On the mechanism of the radiation-induced inactivation of ribonuclease in dilute aqueous solution. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 20:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams GE, Posener ML, Bisby RH, Cundall RB, Key JR (1979) Free radical reactions with proteins and enzymes: the inactivation of pepsin. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 35:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby A, Christman EA, Jayko M (1985) Radiation chemistry of high-energy carbon, neon, and argon ions: hydroxyl radical yields. Radiat Res 104:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaithamby A, Uematsu N, Chatterjee A, Story MD, Burma S, Chen DJ (2008) Repair of HZE-particle-induced DNA double-strand breaks in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 169:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barendsen GW (1994) RBE-LET relationships for different types of lethal radiation damage in mammalian cells: comparison with DNA dsb and an interpretation of differences in radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol 66:433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni F, Bettega D, Calzolari P, Cherubini R, Massariello P, Tallone L (2002) Inactivation cross sections for mammalian cells exposed to charged particles: a phenomenological approach. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 99:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisby RH, Cundall RB, Movassaghi S, Adams GE, Posener ML, Wardman P (1982) Selective free radical reactions with proteins and enzymes: a reversible equilibrium in the reaction of (SCN)2 radical with lysozyme. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 42:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisby RH, Cundall RB, Sims HE, Burns WG (1984) The inactivation of papain by high LET radiations. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 46:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasius M, Sommer S, Hubscher U (2008) Deinococcus radiodurans: what belongs to the survival kit? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 43:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butts JJ, Katz R (1967) Theory of RBE for heavy ion bombardment of dry enzymes and viruses. Radiat Res 30:855–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culard F, Gervais A, de Vuyst G, Spotheim-Maurizot M, Charlier M (2003) Response of a DNA-binding protein to radiation-induced oxidative stress. J Mol Biol 328:1185–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culard F, Bouffard S, Charlier M (2005) High-LET irradiation of a DNA-binding protein: protein-protein and DNA-protein crosslinks. Radiat Res 164:774–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza DI, Harrison L (2003) Repair of clustered uracil DNA damages in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 31:4573–4581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MJ (2006) Modulating radiation resistance: Insights based on defenses against reactive oxygen species in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Clin Lab Med 26:491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MJ (2009) A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MJ, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Venkateswaran A, Hess M, Omelchenko MV, Kostandarithes HM, Makarova KS, Wackett LP, Fredrickson JK, Ghosal D (2004) Accumulation of Mn(II) in Deinococcus radiodurans facilitates gamma-radiation resistance. Science 306:1025–1028

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MJ, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Leapman RD, Lai B, Ravel B, Li SM, Kemner KM, Fredrickson JK (2007) Protein oxidation implicated as the primary determinant of bacterial radioresistance. PLoS Biol 5:e92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DL (1969) The survival of Micrococcus radiodurans irradiated at high LET and the effect of acridine orange. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 16:583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eon S, Culard F, Sy D, Charlier M, Spotheim-Maurizot M (2001) Radiation disrupts protein-DNA complexes through damage to the protein. The lac repressor-operator system. Radiat Res 156:110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosal D, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Venkateswaran A, Zhai M, Kostandarithes HM, Brim H, Makarova KS, Wackett LP, Fredrickson JK, Daly MJ (2005) How radiation kills cells: survival of Deinococcus radiodurans and Shewanella oneidensis under oxidative stress. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard N, Begusova M, Castaing B, Spotheim-Maurizot M (2004) Radiation affects binding of Fpg repair protein to an abasic site containing DNA. Radiat Res 162:566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard N, Goffinont S, Bure C, Davidkova M, Maurizot JC, Cadene M, Spotheim-Maurizot M (2007) Radiation-induced oxidative damage to the DNA-binding domain of the lactose repressor. Biochem J 403:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhead DT (2006) Energy deposition stochastics and track structure: what about the target? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 122:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhead DT, Nikjoo H (1987) Physical mechanism for inactivation of metallo-enzymes by characteristic X-rays: analysis of the data of Jawad and Watt. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 52:651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hada M, Georgakilas AG (2008) Formation of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation: a review. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 49:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada N, Funayama T, Wada S, Sakashita T, Kakizaki T, Ni M, Kobayashi Y (2006) LET-dependent survival of irradiated normal human fibroblasts and their descendents. Radiat Res 166:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen T (1966) Production of free radicals in solid biological substances by heavy ions. Radiat Res 27:676–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirayama R, Ito A, Tomita M, Tsukada T, Yatagai F, Noguchi M, Matsumoto Y, Kase Y, Ando K, Okayasu R, Furusawa Y (2009) Contributions of direct and indirect actions in cell killing by high-LET radiations. Radiat Res 171:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imamura M, Sawada S, Kasahara-Imamura M, Harima K, Harada K (2002) Synergistic cell-killing effect of a combination of hyperthermia and heavy ion beam irradiation: in expectation of a breakthrough in the treatment of refractory cancers (review). Int J Mol Med 9:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonah CD, Madhava Rao BS (2001) Radiation chemistry: present status and future trends. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer J, Egenolf R, Ikpeme SE (2002a) DNA double strand break induction in yeast. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 99:269–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer J, Egenolf R, Ikpeme S (2002b) Heavy ion-induced DNA double-strand breaks in yeast. Radiat Res 157:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk A, Serafin E, Puchala M (2008) Inactivation of chosen dehydrogenases by the products of water radiolysis and secondary albumin and haemoglobin radicals. Int J Radiat Biol 84:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreipl MS, Friedland W, Paretzke HG (2009) Time- and space-resolved Monte Carlo study of water radiolysis for photon, electron and ion irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 48:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meesungnoen J, Jay-Gerin JP (2005) High-LET radiolysis of liquid water with 1H+, 4He2+, 12C6+, and 20Ne9+ ions: effects of multiple ionization. J Phys Chem A 109:6406–6419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micke U, Horneck G, Kozubek S (1994) Double strand breaks in the DNA of Bacillus subtilis cells irradiated by heavy ions. Adv Space Res 14:207–211

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Montaner B, O’Donovan P, Reelfs O, Perrett CM, Zhang X, Xu YZ, Ren X, Macpherson P, Frith D, Karran P (2007) Reactive oxygen-mediated damage to a human DNA replication and repair protein. EMBO Rep 8:1074–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozumder A (1999) Fundamentals of radiation chemistry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto M, Prise KM, Michael BD (2002a) Double strand break rejoining after irradiation of human fibroblasts with X rays or alpha particles: PFGE studies and numerical models. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 99:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto M, Prise KM, Michael BD (2002b) Quantification of radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks in human fibroblasts by PFGE: testing the applicability of random breakage models. Int J Radiat Biol 78:375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roots R, Chatterjee A, Chang P, Lommel L, Blakely EA (1985) Characterization of hydroxyl radical-induced damage after sparsely and densely ionizing irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 47:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roots R, Holley W, Chatterjee A, Irizarry M, Kraft G (1990) The formation of strand breaks in DNA after high-LET irradiation: a comparison of data from in vitro and cellular systems. Int J Radiat Biol 58:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagstuen E, Sanderud A, Hole EO (2004) The solid-state radiation chemistry of simple amino acids, revisited. Radiat Res 162:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Mandal PC, Bhattacharyya SN (1992) Radiation-induced inactivation of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase in dilute aqueous solution. Radiat Res 132:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid AK, Lidstrom ME (2002) Involvement of two putative alternative sigma factors in stress response of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol 184:6182–6189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuryak I, Brenner DJ (2009) A model of interactions between radiation-induced oxidative stress, protein and DNA damage in Deinococcus radiodurans. J Theor Biol 261:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinks JWT, Woods RJ (1990) An introduction to radiation chemistry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtman ER (1993) Oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins by radiolysis and by metal-catalyzed reactions. Annu Rev Biochem 62:797–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenerlow B, Hoglund E, Carlsson J (2002a) DNA fragmentation by charged particle tracks. Adv Space Res 30:859–863

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenerlow B, Hoglund E, Elmroth K, Karlsson KH, Radulescu I (2002b) Radiation quality dependence of DNA damage induction. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 99:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhi SS, Shashidhar R, Kumar SA, Bandekar JR (2009) Radiation resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 with respect to growth phase. FEMS Microbiol Lett

  • Taguchi M, Kojima T (2005) Yield of OH radicals in water under high-density energy deposition by heavy-ion irradiation. Radiat Res 163:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi M, Kimura A, Watanabe R, Hirota K (2009) Estimation of yields of hydroxyl radicals in water under various energy heavy ions. Radiat Res 171:254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Yatagai F, Kitayama S (1983) Effect of heavy ions on bacterial spores. Adv Space Res 3:95–104

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Terato H, Tanaka R, Nakaarai Y, Hirayama R, Furusawa Y, Ide H (2007) Analysis of complex DNA lesions generated by heavy ion beams. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf): 221–222

  • Tsuruoka C, Suzuki M, Kanai T, Fujitaka K (2005) LET and ion species dependence for cell killing in normal human skin fibroblasts. Radiat Res 163:494–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JF (1990) The yield of DNA double-strand breaks produced intracellularly by ionizing radiation: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 57:1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Yu D, Furusawa Y, Okayasu R, Tong J, Cao J, Fan S (2009) Regulation of ATM in DNA double strand break repair accounts for the radiosensitivity in human cells exposed to high linear energy transfer ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 670:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi H, Uchihori Y, Yasuda N, Takada M, Kitamura H (2005) Estimation of yields of OH radicals in water irradiated by ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 46:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Matsumura A, Yamamoto K, Kumada H, Hori N, Torii Y, Shibata Y, Nose T (2003) Characterization of neutron beams for boron neutron capture therapy: in-air radiobiological dosimetry. Radiat Res 160:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita S, Katsumura Y, Lin M, Muroya Y, Miyazaki T, Murakami T, Meesungnoen J, Jay-Gerin JP (2008) Water radiolysis with heavy ions of energies up to 28 GeV. 3. Measurement of G(MV*+) in deaerated methyl viologen solutions containing various concentrations of sodium formate and Monte Carlo simulation. Radiat Res 170:521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang N, Chaudhry MA, Wallace SS (2006) Base excision repair by hNTH1 and hOGG1: a two edged sword in the processing of DNA damage in gamma-irradiated human cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 5:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokota Y, Yamada S, Hase Y, Shikazono N, Narumi I, Tanaka A, Inoue M (2007) Initial yields of DNA double-strand breaks and DNA fragmentation patterns depend on linear energy transfer in tobacco BY-2 protoplasts irradiated with helium, carbon and neon ions. Radiat Res 167:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahradka K, Slade D, Bailone A, Sommer S, Averbeck D, Petranovic M, Lindner AB, Radman M (2006) Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature 443:569–573

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H, Schafer M, Schmitz C, Bucker H (1994) Effects of heavy ions on inactivation and DNA double strand breaks in Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Adv Space Res 14:213–216

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research supported by National Institutes of Health grants P41 EB002033-09 and P01 CA-49062.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Brenner.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix we explore some properties of the behavior of predicted cell surviving fraction after acute irradiation (S), given by (3) of the main text. To do so, we apply some limiting cases described below.

Effect of repair protein inactivation (k 1)

The model assumes that DSB repair in D. radiodurans is inherently 100% efficient, but that this efficiency is reduced by radiogenic inactivation of repair proteins (parameter k 1), and also by limitations on protein turnover rates, repair rates, and time available for repair (affecting parameter k 23). At relatively small radiation doses (D ≪ 1/k 1), most of the repair proteins remain functional and DSB repair remains very efficient. In this situation the term exp[−k 1 D] in (3) is approximately equal to 1, so the cell-surviving fraction has the form:

$$ S = { \exp }\left( { - c_{8} D\exp \left[ { - k_{23} } \right]} \right) $$
(5)

Here, the reduction of cell survival with dose is exponential, but this exponential slope is much smaller than the maximum it could reach (which would be equal to the DSB induction rate per unit dose, c 8) by the factor exp[−k 23]. The DSB repair efficiency could be approximated by 1 − exp[−k 23].

In contrast, at much larger radiation doses (D ≫ 1/k 1), the term exp{−k 1 D} in (3) approaches zero, so the cell surviving fraction becomes:

$$ S = \exp \left( { - c_{8} D} \right) $$
(6)

Consequently, at high doses the exponential slope approaches the DSB induction rate per unit dose (c 8), meaning that efficiency of DSB repair is reduced essentially to zero.

Effect of repair capacity (k 23)

If the repair-related parameter k 23 approaches zero, e.g. due to genetic repair defects, the term exp[−k 23 exp{−k 1 D}] in (3) becomes 1, and the exponential slope of the cell survival curve reaches the value c 8. In contrast, if k 23 become large, this term becomes small, making the exponential slope ≪ c 8, as intuitively expected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuryak, I., Brenner, D.J. Effects of radiation quality on interactions between oxidative stress, protein and DNA damage in Deinococcus radiodurans . Radiat Environ Biophys 49, 693–703 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-010-0305-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-010-0305-1

Keywords

Navigation