Skip to main content
Log in

Dicentric chromosomes in monolayers of human lymphocytes produced by monochromatized synchrotron radiation with photon energies from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A systematic approach was used to examine the induction of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with monochromatized synchrotron radiation produced with photon energies in the range from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV. To avoid potential confounding factors that could influence the outcome of the experiments, only blood from one individual was used. Since for the irradiation experiments with these low photon energies the local dose variations would become unacceptable, monolayers of lymphocytes attached within 3 h PHA stimulation have been used. The culture conditions ensured that the chromosome analysis could be performed exclusively in metaphases of the first cell cycle in vitro. There is a strong indication for a systematic change of the α coefficient of the linear quadratic dose-response relationship from 1.83 keV (α=1.26±0.28) with increasing energy up to 6.9 keV (α=8.24±0.41) and a decrease with further increase of energy up to 17.4 keV (α=3.83±1.72). A tendency for a systematic change of the β coefficient seems to be present at energies of 6.9 keV (β=8.04±0.40) and 4.8 keV (β=9.48±1.57) as well as at energies of 3.10 keV (β=2.99±0.51) and 1.83 keV (β=0.40±0.25). These results agree in essence with the previously published large data set from Sasaki’s laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. . Schmid E, Krumrey M, Ulm G, Roos H, Regulla D (2003) The maximum low-dose RBE of 17.4 and 40 keV monochromatic X-rays for the induction of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes. Radiat Res 160:499–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmid E, Regulla D, Kramer HM, Harder D (2002) The effect of 29 kV X- rays on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes. Radiat Res 159:771–777

    Google Scholar 

  3. Regulla D, Panzer W, Schmid E, Stephan G, Harder D (2001) Detection of elevated RBE in human lymphocytes exposed to secondary electrons released from X-irradiated metal surfaces. Radiat Res 155:744–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmid E, Bauchinger M (1998) LET dependence of dicentric yields in human lymphocytes induced by low doses of sparsely ionizing radiations and its implication for risk assessments. Health Phys 74:719–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankenberg D, Kelnhofer K, Bär K, Frankenberg-Schwager M (2002) Enhanced neoplastic transformation by mammography X-rays relative to 200 kVp X-rays. Indication for a strong dependence on photon energy of the RBEM for various endpoints. Radiat Res 157:99–105; erratum Radiat Res 158:126

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kellerer AM (2002) Electron spectra and the RBE of X-rays. Radiat Res 158:13–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmid E (2002) Commentary: is there reliable experimental evidence for a low dose RBE of about 4 of mammography X-rays relative to 200 kV X-rays? Radiat Res 158:778–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankenberg-Schwager M, Garg I, Frankenberg D, Greve B, Severin E, Uthe D, Göhde W (2002) Mutagenicity of low-filtered 30 kVp X-rays, mammography X-rays and conventional X-rays in cultured mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol 78:781–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner DJ, Sawant SG, Hande MP et al. (2002) Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation? Int J Radiat Biol 78:1065–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid E, Hieber L, Heinzmann U, Roos H, Kellerer AM (1996) Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by in vitro α-particle irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 35:179–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Regulla D, Schmid E, Friedland W, Panzer W, Heinzmann U, Harder D (2002) Enhanced values of the RBE and H ratio for cytogenetic effects induced by secondary electrons from an X-irradiated gold surface. Radiat Res 158:505–515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Görner W, Hentschel MP, Müller BR et al. (2001) BAMline: the first hard X-ray beamline at Bessy II. Nuclear Instr Methods A 467–468:703–706

  13. Krumrey M, Ulm G (2001) High accuracy detector calibration at the PTB four-crystal monochromator beamline. Nuclear Instr Methods A 467–468:1175–1178

  14. Engelke BA, Oetzmann W, Struppek G (1988) PTB-Report Dos-16. Braunschweig, Germany

  15. Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) Tables of X-ray mass attentuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report NISTIR 5632, pp 1–111

  16. Kanda R, Jiang T, Hayata I, Kobayashi S (1994) Effects of colcemid concentration on chromosome aberration analysis in human lymphocytes. J Radiat Res 35:41–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bauchinger M, Schmid E (1998) LET dependence of yield ratios of radiation-induced intra- and interchromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 74:17–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauchinger M, Schmid E, Streng S, Dresp J (1983) Quantitative analysis of the chromosome damage at first division of human lymphocytes after60Co γ-irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 22:225–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid E, Braselmann H, Nahrstedt U (1995) Comparison of γ-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH. Mutat Res 348:125–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasaki MS, Kobayashi K, Hieda K et al. (1989) Induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by monochromatic X-rays of quantum energy between 4.8 and 14.6 keV. Int J Radiat Biol 56:975–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki MS (1991) Primary damage and fixation of chromosomal DNA as probed by monochromatic soft X-rays and low-energy neutrons. In: Fielden EM, O’Neill P (eds) The early effects of radiation on DNA. NATO ASI Series, vol 54. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–384

  22. Virsik RP, Schäfer CH, Harder D, Goodhead DT, Cox R, Thacker J (1980) Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by ultrasoft AlK and CK X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 38:545–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roos H, Schmid E (1998) Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by 5.4 keV X-rays. Radiat Environ Biophys 36:251–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki MS, Takatsuji T, Ejima Y (1998) Commentary: The F value cannot be ruled out as a chromosomal fingerprint of radiation quality. Radiat Res 150:253–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kellerer AM, Rossi HH (1972) The theory of dual radiation action. Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 8:85–157

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kellerer AM, Rossi HH (1978) A generalized formulation of dual radiation action. Radiat Res 75:471–488

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmid E, Braselmann H, Bauchinger M (1999) Does the limiting F value at very low doses depend systematically on linear energy transfer? Radiat Res 152:563–566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The careful technical support of Marianne Haney (GSF) and Michael Hoffmann (PTB) is gratefully acknowledged. This work was financially supported by the German Federal Office of Radiation Protection under the contract no. StSch 4278.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Krumrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krumrey, M., Ulm, G. & Schmid, E. Dicentric chromosomes in monolayers of human lymphocytes produced by monochromatized synchrotron radiation with photon energies from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV. Radiat Environ Biophys 43, 1–6 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-004-0232-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-004-0232-0

Keywords

Navigation