Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appropriate radiation accident medical management: necessity of extensive preparatory planning

  • Review
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the rareness of radiation accidents, their potential consequences can be very serious, and appropriate medical management requires sufficient preparatory planning. To identify necessary factors for sufficient preparatory planning, three different radiation accidents were analyzed, i.e. the accidents in Goiânia, Brazil, 1987; Lilo, Georgia, 1997; and Tokai-mura, Japan, 1999. These radiation accidents have been chosen specifically because they provide a wide spectrum of potential radiation accident scenarios. After a brief description of the accidents and the following medical management, the measures taken are analyzed in terms of diagnosing radiation-induced health damage, determining the cause, dealing with contamination/incorporation, pathophysiological and therapeutic principles, preparatory planning, national and international cooperation and training. Several important factors are identified that should be considered in preparatory planning, i.e. preventing delayed diagnosis and training of medical personnel. Due to limited national resources, an intensified international cooperation to manage medical radiation accidents is of great importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Densow D, Fliedner TM, Arndt D (1992) Übersicht und Kategorisierung von Strahlenunfällen und -katastrophen als Grundlage medizinischer Maßnahmen. In: Der Bundesminister für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Ed) Medizinische Maßnahmen bei Strahlenunfällen, Veröffentlichungen der Strahlenschutzkommission, Gustav Fischer Stuttgart Jena New York, 27:9–50

  2. Zimmerman PD, Loeb C (2004) Dirty bombs the threat revisited. Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University. Defense Horizons 38

  3. Meineke V, van Beuningen D, Sohns T, Fliedner TM (2003) Medical management principles for radiation accidents. Mil Med 168:219–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bland SA (2004) Mass casualty management for radiological and nuclear incidents. J R Army Med Corps 150(Suppl 1):27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubenau JO, Strom DJ (2002) Safety and security of radiation sources in the aftermath of 11 September 2001. Health Phys 83:155–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Timins JK, Lipoti JA (2003) Radiological terrorism. N J Med 100:14–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mettler FA Jr (2005) Medical resources and requirements for responding to radiological terrorism. Health Phys 89:488–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JM, Ansari A, Harper FT (2005) Hospital management of mass radiological casualties: reassessing exposures from contaminated victims of an exploded radiological dispersal device. Health Phys 89:513–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. International Atomic Energy Agency (1999) Report on the preliminary fact finding mission following the accident at the nuclear fuel processing facility in Tokaimura, Japan. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  10. Hirama T, Tanosaki S, Kandatsu S, Kuroiwa N, Namada T, Tsuji H, Yamada S, Katoh H, Wamamoto N, Tsuji H, Suzuki G, Akashi M (2003) Initial medical management of patients severely irradiated in the Tokai-mura criticality accident. Br J Radiol 76:246–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muramatsu Y, Noda Y, Yonehara H, Ishigure N, Yoshida S, Yukawa M, Tagami K, Ban-Nai T, Uchida S, Hirama T, Akashi M, Nakamura Y (2001) Determination of radionuclides produced by neutrons in heavily exposed workers of the JCO criticality accident in Tokai-mura for estimating an individual’s neutrone fluence. J Radiat Res 42(Suppl):117–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayata I, Kanda R, Minamihisamatsu M, Furukawa A, Sasaki M (2001) Cytological dose estimation for 3 severely exposed patients in the JCO criticality accident in Tokai-Mura. J Radiat Res 42(Suppl):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2005) Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London, Buenos Aires, Hong Kong, Sydney, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farina R, Brandao-Mello CE, Oliveira AR (1991) Medical aspects of 137Cs decorporation: the Goiania radiological accident. Health Phys 60:63–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. International Atomic Energy Agency (1988) The radiological accident in Goiânia. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  16. International Atomic Energy Agency (2000) The radiological accident in Lilo. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  17. Gottlöber P, Bezold G, Weber L, Gourmelon P, Cosset JM, Bahren W, Hald HJ, Fliedner TM, Peter RU (2000) The radiation accident in Georgia: clinical appearence and diagnosis of cutaneus radiation syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institute of Radiological Sciences (2002) The report of the criticality accident in a uranium conversion test plant in Tokaimura. National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS-M−154), Chiba

  19. Meineke V, Fliedner TM (2005) Radiation-induced multi-organ involvement and failure: challenges for radiation accident medical management and future research. Br J Radiol Suppl 27:196–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Toohey RE (2003) Internal dose assessment in radiation accidents. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 105:329–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salter CA (2001) Psychological effects of nuclear and radiological warfare. Mil Med 166:17–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Friesecke I, Beyrer K, Fliedner TM (2001) Medical treatment protocols for radiation accident victims as a basis for a computerised guidance system. Br J Radiol 74:121–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pieper B, Grossmann HP, Weiss M, Fliedner TM, Akleyev AV (1999) Project RATEMA—one year’s experience. J Telemed Telecare Suppl 1:89–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levy K, Aghababian RV, Hirsch EF, Screneci D, Boshyan A, Ricks RC, Samiei M (2000) An internet-based exercise as a component of an overall training program addressing medical aspects of radiation emergency management. Prehospital Disaster Med 15:18–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coleman CN, Blakely WF, Fike JR, MacVittie TJ, Metting NF, Mitchell JB, Moulder JE, Preston RJ, Seed TM, Stone HB, Tofilon PJ, Wong RS (2003) Molecular and cellular biology of moderate-dose (1–10 Gy) radiation and potential mechanisms of radiation protection: report of a workshop at Bethesda, Maryland, December 17–18, 2001. Radiat Res 159:812–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Code of conduct on the safety and security of radioactive sources. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  27. International Atomic Energy Agency (2005) Guidance on the import and export of radioactive sources. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  28. Breitenstein BD Jr (2003) The medical management of unintentional radionuclide intakes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 105:495–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Council on Radiation Protection, Measurements, Bethesda MD (2001) Management of terrorist events involving radioactive material. NCRP report, vol 138, pp 1–232

  30. Gonzales AJ (2001) Security of radioactive sources, the evolving of new international dimensions. IAEA Bull 43(4):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fliedner TM, Dörr HD, Meineke V (2005) Multi-organ involvement as a pathogenetic principle of the radiation syndromes: a study involving 110 case histories documented in SEARCH and classified as the bases of hemopoietic indicators of effect. Br J Radiol Suppl 27:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Friesecke I, Beyrer K, Wedel R, Reimers K, Fiedner TM (2000) SEARCH: a system for evaluation and archiving of radiation accidents based on case histories. Radiat Environ Biophys 39:213–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Neuherbergstraße 11, 80937, Munich, Germany

    H. D. Dörr & V. Meineke

Authors
  1. H. D. Dörr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Meineke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Dörr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dörr, H.D., Meineke, V. Appropriate radiation accident medical management: necessity of extensive preparatory planning. Radiat Environ Biophys 45, 237–244 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0068-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0068-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation