Abstract
The volcanic rocks of the Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province (CASP) are recognized as magmas dominantly produced by crustal anatexis. Investigating the zircon of the CASP provides an opportunity to gain further insight into geochemical and isotopic differences of the potential magmatic sources (i.e., crust versus mantle), to identify crustal reservoirs that contributed to the felsic magmas during anatexis, and to quantify the contributions of the respective sources. We present a combined zircon oxygen and hafnium isotope and trace element dataset for 16 volcanic units of the two youngest volcanic phases in Patagonia, dated here with LA-ICP-MS U–Pb geochronology at ca. 148–153 Ma (El Quemado Complex, EQC) and ca. 159 Ma (western Chon Aike Formation, WCA). The EQC zircon have 18O-enriched values (δ18O from 7 to 9.5‰) with correspondingly negative initial εHf values (− 2.0 to − 8.0). The WCA zircon have δ18O values between 6 and 7‰ and εHf values ranging between − 4.0 and + 1.5. Binary δ18O-εHf mixing models require an average of 70 and 60% melt derived from partial melting of isotopically distinct metasedimentary basements for the EQC and WCA, respectively. Zircon trace element compositions are consistent with anatexis of sedimentary protoliths derived from LIL-depleted upper continental crustal sources. The overlap between a high heat flux environment (i.e., widespread extension and lithospheric thinning) during supercontinental breakup and a fertile metasedimentary crust was key in producing voluminous felsic volcanism via anatexis following the injection and emplacement of basaltic magmas into the lower crust.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Silicic large igneous provinces are rare in Earth’s history. As such, they mark an exceptional convergence of conditions necessary to drive predominately explosive eruptions that produce large volumes of silicic magmas (e.g., Gianni and Navarrete 2022) and are intimately linked to supercontinent cycles throughout geologic history (Ernst 2014; Ernst et al. 2021). The Jurassic Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province (CASP) consists of voluminous (ca. 235,000 km3; Pankhurst et al. 1998), crust-dominated felsic magmas generated during a period of widespread extension (Gust et al. 1985; Pankhurst and Rapela 1995; Pankhurst et al. 2000; Riley et al. 2001; Foley et al. 2023). The Jurassic magmatism and concurrent sedimentation occurred in response to the breakup of the Gondwanan supercontinent (Storey and Alabaster 1991; Riley and Leat 1999; Riley et al. 2017; Lovecchio et al. 2020); however, details on the geodynamic environment necessary to generate the observed volume of felsic magma remain under investigation (Navarrete et al. 2019; Bastias et al. 2021).
We focus on the Late Jurassic felsic volcanic units in the Patagonian CASP, including the El Quemado Complex (EQC) in the eastern Andean Cordillera and the western Chon Aike Formation (WCA) in the Deseado Massif (Fig. 1A). Previous isotope measurements of quartz δ18O compositions in these two units are among the highest values in the volcanic record (9–12‰; Foley et al. 2023). Considering that closed-system, mantle-derived rhyolites have δ18O melt values between 6.0 and 6.5‰ (Bindeman et al. 2004; Bindeman 2008), the generation of such high δ18O rhyolite compositions in the CASP requires a significant incorporation of crust-derived material. Such high δ18O values are typically found in rocks formed in low-temperature environments near or at the Earth’s surface. These include siliciclastic and argillic sediments and/or low-temperature, hydrothermally altered rocks (e.g., 10–30‰; Taylor 1980; Taylor and Sheppard 1986; Eiler 2001; Valley et al. 2005; Bindeman 2008). The incorporation of these materials can occur either by extensive assimilation of crustal rocks into mantle-derived melts or by crustal melting with a small contribution of melts from the mantle. Based on the ubiquity of widespread, voluminous high δ18O rhyolites, and their trace element compositions, the EQC and WCA were suggested to represent felsic magmas generated primarily by partial melting of metasedimentary basement lithologies (Foley et al. 2023).
In this study, we present the first combined in situ analyses of U–Pb age data, together with trace element and O– and Lu–Hf isotope measurements from the EQC and WCA ignimbrites and some rhyolite flows to further constrain the age of the volcanic units as well as the geochemical characteristics of the source materials. We show that different source regions are required for the EQC and WCA, based on isotope compositions. The resistance of zircon grains to chemical alteration is important, since many ignimbrites and rhyolite flows in the CASP have been heavily affected by post-magmatic alteration, rendering the use of bulk-rock geochemical data difficult (Riley et al. 2001; Seitz et al. 2018; Foley et al. 2023). Moreover, the potential to combine U–Pb geochronology with Hf and O isotope tracers from a single zircon crystal is vital for constraining crustal evolution through time (e.g., Valley et al. 2005; Hawkesworth and Kemp 2006; Kemp et al. 2007; Vervoort and Kemp 2016). This is particularly important in southern Patagonia where its origin and evolution have remained elusive due to limited basement outcrops from the extended ice cover in the western Andes and burial from extensive volcanism associated with the CASP in the Deseado Massif (Fig. 2). In combination with isotope tracers, we use trace elements (e.g., Ti, U, and REEs) in zircon to constrain petrogenetic processes, including source rock types and conditions of crystallization for the CASP (e.g., Hanchar and Van Westrenen 2007; Grimes et al. 2015; Kirkland et al. 2015). Based on these results, we suggest a geodynamic framework for the generation of the voluminous, crust-dominated rhyolites at the southwest Gondwanan margin during the Late Jurassic.
Geologic background
Due to the limited exposure of basement outcrops, the nature of the continental crust in Patagonia is not well known and has led to long-standing debates about its origin and relationship with the South American continent (Pankhurst et al. 2006; Ramos and Naipauer 2014; Calderón et al. 2016; González et al. 2018; Oriolo et al. 2023). For units that are exposed, the investigated outcrops of basement rocks in Patagonia record a long-lived history of a convergent margin, with episodes of extension and rifting, as well as terrane accretion that is detailed in a series of orogenic phases since the Cambrian (Forsythe 1982; Ramos 1988; Suárez et al. 2019a; Calderón et al. 2020). To trace potential crustal sources for the felsic magmas generated during the Jurassic, we present a summary of basement lithologies associated with the volcanic units studied here.
The igneous basement exposures in southern Patagonia are confined to the eastern half of the Deseado Massif and range in age from Late Neoproterozoic to Triassic (Rapela and Pankhurst 1996; Pankhurst et al. 2003; Navarrete et al. 2019), while, toward the west, the basement rocks are predominately metasedimentary in origin (Fig. 1A). In the western Deseado Massif, the Paleozoic metasedimentary units of the La Modesta and Cerro Negro Formations comprise shallow marine sediments deposited within a forearc/foreland basin along an active mid-Silurian volcanic arc which is represented by exposed granitoids in the eastern Deseado Massif (Guido et al. 2004; Moreira et al. 2013; Permuy-Vidal et al. 2014; Suárez et al. 2019a). The low-grade metamorphosed protoliths of La Modesta Formation are composed of alternating pelitic, metavolcanics, calc-silicates, and graywacke lithologies (Moreira et al. 2005, 2013). Arc migration and the progression of sediment deposition trends westwards, indicated by the decrease in maximum sedimentation ages in the Eastern Andean Metamorphic Complex (EAMC) (ca. 383–240 Ma; Hervé et al. 2003; Augustsson et al. 2006). Locally in the region of Argentina associated with the EQC, the EAMC is referred to as the Bahía de la Lancha Formation and is dominated by low-grade metasediments of turbidite sequences (Riccardi 1971).
During the Jurassic, the outpouring of volcanic rocks associated with the Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province covered ~ 1,000,000 km2 across Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula (Fig. 1), with an estimated volume of 235,000 km3 (Pankhurst et al. 1998). The extrusive units are primarily felsic in composition (> 70 wt. % bulk SiO2) and consist of ignimbrite flows with minor rhyolitic domes, ash flows and falls, and subvolcanic deposits (e.g., Pankhurst et al. 1998; Guido 2004; Moreira et al. 2014; Navarrete et al. 2020; Foley et al. 2022, 2023). Mafic to intermediate rocks in the CASP are minor, occupying an exposed area of ca. 50,000 km2. Many CASP formations consist of volcanic units which have a bimodal distribution between rhyolite and andesite compositions (e.g., Gust et al. 1985; Pankhurst and Rapela 1995; Riley et al. 2001; Matthews et al. 2021).
Previously determined U–Pb zircon crystallization ages in the CASP range from ca. 193 Ma in the Northern Patagonian Massif (e.g., Pavón-Pivetta et al. 2020) to the youngest along the eastern Andean margin at ca. 146 Ma (e.g., Poblete et al. 2013). In Patagonia, the oldest phase of felsic magmatism began in the northeast of the North Patagonian Massif with the Marifil Formation at ca. 180–190 Ma (Pankhurst and Rapela 1995; Pankhurst et al. 2000; Strazzere et al. 2018, 2021; Pavón-Pivetta et al. 2020; Falco et al. 2022) (Fig. 1A). Magmatism continued to the west with primarily mafic volcanism and U–Pb ages ranging from ca. 170–188 Ma in the Lonco Trapial Formation (Franzese et al. 2006; Cúneo et al. 2013; Bouhier et al. 2017; Hauser et al. 2017; Zaffarana et al. 2020).
Recent U–Pb ages measured in the ignimbrites of eastern Deseado Massif extend the duration of the Chon Aike Formation to 30 Myr (Matthews et al. 2021) (Fig. 2). The older ages of ca. 191 Ma correlate in time and composition with the bimodal volcanism in the North Patagonian Massif. From 180 until 167 Ma, volcanism is dominated by felsic compositions in the eastern region of the Deseado Massif (Pankhurst et al. 2000; Navarrete et al. 2020; Matthews et al. 2021). While in the western region, the Chon Aike Formation volcanic units are distinctly younger at ca. 160–156 Ma (Dube et al. 2003; Moreira et al. 2009; Permuy-Vidal et al. 2021) (Fig. 2).
The youngest felsic formations follow along the eastern Andean margin and include the El Quemado Complex (EQC) and its equivalent formations in Chile, the Ibañez and Tobífera Formations (Fig. 1A). Ages for the EQC and Ibañez Formations are reported between 157 and 146 Ma (Pankhurst et al. 2000; Rolando et al. 2004; Poblete et al. 2013; Malkowski et al. 2016; Foley et al. 2022) (Fig. 2). The earliest published age for the Tobífera Formation is 172 ± 1 Ma as determined from a borehole sampled in Tierra del Fuego (Pankhurst et al. 2000); however, more recent U–Pb ages of ca. 149 and 160 Ma were reported for the Tobífera Formation outcropping within the Andes (Calderón et al. 2007; Muller et al. 2021).
In the Antarctic Peninsula, the felsic Mount Poster and Brennecke Formations are coeval with the oldest episodes of Patagonian magmatism at ca.184 to 189 Ma (Pankhurst et al. 2000) (Fig. 1B), while the Maple Formation is distinctly younger, ranging from 173 to 163 Ma (Pankhurst et al. 2000; Scasso et al. 2022).
Methods
Studied volcanic samples and zircon preparation
Zircon grains from 16 samples were separated from felsic volcanic rocks of the El Quemado Complex (EQC) and the western Chon Aike Formation (WCA) that have been previously characterized by Foley et al. (2023). All zircon separated from the EQC (n = 11) are from bulk ignimbrite samples, while the WCA (n = 5) includes three ignimbrite samples and two rhyolitic lava samples (Table 1). We sampled the EQC at four locations along a north–south ~ 230 km transect (Fig. 2) that include ignimbrite profiles at Lago Posadas, Estancia (Ea.), Ensenada (Tucu Tucu), and at Los Cóndores (El Chaltén), and a single ignimbrite from the fourth locality at Lago San Martín (Table 1). For each of the three ignimbrite profiles, zircon grains were separated from both the uppermost and lowermost ignimbrite units. At both Ea. Ensenada and Los Cóndores localities, additional ignimbrites were sampled within the sequence. In the western Deseado Massif, we sampled four different eruptive units from the WCA across a west to east profile that include a rhyolitic flow (Deseado Massif rhyolite), the Las Lajas ignimbrite, the La Josefina Dome, and the Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite (Fig. 2).
Hand samples were coarsely crushed to a size fraction < 500 µm using a hydraulic press. Samples were further crushed using a disk-mill until equal proportions of size fractions ranging between 250 < x < 125 µm, 125 < x < 90 µm, and < 90 µm were obtained. Zircon separates were selected for analysis from both size fractions of 125–250 and 90–125 µm. Phenocrysts of zircon were mounted in epoxy and polished down to obtain a section closest to the center of the crystals. The surfaces of epoxy mounts were checked using a Zeiss White Light Interferometer to ensure a polishing quality which resulted in less than 5 microns of topography to minimize the effects of topography on oxygen isotope measurements during the SIMS sessions (e.g., Kita et al. 2009). Zircon grains were then imaged on a scanning electron microscope at a low resolution to target potential areas of interest for SIMS analysis using a cathodoluminescence (CL) detector attached to a CamScan MV2300 Scanning Electron Microscope. The zircon grains were imaged using an accelerating voltage of ~ 10 kV and current of < 1.0 nA. Low-resolution and low-current images were acquired prior to the SIMS session to minimize the damage induced by the electron beam to the epoxy around zircon grains. Following the SIMS analyses, high-resolution images of zircon grains using longer dwell times were acquired to document the placement of in situ measurements (SIMS and LA-ICP-MS; see below).
Secondary ion mass spectrometry
In situ measurements of 18O/16O ratios were conducted using the Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer (SIMS) at the WiscSIMS facility of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin (USA) using a Cameca IMS 1280 (10 out of 14 samples; Supplementary T1–T2). Four samples were also analyzed at the SwissSIMS facility using the Cameca IMS 1280-HR at the University of Lausanne (Switzerland). The measurements followed the description of Kita et al. (2009) with a 10 kV Cs + primary beam and a ~ 2 nA current, resulting in a beam size of ~ 10 µm. A normal incidence electron gun was used to compensate for charging on the sample surface and tuned at the beginning of each session. The intensities of 18O and 16O ions were analyzed simultaneously on Faraday cups in a multicollection mode with a mass resolving power (MRP) of ~ 2200. In addition, for the session at the WiscSIMS laboratory, to check for radiation damage, 16O1H intensities were measured on the mono-collection faraday cups with a MRP of 5000 to avoid 17O interference. Faraday cup backgrounds were calibrated approximately every 12 h using Cameca’s software. Each analysis consisted of pre-sputtering (~ 30 s), automated centering of secondary deflectors (~ 60 s), and 16 cycles of 4 s counting times. Because the primary beam density was very high, samples analyzed at the WiscSIMS laboratory exhibited a mass-dependent fractionation of the 18O/16O ratios during each individual analysis, i.e., 18O/16O ratios were decreasing over the time of an individual analysis. Similar to what was described in Foley et al. (2023) to correct for the mass-dependent fractionation, a linear regression was fitted for 18O/16O ratios versus cycle numbers for every standard analysis, and then an average slope was used to correct for all analyses. To correct for instrumental bias, the Penglai zircon standard was used as the internal reference standard for all sessions and has an average δ18O of 5.31 ± 0.10 ‰ (Li et al. 2010). To monitor for potential drift over time during the sessions, two to four unknown analyses were bracketed by at least one analysis of Penglai. No drift was observed for the different sessions. The 18O/16O ratios were normalized relative to the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW).
Final uncertainty on individual SIMS δ18O measurements was computed through the propagation of internal error (2SE), reproducibility of standard analyses used to calibrate the unknown analysis (2SE), and the uncertainty on the reference value of Penglai (1SD). Typical reproducibility (2SD) of repeated Penglai analyses was 0.15–0.3‰.
Laser ablation Inductively coupled plasma Mass spectrometry
Following the SIMS measurements, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb analyses were performed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific ELEMENT XR sector-field ICP-MS interfaced to a RESOlution SE 193 nm ArF excimer laser ablation system at the Institute of Earth Sciences, UNIL (Supplementary T3–T5). The methods are described in detail in Ulianov et al. (2012). The ablation system was operated using spot sizes of 20 or 30 µm, with a repetition rate of 5 Hz and fluence of 3 J/cm2. For larger grains, a spot size of 38 µm was used. When possible, U–Pb spots were placed such that they overlapped with SIMS analyses (Figs. 3 and 4). Helium was used as the carrier gas. Natural reference zircon GEMOC GJ-1, with a reported CA-ID-TIMS 206Pb/238U age of 600.28 ± 0.16 (Schaltegger et al. 2021), was used as a primary standard for the determination of the relative sensitivity factors. Natural reference zircon Plešovice was used as a secondary standard for accuracy control (337.207 ± 0.029 Ma; Sláma et al. 2008; Widmann et al. 2019). The isotope homogeneity of the ablated material was monitored on time-resolved 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U spectra, and analyses with irregularly changing ratios through time were interpreted to reflect mixing between different age domains or isotopic disturbance. Such measurements were discarded. Data reduction is carried out using LAMTRACE (Jackson 2008). The U–Pb data are not corrected for common Pb and any analysis with concentrations of enriched 204Pb is excluded from calculation of the weighted mean sample age. Only concordant analyses are included in the calculation of weighted mean sample age (Horn et al. 2000; Gerdes and Zeh 2006). Concordia diagrams and weighted mean crystallization ages are calculated using IsoplotR version 4.3 (Vermeesch 2018) (Supplementary F1–3). Given the excess scatter in all dated rocks, even after removal of anomalously old or young analyses, the reported weighted mean ages of the selected population of analyses may not be accurate within uncertainty determined purely from data scatter. In addition to the error calculated in IsoplotR that we take as a minimum error, we follow the method of Ruiz et al. (2022) in calculating an extended error. This extended error, even though probably overestimated, allows for a more accurate age interpretation from scattering U–Pb dates, which is more important than apparent precision. We report this as an extended error in the format [X] (95% c.l.) / [Y] (extended error) in Table 1.
The reproducibility of GJ-1 in all sessions was 0.60 to 0.90% (2 S.D.). In each session, the secondary standard Plešovice gave a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age that was statistically indistinguishable from its nominal value once the error propagation was performed (Supplementary T4). Over five analytical sessions, a total of 19 analyses (out of 164) of the secondary standards were excluded, 16 for being discordant and three whose ages were clear outliers.
The Lu–Hf isotope measurements were carried out after SIMS δ18O and LA-ICP-MS U–Pb geochronology measurements (Supplementary T6–T8). The Lu–Hf measurements were carried out at the University of Geneva (Switzerland) on a Thermo Neptune Plus MC-ICP-MS connected to a Teledyne-Photon Machines Analyte G2 193 nm ArF excimer laser system, equipped with a two-volume HelEx-2 ablation cell (d’Abzac et al. 2014). The ablation was performed at a fluence of ~ 4 J/cm2, repetition rate of 5 Hz, and spot size of 40 μm; spots were placed such that they partially overlap with U–Pb analyses, when possible. Helium was used as a carrier gas for the ablated particles and mixed with a small amount of N2 before entering the Ar plasma torch to increase sensitivity. Measurements were performed with a low mass resolution over 120 cycles of ~ 1 s; standard grains were ablated for a total of 120 cycles of a duration of 1 s each and the measurements ranged between 20 and 120 cycles, depending on the thickness of the zircon grains (> 80% of analysis range between 60 and 120 cycles). Each series of ~ 15–20 unknown sample measurements was bracketed by measurements of a blank, Mud Tank (176Hf/177Hf 0.282507 ± 0.000006 2SD; Woodhead and Hergt 2005; Gain et al. 2019), Plešovice (176Hf/177Hf 0.282482 ± 0.000013 2SD; Sláma et al. 2008), MUN4 (176Hf/177Hf 0.282135 ± 0.000007; Fisher et al. 2011), and GJ-1 (176Hf/177Hf 0.282000 ± 0.000005; Morel et al. 2008) zircon standards. The four standards are measured and evaluated in real time during the analysis to evaluate the offset of the measured values to reference values. Blanks were acquired for the full 120 cycles (without ablation) and for the same time interval as the zircon standard measurements.
Data were reduced off-line using an excel spreadsheet and consisted of blank subtractions, removing the isobaric interference of 176Lu and 176Yb on mass 176 (e.g., Fisher et al. 2011) and correcting the resulting 176Hf/177Hf ratio for mass bias using an exponential law (Albarède et al. 2004). βHf and βYb mass bias coefficients were calculated from the measured 179Hf/177Hf and 173Yb/171Yb with the reference values of Patchett and Tatsumoto (1981) (179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325) and Thirlwall and Anczkiewicz (2004) (173Yb/171Yb = 1.1234), respectively. Isobaric interferences of 176Yb and 176Lu with 176Hf were corrected using 176Yb/173Yb = 0.786954 and 176Lu/175Lu = 0.02645 respectively (Thirlwall and Anczkiewicz 2004). Only non-perturbed spectra were retained. Initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios and epsilon notation (εHfT) values are calculated using the LA-ICP-MS 206Pb/238U age of the corresponding crystal and the CHUR parameters of Bouvier et al. (2008) (176Hf/177Hf = 0.282785 and 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0336) and λ176Lu = 1.87 × 10–11/year (Söderlund et al. 2004).
Trace elements in zircon were determined using the Thermo ELEMENT XR sector-field ICP-MS interfaced to the RESOlution SE 193 nm excimer laser ablation system that was also used for the U–Pb dating of zircon (Supplementary T9-T10). Ablation settings included a fluence of 5 J cm−2 with a 10 Hz repetition rate and beam diameters ranging between 20 and 38 μm, using the maximum size when possible to maximize the net signal. 27Al, 42Ca, 88Sr, and 137Ba were analyzed to screen for analyses that correspond to alteration or mineral inclusions, in addition to 29Si, 45Sc, 49Ti, 89Y, 91Zr, 93Nb, 139La, 140Ce, 141Pr, 143Nd, 147Sm, 151Eu, 157Gd, 159 Tb, 163Dy, 165Ho, 166Er, 169Tm, 172Yb, 175Lu, 178Hf, 181Ta, 232Th, and 238U. Measurements were placed next to the SIMS spots for maximum correlation between the O isotope and trace element concentration data. SRM612 was employed as the primary standard; BCR-2G glass was measured along with unknown zircon grains and used as the secondary standard for quality control. Data reduction was conducted using LAMTRACE (Jackson 2008).
Results
We first report the results of SEM-CL imaging, followed by the radiogenic (U–Pb, Lu–Hf) and O isotope measurements carried out within single zircon crystals. It is noted that zircon analyses have the corresponding quartz δ18O data in Foley et al. (2023) that allow for the calculation of mineral pair isotope equilibrium temperatures. Zircon and quartz pairs were analyzed from the same hand sample, except for the Deseado Massif rhyolite flow where quartz and zircon grains were analyzed from different samples in the same flow (quartz from sample DMMF2 and zircon from DMMF1).
We distinguish zircon populations as either Jurassic autocrystic grains, which are thought to have directly precipitated from the host melt, or as older inherited grains derived from a contributing source material and/or entrained via assimilation-related contamination.
Zircon morphology
Jurassic autocrystic zircon
Zircon phenocrysts range in morphology from long and prismatic (parallel to the c-axis) to rounded and short (Fig. 3). Many zircon grains are euhedral and have width-to-length ratios between ~ 1:2 and 1:4. There is typically a subset of the zircon population with an aspect ratio of up to 1:10.
Cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging of hundreds of zircon grains per sample reveals large variability in morphology and texture within each sample and across the volcanic units studied (Fig. 3). Many of the EQC autocrystic zircon have fine-scale oscillatory zonation, with subtle variations in grayscale intensity (Fig. 3). The WCA zircon has a larger variability in CL textures between the different units studied. The zircon grains of the La Josefina Dome are consistently homogeneously black with thin (< 10 μm) gray rims (Fig. 3). Many WCA zircon grains are characterized by oscillatory zonation, though individual growth bands are significantly darker (to black) on average when compared to the EQC zircon. Inclusions are present in zircon of both the EQC and WCA, with apatite inclusions the most abundant in the WCA.
Inherited zircon
Multiple inherited cores were identified based on distinct changes in CL textures (Fig. 4); growth surfaces are truncated by dissolution surfaces that are then overgrown by the euhedral, oscillatory growth zones of magmatic zircon. Inherited cores have CL patterns that range from homogeneous to oscillatory. The sizes of inherited cores range from < 20 μm to ~ 75 μm. Similarly, the range in length scale of overgrowth varies between individual grains, from the smallest at < 20 μm (c-axis) to thicker overgrowths of ~ 80 μm (Fig. 4).
U–Pb geochronology
A summary of the 750 U–Pb spot analyses, including the 206Pb/238U average zircon crystallization ages, the number of analyses used for each age determination, and dates of inherited zircon cores for each sample, is presented in Table 1. Inherited zircon cores are listed with their corresponding 206Pb/238U date. For zircon older than 900 Ma, the 207Pb/206Pb dates are also indicated (Supplementary T5), as it is the more accurate chronometer for older grains.
The mean weighted LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon crystallization age for each volcanic unit is calculated using the largest plateau of concordant analyses that overlap within uncertainty (Supplementary F3). For the samples dated here, our preferred interpretation does not significantly alter the calculated age of the volcanic unit, but it does narrow the final uncertainty associated with the age.
Zircon crystallization ages: El Quemado Complex
The order of descriptions for the four localities sampled for the EQC follows the 230 km north–south transect along the eastern Andean margin (Fig. 2). The two ignimbrites at Lago Posadas, sampled from the upper- and lowermost portion of the sequence have similar average ages at 147.6 ± 0.4/3.2 and 148.1 ± 0.45/3.2 Ma, respectively (Table 1). Further south, the weighted mean zircon 206Pb/238U ages for the three ignimbrites at Estancia (Ea.) Ensenada (Tucu Tucu) range from 151.5 ± 0.41/3.3 Ma in the uppermost capping ignimbrite (EEMF10) to 152.6 ± 0.7/3.4 Ma in the lowermost ignimbrite (EEMF9). The zircon crystallization age determined for a third ignimbrite sampled below the uppermost ignimbrite unit is 152.3 ± 1/3.4 Ma (EEMF11). The fourth sample taken from within an interlayered volcanoclastic sequence underlying the main ignimbrite sequence was dated at 154.3 ± 0.4/3.3 Ma (EEMF4). At Lago San Martin, the average zircon crystallization age for an ignimbrite is 150.4 ± 0.7/3.3 Ma (LSMMF1). At the southernmost locality sampled for the EQC, four ignimbrites were dated from the 220 m thick sequence at the Los Cóndores wall in El Chaltén. The average zircon crystallization ages for both the uppermost (LCMF12) and lowermost ignimbrite (LCMF1) units are almost identical at 149.1 ± 0.5/3.3 and 148.4 ± 0.6/3.2 Ma. An additional ignimbrite that overlies the lowermost ignimbrite (LCMF1) was dated at 147.6 ± 0.4/3.2 Ma (LCMF4). The fourth ignimbrite (LCMF14) was sampled along the Los Cóndores wall, but to the north of the main sample profile. The average zircon crystallization age is also 148 ± 0.4/3.2 Ma.
Combined, the 206Pb/238U zircon crystallization ages for the EQC ignimbrites range from 148 to 153 Ma (Supplementary F1), with most of the dates clustering around 150 Ma. The northern and southernmost localities are similar in age at 148 to 149 Ma, while the Ea. Ensenada section is slightly older. At the three locations of Lago Posadas, Ea. Ensenada, and El Chaltén, upper and lower ignimbrites have average crystallization ages that are within error (Table 1).
Zircon crystallization ages: western Chon Aike Formation (Deseado Massif)
Concordant 206Pb/238U dates for four WCA samples range from 144 to 167 Ma (n = 88), with the weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages ranging from 157.5 to 159 Ma (Table 1, Supplementary F1). There is no spatial trend in the average crystallization age, with the westernmost rhyolitic dome (DM rhyolite) and the easternmost sample (Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite) overlaps within uncertainty with weighted mean ages of 159.4 ± 0.5/3.4 (DMMF1) and 158.2 ± 0.7/3.4 (DMMF3). The two samples of the Las Lajas ignimbrite slightly differ in age, with the youngest age, 157.5 ± 1.05/3.5 Ma (LLMF6), determined for the poorly welded portion of the ignimbrite and 158.1 ± 0.6/3.4 Ma (LLMF3) for the densely welded portion of the ignimbrite.
The rhyolite dome at La Josefina (LMJMF3) is the oldest unit dated in this study, with an average zircon crystallization age of 178.5 ± 0.4/3.8 Ma. This average crystallization age was determined with the largest plateau of overlapping analyses (Fig. 5B), but concordant analyses range from 168 to 181 Ma.
Inherited zircon dates
Multiple concordant inherited zircon cores were analyzed within the EQC zircon with overall dates ranging from 171 to 2756 Ma (n = 37; Table 1). At Lago Posadas, concordant inherited dates include 464 ± 5 and 513 ± 4 Ma from the uppermost ignimbrite [LPMF1] (Fig. 4) and a single concordant inherited core in the lowermost [LPMF10] ignimbrite yielded a date of 567 ± 5 Ma. At Ea. Ensenada, two inherited cores at 213 ± 10 and 523 ± 11 Ma were analyzed in an upper unit [EEMF9], while the lowermost unit [EEMF4] yielded two older dates of 634 ± 4 Ma (206Pb/238U) and 2697 ± 8 Ma (207Pb/206Pb), which is the oldest zircon core analyzed in this study (Fig. 4). A single date of 544 ± 6 Ma was analyzed within LSMMF1 (Fig. 4). The four Los Cóndores ignimbrite samples have more inherited zircon cores than all other EQC localities, with the LCMF14 ignimbrite encompassing most of the inherited dates with 16 out of 29 analyses with ages ranging from Late Triassic to oldest Paleoproterozoic (Table 1).
Five inherited cores were analyzed from each of the WCA volcanic rock sampled, but surprisingly, only one analysis was concordant in the Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite at 1254 ± 40 Ma (207Pb/206Pb) (Supplementary T5).
Oxygen and hafnium isotope geochemistry
The Lu–Hf systematics of the studied samples is presented as the initial εHfT values, with respect to the CHUR, based on the corresponding 206Pb/238U crystallization age measured from the same zircon domain; if a zircon yielded a discordant U–Pb analysis, the average zircon crystallization age of the sample was used (Supplementary T8). Because Hf isotope values vary systematically with δ18O values in the EQC and WCA, the isotope compositions are presented together below.
Jurassic autocrystic zircon from the EQC
The EQC zircon δ18O values (n = 161) cover a range from 5.7 to 10.0‰, with all but three values clustering in the narrow range from 7.1 to 9.5‰ (Fig. 5A). In fact, 70% of the oxygen isotope compositions from the EQC zircon are between 8 and 9‰ (n = 113). Measurements from core to rim in the same zircon typically do not exhibit significant intra-grain compositional variations, even in instances where complex CL zonation is observed (e.g., Lago Posadas and Ea. Ensenada; Fig. 3). Many of the zircon analyses have very consistent δ18O values for a single grain, within the analytical uncertainty of ± 0.2‰ (Supplementary T2). A few outliers in the EQC data are attributed to inherited cores (see below), which have variable oxygen isotope compositions and have significantly older U–Pb dates (gray symbols, Fig. 5A). Notably, the two ignimbrites from Lago Posadas have the lowest δ18O values (lowest value of 5.7‰) and more isotopic inter-grain variability than the other three EQC localities. The zircon of LPMF10 have the largest oxygen isotope variability for all units studied; autocrystic cores range from 7.1 to 9.2‰, while rim analyses range from 5.7 to 8.6‰ (Fig. 5A).
Initial hafnium isotopic values in the EQC range from − 2.2 to − 8.1 εHf, excluding two outliers of 0.0 and − 9.8 (Fig. 6A). The negative hafnium isotope values of − 5.0 to − 8.1 correspond to the three EQC localities with the highest zircon oxygen isotope compositions (7.9–10.0‰) (Fig. 7). The zircon of the Lago Posadas ignimbrites with initial hafnium values of − 2.0 to − 4.5 correspond to the lowest δ18O, relatively, with values falling between 7.1 and 8.4‰.
Jurassic autocrystic zircon from the WCA
The hafnium and oxygen isotope compositions of zircon from the WCA show less variability per sample, with most analysis falling in between 6 and 7‰ δ18O (Fig. 5B) with the corresponding εHf values of + 1 to − 3.0 (Fig. 6A). The La Josefina rhyolite has an average hafnium isotopic composition of -2.3 (-1.5 to -4.1) and oxygen isotopic values ranging from 7 to 8‰ (Figs. 6 and 7). The Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite (DMMF3) ranges in hafnium composition from + 0.7 to − 2.4 (Fig. 6A), although it is similar in its oxygen isotope compositions with the DM rhyolite and Las Lajas ignimbrite with δ18O values of 6.2–8.0‰. Core to rim compositional variations are only observed in the Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite, with three core analyses of 7.5–8.0‰, overlapping with the compositions of the La Josefina rhyolite (Fig. 5B), and the corresponding rim compositions of 6.2 and 7.0‰ (Fig. 3). A single zircon in the Cerro Jorge Paz ignimbrite shows decoupling of the δ18O–Hf isotopic compositions (Fig. 3), where the rim has a lower oxygen isotope value of 6.2‰ with a negative εHf value of − 0.9, while the core has a higher value of 8.0‰ with an εHf of + 0.6.
Inherited zircon
Many of the inherited cores have an oxygen isotope composition similar to the values in the EQC zircon, or higher. In the Los Cóndores samples, most of the inherited cores are lower in δ18O ranging from 4.5 to 7.5‰ (Fig. 4; Table 2). Initial hafnium values in all samples also have a large range for the measured cores, ranging from + 1.2 to − 36.2. (Table 2). Plotting εHfT through time (Fig. 6B) shows an evolution toward an increase in crustal-derived εHf values (i.e., decreasing εHf values) from the oldest cores of Grenvillian (1368 Ma, + 7.5 εHf) to Permian ages (283 Ma, − 5.1 εHf), with most of the inherited cores evolving along a similar slope.
Oxygen isotope values are not systematically correlated with its U-Pb date in the same crystal, with high values (> 8.5‰) measured in both young (231 ± 10 Ma) and old (1068 ± 144 Ma) inherited cores (Fig. 6C). Many of the analyzed cores display high δ18O values (> 7‰) through time, suggesting a long-lived history of crust-derived magmatic sources.
Zircon trace elements
Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) trends in the EQC and WCA zircon show typical patterns of increasing concentration from light to heavy REE and have positive Ce and negative Eu anomalies (Fig. 8). There are no major differences in these trends between the two formations, though the WCA units have overall slightly higher REE concentrations than those of the EQC (Supplementary T10). An exception is the La Josefina rhyolite. Although it similarly has a REE pattern showing a positive Ce and a negative Eu anomaly, it also shows a steady decrease in heavy REE (Fig. 8). This is consistent with the bulk-rock REE pattern for LMJMF3, where a depletion in heavy REE is also observed (Foley et al. 2023).
To help us discern potential melting sources at depth, we use the discrimination diagrams of Grimes et al. (2015) and compare the EQC and WCA to zircon compositions that derive from known tectono-magmatic settings (Fig. 9). We outline the compositional fields for zircon that crystallized from melts originating in evolving rifts, continental arcs, continental hotspots, or MORB (mid-ocean ridge basalts) using the compilation dataset presented in Carley et al. (2014). Trace element plots show similar patterns between the EQC and WCA volcanic rocks. Zircon trace element compositions plot tightly for most samples in the continental hotspot field, based on zircon data from the Yellowstone caldera (Stelten et al. 2013); however, there is also a strong overlap with the continental arc field (Fig. 9). To better visualize the trends in trace element data, we excluded the La Josefina rhyolite from Fig. 9, due to the extremely high U concentrations (420–15,500 ppm) and depleted Yb concentrations (10–20 ppm), resulting in U/Yb values of 425–1190. Additional plots are available in Supplementary F4.
Magmatic temperature constraints
We estimate the temperature of zircon saturation using the thermometer of Watson and Harrison (1983). We assume that Zr behaved as an immobile element during post-eruption hydrothermal alteration and that alteration was not strong enough to change the overall mass significantly. The temperatures are calculated for each sample using the measured bulk-rock Zr concentration (ppm). The application of the zircon saturation equation depends on knowledge of the coefficient M = [Na + K + 2*Ca)/(Al*Si)], which was found to be a good proxy for the melt composition. Due to post-emplacement hydrothermal alteration, the bulk-rock samples have M values that range from 0.6 to 2.0 (Foley et al. 2023). A value of 1.4 was assumed based on the M value calculated for the least altered Las Lajas ignimbrite samples. This is in good agreement with typical values obtained for rhyolites, though differences in the estimated value for M result in relatively small errors in the calculated temperature (e.g., Miller et al. 2003). Zircon saturation temperatures for the EQC range from 730 to 820 °C (average 785 °C), while the WCA samples range from 710 to 780 °C with a lower average of 760 °C (Fig. 10).
Measurements of in situ zircon titanium concentrations and the Ti-in-zircon thermometer (Ferry and Watson 2007) were used to calculate the temperature of the melt at the time of zircon crystallization. We assume that the activity (α) of TiO2 is restricted between ~ 0.6 and 1 (Watson and Harrison 2005) and that αSiO2 = 1 given the evolved nature of the silica-rich magmas and large size of the quartz phenocrysts (> 1–3 mm; Foley et al. 2023). In our case, rutile saturation cannot be assumed at the time of zircon crystallization; thus, calculated temperatures are subject to uncertainty related to αTiO2. Average zircon Ti contents ranged from 8 to 16 ppm for the EQC (total individual analyses variations are 3 to 32 ppm) and 5 to 12 ppm (total individual analyses variations are 3 to 22 ppm) for the WCA. These average Ti contents translate into temperatures ranging from 775 to 850 °C and 730 to 815 °C (Fig. 10), respectively, for αTiO2 = 0.6. Assuming a higher αTiO2 of 0.8 would result in a decrease of ~ 30 °C.
Oxygen isotope values of zircon–quartz pairs
We combine the detailed in situ oxygen isotope datasets for zircon and quartz phenocrysts extracted from the same bulk-rock sample (see Foley et al. 2023 for quartz SIMS δ18O values). To test for oxygen isotope equilibrium between quartz and zircon phenocrysts, their δ18O values should exhibit temperature-dependent fractionation with a fractionation factor (1000lnα ≈ δ18Oquartz–δ18Ozircon) between 2.4 and 3.3‰ at 900–700 °C, respectively (Zheng 1993). The isotope equilibrium lines for this temperature range along with the quartz–zircon paired measurements are shown in Fig. 11. Given that both mineral phases were extracted from bulk-rock separates, the original (i.e., magmatic) textural information was lost. Thus, without quartz–zircon pairs measured in direct contact, we plot the full range of δ18O values measured using kernel density estimates (KDE). The total range of δ18O values for each phase is illustrated by an open box and the region corresponding to the interquartile range of the δ18O measured values for each mineral is indicated by a shaded area.
The interquartile range of the δ18O values measured in EQC quartz and zircon plot largely between the equilibrium temperatures of 900 and 700 °C, with mean values closer to 800 °C. In comparison, the interquartile range for the quartz–zircon pairs from the WCA volcanic rocks (excluding LMJMF3) plot consistently in the lower temperature equilibration region, reaching below 700 °C. The La Josefina rhyolite exhibits an area with a similar range of δ18O quartz–zircon fractionation values to those of the EQC. Overall, the large range of δ18O values that plot outside the lines of equilibrium indicate that many zircon–quartz pairs are not in isotopic equilibrium for all 16 volcanic rocks considered.
Discussion
CASP U–Pb geochronology
The addition of 16 new samples dated by zircon U–Pb geochronology reveals that the EQC and WCA record distinct pulses of voluminous felsic volcanism in the CASP. The temporal progression of CASP magmatism documented by zircon U–Pb ages is overall consistent with a westward transition across Patagonia toward the paleo-Pacific margin (Pankhurst et al. 2000). However, the WCA and EQC remain unique in the CASP having a linear geometry of north–south coeval magmatism along > 200 km strike in the western Deseado Massif which progresses southwesterly until the cessation of the magmatic flare-up(s) marked by the eruptions of the EQC and Ibáñez Formations along the eastern Andean margin (Fig. 2).
The three WCA units dated within the western Deseado Massif closely overlap in age at ca. 159 Ma (Fig. 2). Only the rhyolite dome at the La Modesta locality is clearly older and unique in the western Deseado Massif at ~ 179 Ma, even when compared to the previously published U–Pb ages further north (ca. 156–159 Ma; Lopez 2006; Permuy-Vidal et al. 2021) and south (ca. 159–160 Ma; Dube et al. 2003; Moreira et al. 2009). This older age of 179 Ma overlaps with earlier phases of CASP volcanism within the North Patagonian Massif and in the eastern Deseado Massif (Navarrete et al. 2020; Matthews et al. 2021). The geochronology data of Matthews et al. (2021) for a succession of volcanic and subvolcanic felsic rocks reveal an extended history of magmatism in the eastern Deseado Massif that ranges from ca. 191 to 180 Ma and partially overlaps with the oldest CASP formations in the North Patagonian Massif. Collectively, ages of zircon U–Pb for the WCA indicate that magmatism progressed westerly across the Deseado Massif from ~ 191 to 160 Ma. The ages of magmatism in the western Deseado Massif are temporally distinct from those in the east, with an average zircon crystallization age of ca. 160 Ma (Fig. 2), which is why we choose to distinguish between western and eastern domains of the Chon Aike Formation.
The youngest felsic volcanism in the CASP is marked by the eruptions of the EQC that have a very narrow range of crystallization ages from 148 to 153 Ma. These zircon crystallization ages from the EQC ignimbrites document that there is no temporal trend from north to south along the eastern Andean Cordillera margin (Fig. 2). The ages presented here lie within the larger age range reported by SHRIMP and LA-ICP-MS U–Pb ages in the literature for the EQC, ranging from 147 to 156 Ma for correlative ignimbrite units (Pankhurst et al. 2000; Malkowski et al. 2016; Foley et al. 2022).
Identifying magma sources in southern Patagonia
Considering the overall prolonged ca. 45 Myr duration of magmatism in the CASP, the EQC and the WCA magmatism occurred relatively close in space and time at ca. 150 and 159 Ma, respectively. Yet, the two formations exhibit distinct ranges of zircon oxygen and Hf isotope values. The zircon from the felsic melts of the EQC have characteristically high δ18O values from 7 to 9.5‰ (Fig. 5) and non-radiogenic initial εHf values (− 2.3 to − 8.1; Fig. 6), in comparison with the WCA zircon that have δ18O values ranging from 6 to 8‰ and the corresponding εHfT values of − 4.0 to + 1.5. Notably, all CASP zircon measured have oxygen isotope values higher than zircon values in equilibrium with the mantle or with a mafic crust (e.g., 5.3 ± 0.6‰; Valley et al. 1998, 2005; Valley 2003) and a non-radiogenic Hf composition. Combined, these zircon compositions require contribution from 18O-enriched and older, low-εHf non-radiogenic felsic crustal material.
To quantify the amount of crustal input, we calculated two-component mixing curves in δ18O-εHf space using calculated melt isotope compositions for the EQC and WCA (Fig. 12). The δ18O compositions of melt were computed from δ18O zircon values, using an average equilibrium temperature of 800 ± 50 °C for felsic rocks with a Δ18Ozircon-melt = − 1.8‰ (Bindeman et al. 2007). The EQC and WCA are both correlated to the region of southern Patagonia that is dominated by metasedimentary basement lithologies (Fig. 1), which are distinguished by their differences in maximum depositional ages. Although they are lithologically similar, Foley et al. (2023) showed that they differ in their bulk δ18O composition. Hence, we modeled each volcanic formation using the isotope compositions of each respective basement formation. For the EQC, we modeled the crustal endmember using the average bulk isotope value of the metasedimentary Bahía de la Lancha Formation (δ18O = 12‰; Foley et al. 2023). The εHfT value is calculated using the equation of Vervoort et al. (2011) with the bulk-rock εNdT value of − 6.6 measured in the same formation (Augustsson and Bahlburg 2003; Table 3). For the WCA, the crustal endmember is modeled using the La Modesta Formation with a bulk-rock δ18O value of 10‰ (Foley et al. 2023). Without published radiogenic isotope values for basement lithologies in the Deseado Massif, we estimated the εHf160 value to be − 5.0 using the average εNdT value measured in the andesitic Bajo Pobre Formation, assuming this reflects the most juvenile value derived from partial melting of the crustal precursor (εNdT range from − 3.8 to − 4.2; Pankhurst and Rapela 1995).
The geometry of the δ18O–Hf isotope array places constraints on the mixing process since the curvature is controlled predominately by the relative abundance of Hf in the endmembers. For both the EQC and WCA volcanic rocks, the isotope values cannot be reproduced via endmember mixing of the respective crustal source with either a depleted mantle or an enriched mantle source (Fig. 12A, B). Due to the concentrations of hafnium in either of the two mantle domains (e.g., DM = 0.157 ppm Hf, Workman and Hart 2005; EM-II = 8 ppm Hf; Willbold and Stracke 2006), both models result in a distinct curvature not seen in our data (Fig. 12 A, B). Instead, the near linear trends observed in both the EQC and WCA data (Fig. 12) require Hf concentrations in the mantle endmember which are closer to the crustal source (~ 3–5 ppm). Such mantle sources could be like those that produced the Hf isotopic compositions in zircon from the Amarga gabbro (ca. 29–30 Ma; Müntener et al. 2018) in the Torres del Paine Intrusive Complex (εHfT = + 8.1; Ewing et al. 2018) and the Navarrete granodiorite (ca. 281 Ma; Pankhurst et al. 2006) in the North Patagonian Massif (εHfT = + 4.0; Castillo et al. 2017). Without actual corresponding oxygen isotope data for these two model endmembers, we make assumptions on their δ18O composition and consider the effect of an enriched oxygen isotope composition (Fig. 12C, D). Given that these mantle-derived compositions have altered Hf isotope compositions due to subduction-related contamination of the underlying subcontinental lithospheric mantle, it is likely that their oxygen isotope compositions are similarly enriched relative to the depleted mantle value of 5.5 ± 0.2‰ (Mattey et al. 1994; Eiler 2001). We base our model endmembers using enriched oxygen values measured in arc systems (e.g., > 6‰ up to 7‰ δ18O; Bindeman et al. 2005; Dallai et al. 2019; González-Maurel et al. 2020; Cornet et al. 2022).
The covariant δ18O–Hf zircon arrays in Fig. 12 illustrate the interaction between two endmember components: (1) a modified (i.e., enriched) subcontinental lithospheric mantle and (2) metasedimentary basement lithologies. Based on the trajectories of the isotope arrays between the EQC and WCA, the mantle-derived material sourced from the subcontinental lithospheric mantle is modified beneath both the Andean Cordillera and the western Deseado Massif regions. The EQC values lie between the isotope values of the Amarga gabbro and the Navarrete granodiorite, with an enriched oxygen endmember (δ18O = 7.0‰) of the Navarrete granodiorite reproducing much of the EQC values (Fig. 12C). In the Deseado Massif, the WCA values are similarly modeled using the Navarrete granodiorite, though requiring a slightly less enriched oxygen isotope source (δ18O = 6.5‰; Fig. 12D). Given the difference in age to the Jurassic rhyolites, their relatively small volumes, and their distances to the EQC and WCA volcanic rocks, they are not the source region. Nevertheless, the Amarga gabbro and the Navarrete granodiorite document the presence of modified and enriched mantle compositions in the area that have persisted at least since the Permian and continued until the Paleogene in Patagonia. These mixing models are consistent with magmatic sources modeled for the genesis of the Permian granitoids in the North Patagonian Massif and in Tierra del Fuego (e.g., Castillo et al. 2017) and suggest commonality in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle compositions along the eastern half of Patagonia. The presence of multiple, unique mantle domains within Patagonia is supported by geochemical and isotopic studies of mantle xenoliths (e.g., Mundl et al. 2015; Schilling et al. 2017) and is discussed further in the following section (see Constraints on the crustal evolution of southern Patagonia).
Even with an enriched mantle source, the EQC and WCA are crust-dominated systems derived by melting of lithologies of similar composition (e.g., Foley et al. 2023). This is further supported by the consistencies in zircon trace element geochemistry between the two volcanic formations (Fig. 9). Hence, we interpret that the differences between the EQC and WCA zircon isotope values primarily reflect changes in the isotope composition of the basement source between the eastern Andean region and the western Deseado Massif, in addition to slight differences in relative proportions of endmember mixing where the WCA requires as much as 60% of a melted metasedimentary crust while EQC is closer to 70% on average (Fig. 12). The high δ18O values in the EQC (autocrystic zircon values of 7–9.5‰) reflect a crustal source region with similarly high δ18O values. In comparison, although the WCA zircon δ18O values are not as enriched as the EQC (Fig. 5), they nevertheless represent a crust-dominated system (Fig. 12). Thus, tracing the origin of high-δ18O magmas is demonstrated in this difference between the EQC and WCA: producing a magma with resulting high δ18O value requires both a source with an elevated bulk-rock δ18O (> 10‰) composition and significant mass contribution (> 50–90%) during partial melting.
Magma genesis
The two-component zircon mixing models for the EQC and WCA indicate a dominant felsic crustal component in the magmatic source (e.g., > 50–80% by mass; Fig. 12). To generate the large volumes of felsic magmas observed (ca. 10,000 km3 and 20,000 km3 for the EQC and WCA, respectively; Pankhurst et al. 1998), a petrogenetic model that satisfies the following observations is required: (1) widespread and voluminous production of felsic magmas with isotope compositions that suggest open-system mixing between crustal and enriched mantle sources, and (2) effective mixing and homogenization of magma batches across the affected region, prior to the rapid eruption of explosive material suggested by U–Pb zircon crystallization ages within the EQC and WCA, which are often within error of the method.
Hybrid magmas are difficult to achieve thermally within the shallow, cold crust, as the heat available for crustal melting and/or assimilation is limited by the volume of injected mafic magmas (e.g., Annen and Sparks 2002; Annen et al. 2006). Therefore, our observations for the EQC and WCA are more consistent with the generation of felsic magmas primarily within a hot crustal environment found in either the lower crust or at a relatively shallow depth in an extensional environment. Based on phase petrology, Foley et al. (2023) suggested that anatexis is most efficient at lower pressures (~ 5 kbar). Combining these arguments, we suggest that crustal melting occurred at the base of an extended, thinned crust. Rapid extension would provide the hot ambient temperatures necessary for significant crustal melting and mixing. The δ18O-εHf mixing models suggest open-system mixing with mantle melts (Fig. 12), whereby magmas were modified in crustal MASH zones (mixing, assimilation, storage, and homogenization; Hildreth and Moorbath 1988), with heat primarily provided in the form of basaltic underplating (e.g., Bergantz 1989; Dufek and Bergantz 2005). Efficient mixing between distinct melt sources in the thinned lower crust led to the development of intermediate to felsic magmas with a hybridized and uniform isotopic signature (Riley et al. 2001).
Interestingly, any trace of the history of open-system hybridization was not recorded in the zircon crystal record, as both the intra- and inter-sample isotopic records are homogeneous and with no difference in isotope values between zircon core and rim values (Figs. 3 and 4). Both the scale of isotope homogeneity (e.g., north to south through the EQC and west to east through the WCA) and the consistency of isotope values within different zircon populations for each sample suggest that zircon saturation occurred after homogenization. For most samples, zircon δ18O values have greater variation within a given sample population (9 out of 14 samples have a variance > 1.0‰; Fig. 5) than the corresponding phenocrystic quartz (all < 1.0‰). One explanation for the divergence in isotopic equilibrium could be that zircon records a longer history of magmatic evolution (i.e., saturation prior to quartz) and/or some of the zircon grains are antecrystic and recycled from an earlier phase of magmatism (e.g., Miller et al. 2007; Gaynor et al. 2023). However, based on petrographical observations, we determine that quartz was not a late-stage crystallizing phase. Quartz phenocrysts are often large (> 1–3 mm; Foley et al. 2023) and are similar in size to coexisting feldspar phenocrysts, thus supporting a long magmatic history. Additionally, neither quartz nor zircon δ18O values change through time, as both the lower and upper ignimbrites from an eruptive sequence in the EQC do not significantly change in composition (Fig. 11). Therefore, we conclude that the oxygen isotope disequilibrium between quartz and zircon more likely reflects crystallization in spatially discrete melt pockets within a single reservoir, such that each phase inherits the isotopic composition from only the immediate melt (e.g., Bindeman and Melnik 2016).
Constraints on the crustal evolution of southern Patagonia
Given the high crustal proportions involved in magma genesis, isotopic measurements within the CASP volcanic rocks provide an indirect sampling of the crustal reservoirs of Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula. Broadly used, depleted mantle Hf model ages (TDM) provide constraints on the timing of melt extraction events (e.g., DePaolo et al. 1991). Here, we assume a linear evolution of Lu/Hf = 0.015 (Goodge and Vervoort 2006) for a newly extracted crust through time. To delineate some uncertainties involved in using zircon Hf model ages in comparison to bulk-rock model ages, we combine tracers of oxygen and Hf isotopes in zircon to provide a relative constraint on the measure of reworked older continental crust (Hf) along with the incorporation of supracrustal material (oxygen isotopes). Zircon with 18O-enriched isotope compositions reflect periods of crustal reworking, hence, the calculated TDM age reflects mixing between a mantle-derived source (often assumed to be depleted mantle) and a crustal source (e.g., Dhuime et al. 2012; Cornet et al. 2022).
In the Deseado Massif, the average age for the formation of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle is estimated to be 1.5 Ga, calculated using Re–Os isotopic data from mantle xenoliths (e.g., Mundl et al. 2015; Schilling et al. 2017), while model ages in the Andean region are considerably younger at ca. 1.0 Ga. Interestingly, bulk Neodymium model ages for the Bahía de la Lancha in the Andean region are older than the mantle xenolith model ages and are instead closer in age to those of the Deseado Massif at ca. 1.3–1.5 Ga (Fig. 13) and support their sediment origin from the active margin in the eastern Deseado Massif during the Paleozoic (Augustsson and Bahlburg 2003). Although the La Modesta Formation does not have complementary radiogenic values, it likely has radiogenic compositions close to those of Bahía de la Lancha Formation as they represent sediments derived from a similar source (Permuy-Vidal et al. 2014).
In the EQC, hafnium TDM ages of > 1.0–1.2 Ga support derivation from recycling of the Paleozoic Bahía de la Lancha sediments in the lower crust (Fig. 13A). The younger ages of < 1.0 Ga at Lago Posadas are consistent with increasing input from mantle sources. In the Deseado Massif, the andesitic Bajo Pobre Formation, which is generated via partial melting of the lower crust and considered a parental magma for the CA Formation (e.g., Pankhurst and Rapela 1995), has Nd TDM ages of ca. 1.3 Ga. Although this age for the Bajo Pobre Formation is consistent with the ages of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle formation, it is unclear if it represents the age of a lower crustal formation at this time, or the ages of its sedimentary provenance (i.e., La Modesta Formation). In comparison, Hf TDM ages in the WCA are significantly younger (average 900 Ma) and reflect a greater proportion of mixing between crustal and mantle sources (Fig. 13B).
In addition to depleted mantle model ages, combining U–Pb with oxygen and hafnium isotope measurements in EQC inherited zircon provides valuable insights on the isotopic evolution of the crustal sources in southern Patagonia. If the Hf isotope composition of the crustal source material followed an inferred Lu–Hf crustal evolution path, zircon with similar model ages might originate from similar crustal domains with consistent TDM ages of 1.0 to 1.5 Ga in zircon with the corresponding U–Pb ages ranging from Late Jurassic to Mesoproterozoic (Fig. 6B). The elevated oxygen isotope values in these older zircon grains also indicate that mixtures of older reworked materials with new (younger) mantle-derived material and the primordial continental crust from which they are sourced must be even older than is suggested by the calculation (e.g., > 1.1 Ga). Although the oldest, ca. 1.37 Ga, inherited zircon does not have a corresponding δ18O measurement, the TDM age of 1.5 Ga is consistent with the average age of subcontinental lithospheric mantle in the Deseado Massif and supports the idea of lower crustal formation at this time.
Tectonic framework considerations
The isotope data of zircon presented here for the EQC and WCA are consistent with those of other formations in the CASP (Fig. 14). The broad consistency in both felsic and intermediate volcanic rocks (e.g., Lonco Trapial Formation) with a crustal isotopic signature supports a common petrogenesis for the CASP, as proposed before (e.g., Pankhurst and Rapela 1995; Pankhurst et al. 1998; Riley et al. 2001). We suggest that the main differences in isotope values through space and time likely reflect changes in contributing basement crustal source between the North Patagonia Massif, Deseado Massif, Andean region, and the Antarctic Peninsula (Fig. 1).
Since volcanism associated with magmas generated via crustal anatexis is considered rare (e.g., Moyen et al. 2021), largely due to the thermal constraints of crustal anatexis and/or processes of assimilation (e.g., Glazner 2007; Heinonen et al. 2021), the CASP requires an overlap of exceptional circumstances necessary to drive felsic volcanism of this scale and through time. Both the EQC and WCA felsic magmas were generated within the region of southern Patagonia dominated by felsic metasedimentary lithologies deposited in a paleo-arc environment (e.g., turbidite and shallow marine units; Fig. 15). Although we cannot completely rule out a contribution from additional crustal sources, the consistencies in Hf isotopic compositions of detrital zircon grains analyzed from the Bahía de la Lancha Formation and additional units within the Eastern Andean Metamorphic Complex, together with similar detrital age components (Augustsson et al. 2006; Suárez et al. 2019b) as those inherited zircon cores measured here, support the source for the EQC to be derived from partial melting of this metasedimentary lithology.
In comparison, exposures in the eastern Deseado Massif comprise an older Proterozoic crystalline basement. Due to extensive burial, largely from the Jurassic volcanic rocks and Mesozoic basalt flows, the nature of the connection between the igneous-metamorphic basement outcrops in the eastern Deseado Massif and the metasedimentary La Modesta Formation is not exposed. Therefore, we illustrate this boundary as a depositional contact (Fig. 15) that was later accreted to the crystalline basement during the Mid- to Late Paleozoic (e.g., Moreira et al. 2005, 2013). A contribution from this older Proterozoic basement could aid in explaining the geochemical and isotope variability exhibited in the CA zircon values. However, zircon trace element values in the WCA are similar to the EQC and are more consistent with an origin from sedimentary protoliths derived from a LIL-depleted upper continental crust source (Figs. 8 and 9).
CASP magmatism largely occurred during an extensional period that resulted in widespread crustal melting within a high heat flux environment (Pankhurst et al. 2000; Riley et al. 2001; Falco et al. 2022; Foley et al. 2023). The temporal and spatial overlap with the continental Karoo and Ferrar mafic large igneous provinces (ca. 182–183 Ma; Burgess et al. 2015; Greber et al. 2020; Muedi et al. 2022) led some authors to suggest that crustal melting occurred in response to extensive basaltic underplating, sourced from a nearby plume (e.g., Storey and Kyle 1997; Pankhurst et al. 2000; Storey et al. 2013). However, a significant mass input is not supported by radiogenic data (Fig. 14) from the temporally overlapping CASP formations in the North Patagonian Massif and in the eastern Deseado Massif (e.g., Pankhurst and Rapela 1995; Strazzere et al. 2021; Falco et al. 2022). Furthermore, recent modeling restricts the thermal influence of the mantle plume to a diameter of ca. 2000 km (e.g., Lovecchio et al. 2020), indicating that a plume model cannot account for the widespread felsic magmatism along the southwest Gondwanan margin (Fig. 15).
The southwest Gondwanan margin (Fig. 15) was likely pulled apart by plate boundary processes operating on either side of the supercontinent (Storey et al. 1992; Storey and Kyle 1997; Lovecchio et al. 2020 and references therein). Recent publications argue for the CASP magmatic flare-up(s) following differential rollback of the subducting oceanic plate that triggered continental dispersal during the Jurassic (e.g., Echaurren et al. 2017; Navarrete et al. 2019; Lovecchio et al. 2020; Bastias et al. 2021). Along the southern Andes, during the Late Jurassic, crustal extension formed both back-arc basins and rift zones adjacent to the evolving arc (e.g., Rocas Verdes Basin; Calderón et al. 2016; Muller et al. 2022).
The earliest evidence for active subduction in the Southern Patagonian Batholith is a gabbro dated at 157 ± 3 Ma (Hervé et al. 2007). However, geochemical and isotopic characteristics of the ca. 150 Ma granodiorites at latitudes parallel to the felsic volcanism of the EQC (49–50°S, Fig. 2) are consistent with their formation by crustal melting during regional extension (Hervé et al. 2007). Steepening of the subducted slab and trench-ward migration would have enhanced back-arc extension and lithospheric thinning (Echaurren et al. 2017). Preferential asthenospheric decompression melting due to lithospheric thinning increased the volume of the mantle input as underplated melts into the lower crust and provided the ideal conditions for widespread lower crustal anatexis.
Within this region of southern Patagonia, the juxtaposition of fertile, low-grade metasediments to the mantle from which mafic melts are extracted provide the necessary thermal environment for the widespread partial melting of the crust (Fig. 15). The pressure and temperature environment for the generation of the EQC and WCA felsic melts was identified by thermodynamic models for fluid-absent melting of the Bahía de la Lancha and La Modesta Formation graywacke lithologies at 900 °C and 5 kbar, which corresponds to a mid- to lower crustal depth of ca. 20 km within an extending crust (Foley et al. 2023). The absence of a garnet signature in the REE pattern restricts the depth of melting for both the EQC and WCA during the Late Jurassic, although the REE pattern in the La Josefina dome (Fig. 8) does indicate garnet in its crustal source during an earlier phase of volcanism in the western Deseado Massif at ca. 179 Ma.
Conclusions
We discussed a large set of new zircon-based data from the Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province that further highlights the significance of crustal anatexis for the formation of voluminous silicic magmas. Zircon from the EQC have 18O-enriched values (7–9.5 ‰) with correspondingly negative initial εHf (− 2.0 to − 8.0). Zircon from the WCA, in contrast, have less elevated δ18O values (6–7‰) and initial εHf values which trend toward increasing radiogenic Hf compositions (− 4.0 to + 1.5). Based on trace element concentrations in the La Josefina Dome, the oldest magmatism in the western Deseado Massif (ca. 179 Ma) likely resulted from crustal melting at a depth where garnet was stable, with the highest oxygen values (7–8‰) and initial εHf values of ca. − 3.0 measured in the WCA zircon. In comparison, the felsic volcanism at ca. 160 Ma is characterized by similarly elevated oxygen isotope values and a larger radiogenic Hf component. The EQC marks the final CASP magmatic flare-up at ca. 150 Ma along the eastern Andean Cordillera, following the differential rollback of the subducting oceanic plate toward the paleo-Pacific margin.
The isotope values are semi-linearly distributed between the endmember components of an enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle and metasedimentary basement lithologies. Both the WCA and EQC felsic magmas represent crustal-dominated systems that require on average 60 to 70%, respectively, of their melts to be derived from the partial melting of a metasedimentary basement. Our observations for the EQC and WCA are consistent with the generation of the felsic magmas primarily within lower crustal MASH zones, where a significant volumetric contribution derives directly from partial melting of the crust as the primary source of the CASP melts. Despite a limited outcropping of mafic rocks in Patagonia, δ18O–Hf mixing models suggest open-system mixing with enriched mantle-derived melts.
Given the high crustal proportions involved in magma genesis, the combined oxygen and hafnium isotope measurements within the CASP provide an indirect sampling of the crustal reservoirs throughout Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula. Additionally, most of the Hf TDM ages from inherited zircon indicate a Mesoproterozoic crust origin and have U–Pb dates reflecting the major Gondwanan orogenic cycles recorded in South America (e.g., Famatinian, Pampean, and Grenvillian; Hervé et al. 2003; Pankhurst et al. 2003; Ramos 2008). The oxygen isotope compositions of the inherited zircon cores are dominated by “supracrustal” elevated δ18O values, indicating that the periods of magmatism at the corresponding U–Pb date are dominated by geological processes which led to crustal reworking, as opposed to periods of crustal growth. Igneous zircon with high δ18O compositions are likewise documented along the western paleo-Gondwanan margin, including the Permian granitoids of Tierra del Fuego (e.g., Castillo et al. 2017) and the Permian–Triassic magmatic rocks of the Antarctic Peninsula (e.g., Bastias et al. 2019; Castillo et al. 2020). Sediments are the dominant reservoir of high δ18O material on Earth. The availability of sediments with high δ18O signatures and the subsequent magmatic recycling along the paleo-Pacific Gondwanan continental margin was significant for the generation of high δ18O magmas throughout the Paleozoic and Mesozoic.
Data availability
All data obtained during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary files.
References
Albarède F, Telouk P, Blichert-Toft J, Boyet M, Agranier A, Nelson B (2004) Precise and accurate isotopic measurements using multiple collector ICPMS. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:2725–2744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2003.11.024
Annen C, Sparks RSJ (2002) Effects of repetitive emplacement of basaltic intrusions on thermal evolution and melt generation in the crust. Earth Planet Sci Lett 203:93–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00929-9
Annen C, Blundy JD, Sparks RSJ (2006) The genesis of intermediate and silicic magmas in deep crustal hot zones. J Petrol 47:505–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egi084
Augustsson C, Bahlburg H (2003) Active or passive continental margin? Geochemical and Nd isotope constraints of metasediments in the backstop of a pre-Andean accretionary wedge in southernmost chile (46°30′-48°30′S). Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 208:253–268. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.208.01.12
Augustsson C, Münker C, Bahlburg H, Fanning M (2006) Provenance of late palaeozoic metasediments of the SW South American Gondwana margin: a combined U-Pb and Hf-isotope study of single detrital zircons. J Geol Soc 163:983–995. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492005-149
Bastias J, Spikings R, Ulianov A, Riley T, Burton-Johnson A, Chiaradia M, Baumgartner B, Hervé F, Bouvier A-S (2019) The Gondwanan margin in West Antarctica: insights from late triassic magmatism of the Antarctic Peninsula. Gondwana Res 81:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2019.10.018
Bastias J, Spikings R, Riley T, Ulyanov A, Grunow A, Chiaradia M, Hervé F (2021) A revised interpretations of the Chon Aike magmatic province: active margin origin and implications for the opening of the weddell sea. Lithos 386–387:106013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106013
Bergantz GW (1989) Underplating and partial melting: implications for melt generation and extraction. Science 245:1093–1095. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4922.1093
Bindeman IN (2008) Oxygen isotopes in mantle and crustal magmas as revealed by single crystal analysis. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:445–478. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2008.69.12
Bindeman IN, Melnik OE (2016) Zircon survival, rebirth and recycling during crustal melting, magma crystallization, and mixing based on numerical modeling. J Petrol 57:437–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egw013
Bindeman IN, Ponomareva VV, Bailey JC, Valley JW (2004) Volcanic arc of Kamchatka: a province with high-δ18O magma sources and large-scale 18O/16O depletion of the upper crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:841–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.009
Bindeman IN, Eiler JM, Yogodzinski GM, Tatsumi Y, Stern CR, Grove TL, Portnyagin M, Hoernle K, Danyushevsky LV (2005) Oxygen isotope evidence for slab melting in modern and ancient subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 235:480–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.014
Bindeman IN, Watts KE, Schmitt AK, Morgan LA, Shanks PWC (2007) Voluminous low δ18O magmas in the late miocene heise volcanic field, Idaho: implications for the fate of yellowstone hotspot calderas. Geology 35:1019–1022. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24141A.1
Bouhier VE, Franchini MB, Caffe PJ, Maydagán L, Rapela CW, Paolini M (2017) Petrogenesis of volcanic rocks that host the world-class Ag-Pb Navidad District, North Patagonian Massif: comparison with the jurassic chon aike volcanic province of Patagonia, Argentina. J Volcanol Geoth Res 338:101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.03.016
Bouvier A, Vervoort JD, Patchett PJ (2008) The Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.06.010
Burgess SD, Bowring SA, Fleming TH, Elliot DH (2015) High precision geochronology links the ferrar large igneous province with early-Jurassic ocean anoxia and biotic crisis. Earth Planet Sci Lett 415:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.037
Calderón M, Fildani A, Hervé F, Fanning CM, Weislogel A, Cordani U (2007) Late jurassic bimodal magmatism in the northern sea-floor remnant of the rocas verdes basin, southern Patagonian Andes. J Geol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492006-102
Calderón M, Hervé F, Fuentes F, Fosdick JC, Sepúlveda F, Galaz G (2016) Tectonic evolution of paleozoic and mesozoic andean metamorphic complexes and the rocas verdes ophiolites in Southern Patagonia. In: geodynamic evolution of the southernmost andes, 7–36
Calderón M, Hervé F, Munizaga F, Pankhurst RJ, Fanning CM, Rapela C (2020) Geochronological record of plutonic activity on a long-lived active continental margin, with emphasis on the pre-andean rocks of Chile. In: Bartorelli A, Teixeira W, Brito Neves BB (eds) Geocronologia e Evolução Tectônica do Continente Sul-Americano: a contribuição de Umberto Giuseppe Cordani. Solaris Edições Culturais, São Paulo, pp 392–407
Carley TL, Miller CF, Wooden JL, Padilla AJ, Schmitt AK, Economos RC, Bindeman IN, Jordan BT (2014) Iceland is not a magmatic analog for the hadean: evidence from the zircon record. Earth Planet Sci Lett 405:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.015
Castillo P, Fanning CM, Pankhurst RJ, Hervé F, Rapela CW (2017) Zircon O- and Hf-isotope constraints on the genesis and tectonic significance of permian magmatism in Patagonia. J Geol Soc 174:803–816. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-152
Castillo P, Fanning CM, Riley TR (2020) Zircon O and Hf isotopic constraints on the genesis of permian-triassic magmatic and metamorphic rocks in the antarctic peninsula and correlations with Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci 104:102848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102848
Cavosie AJ, Valley JW, Kita NT, Spicuzza MJ, Ushikubo T, Wilde SA (2011) The origin of high δ18O zircons: marbles, megacrysts, and metamorphism. Contrib Mineral Petrol 162:961–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-011-0634-3
Cornet J, Laurent O, Wotzlaw J-F, Antonelli MA, Otamendi J, Bergantz GW, Bachmann O (2022) Reworking subducted sediments in arc magmas and the isotopic diversity of the continental crust: the case of the ordovician famatinian crustal section. Argent Earth Planet Sci Lett 595:117706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117706
Cúneo R, Ramezani J, Scasso R, Pol D, Escapa I, Zavattieri AM, Bowring SA (2013) High-precision U– Pb geochronology and a new chronostratigraphy for the Cañadón Asfalto Basin, chubut, central Patagonia: implications for terrestrial faunal and floral evolution in jurassic. Gondwana Res 24:1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.01.010
D’Abzac F-X, Czaja AD, Beard B, Schauer JJ, Johnson CM (2014) Iron distribution in size-resolved aerosols generated by UV-Femtosecond laser ablation: influence of cell geometry and implications for in situ isotopic determination by LA-MC-ICP-MS. Geostand Geoanal Res 38:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2014.00281.x
Dallai L, Bianchini G, Avanzinelli R, Natali C, Conticelli S (2019) Heavy oxygen recycled into the lithospheric mantle. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45031-3
De La Cruz R, Suárez M (2006) Geología del Área Puerto Guadal-Puerto Sánchez. Región Aisén del General Carlos Ibañez del Campo, escala, 1(100,000)
Dejonghe A, Darras B, Hughes G, Muchez P, Scoates J, Weis D (2002) Isotopic and fluid-inclusion constraints on the formation of polymetallic vein deposits in the central Argentinian Patagonia. Mineralum Deposita 37(2):158–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-001-0225-8
DePaolo DJ, Linn AM, Schubert G (1991) The continental crust age distribution: methods of determining mantle separation ages from Sm-Nd isotopic data and application to the Southwestern United States. J Geophys Res 96:2071–2088. https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02219
Dhuime B, Hawkesworth CJ, Cawood PA, Storey CD (2012) A change in the geodynamics of continental growth 3 billion years ago. Science 335:1334–1336. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216066
Dube B, Zubia MA, Dunning G, Villeneuve M (2003) Estudio geocronológico de los campos filonianos de baja sulfuración hospedados en la Formación Chon Aike en el Macizo del Deseado, provincial de Santa Cruz. In: Zubia M, Genini A (eds) Yacimientos auroargeníferos epitermales del Macizo del Deseado. SEGEMAR Serie Contribuciones Técnicas Recursos Minerales, Provincia de Santa Cruz, pp 17–24
Dufek J, Bergantz GW (2005) Lower Crustal magma genesis and preservation: a stochastic framework for the evaluation of basalt-crust interaction. J Petrol 46:2167–2195. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egi049
Echaurren A, Oliverson V, Folguera A, Ibarra F, Creixell C, Lucassen F (2017) Early Andean tectonomagmatic stages in north Patagonia: insights from field and geochemical data. J Geol Soc 174:405–421. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-087
Eiler JM (2001) Oxygen isotope variations of basaltic lavas and upper mantle rocks. Rev Mineral Geochem 43:319–364. https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.319
Ernst R (2014) Silicic LIPs. Large igneous provinces. University Press, Cambridge, pp 214–244
Ernst RE, Bond, DPG, Zhang S-H, Buchan KL, Grasby SE, Youbi N, El Bilali H, Bekker A, Doucet LS (2021) Large igneous province record through time and implications for secular environmental changes and geological time-scale boundaries. In: Geophysical monograph series, large igneous provinces: a driver of global environmental and biotic changes, pp 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch1
Ewing TA, Müntener O, Leuthold J, Ramírez de Arellano C, Baumgartner LP, Schaltegger U (2018) The zircon Hf isotope archive of rapidly changing mantle sources in the south Patagonian retro-arc. Bull Geol Soc Am 131:58–608. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31983.1
Falco JI, Hauser N, Scivetti N, Riemold WU, Schmitt RT, Folguera A (2022) Upper Triassic to Middle Jurassic magmatic evolution of northern Patagonia: insights from the tectonic and crustal evolution of the Los Menucos area, North Patagonian Massif, Argentina. J S Am Earth Sci 113:103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103631
Ferry JM, Watson EB (2007) New thermodynamic models and revised calibrations for the Ti-in-zircon and Zr-in-rutile thermometers. Contrib Mineral Petrol 154:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-007-0201-0
Fisher CM, Hanchar JM, Samson SD, Dhuime B, Blichert-Toft J, Vervoort JD, Lam R (2011) Synthetic zircon doped with hafnium and rare earth elements: a reference material for in situ hafnium isotope analysis. Chem Geol 286:32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.04.013
Foley ML, Guillermin Z, Putlitz B, Baumgartner LP (2022) Zircon U-Pb ages in El Chaltén Jurassic rhyolites (Chon Aike Silicic LIP, Argentina) reveal xenocrystic remnants of an unexposed lower basement of the Paleo-Pacific Gondwana margin. J South Am Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103690
Foley ML, Putlitz B, Baumgartner LP, Bégué F, Siron G, Kosmal A (2023) Generating large volumes of crust-derived high δ18O rhyolites in the Chon Aike Silicic large igneous province, Patagonia. Geosphere. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02551.1
Franzese JR, Veiga GD, Schwarz E, Gómez-Pérez I (2006) Tectonostratigraphic evolution of a Mesozoic graben border system: the chachil depocentre, southern Neuquén Basin, Argentina. J Geol Soc 163:707–721. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764920-082
Forsythe R (1982) The late Palaeozoic to early Mesozoic evolution of southern South America: a plate tectonic interpretation. J Geol Soc 139:671–682. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.139.6.0671
Gain SEM, Gréau Y, Henry H, Belousova E, Dainis I, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (2019) Mud tank zircon: long-term evaluation of a reference material for U-Pb Dating, Hf-isotope analysis and trace element analysis. Geostand Geoanal Res 43:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12265
Gaynor SP, Smith TM, Schaltegger U (2023) Tracing magmatic genesis and evolution through single zircon crystals from successive supereruptions from the Socorro Caldera Complex, USA. Earth Planet Sci Lett 616:118236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118236
Gerdes A, Zeh A (2006) Combined U-Pb and Hf isotope LA-(MC-) ICP-MS analyses of detrital zircons: comparison with SHRIMP and new constraints for the provenance and age of an Armorican metasediment in Central Germany. Earth Planetary Science Letters 249:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.039
Gianni GM, Navarrete CR (2022) Catastrophic slab loss in southwestern pangea preserved in the mantle and igneous record. Nat Commun 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28290-z
Glazner AF (2007) Thermal limitations on incorporation of wall rock into magma. Geology 35:319–322. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23134A.1
González-Maurel O, Deegan FM, Le Roux P, Harris C, Troll VR, Godoy B (2020) Constraining the sub-arc, parental magma composition for the giant Altiplano-Puna Volcanic complex, northern Chile. Sci Rep 10:6864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63454-1
Goodge JW, Vervoort JD (2006) Origin of mesoproterozoic A-type granites in laurentia: Hf isotope evidence. Earth Planet Sci Lett 243:711–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.040
González PD, Sato AM, Naipauer M, Varela R, Basei M, Sato K, Llambías EJ, Chemale F, Dorado AC (2018) Patagonia-Antarctica early paleozoic conjugate margins: cambrian synsedimentary silicic magmatism, U-Pb dating of K-bentonites, and related volcanogenic rocks. Gondwana Res 63:186–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.05.015
Greber ND, Davies JHFL, Gaynor SP, Jourdan F, Bertrand H, Schaltegger U (2020) New high precision U-Pb ages and Hf isotope data from the Karoo large igneous province; implications for pulsed magmatism and early Toarcian environmental perturbations. Result Geochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ringeo.2020.100005
Grimes CB, Wooden JL, Cheadle MJ, John BE (2015) “Fingerprinting” tectono-magmatic provenance using trace elements in igneous zircon. Contrib Mineral Petrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1199-3
Guido DM (2004) Subdivisión litofacial e interpretación del volcanismo jurásico (Grupo Bahía Laura) en el este del Macizo del Deseado, provincia de Santa Cruz. Revista De La Asociación Geológica Argentina 59:727–742
Guido DM, Escayola MP, Schalamuk IB (2004) The basement of the Deseado Massif at Bahia Laura, Patagonia, Argentina: a proposal for its evolution. J S Am Earth Sci 16:567–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2003.10.003
Gust DA, Biddle KT, Phelps DW, Uliana MA (1985) Associated Middle to Late Jurassic Volcanism and extension in Southern South America. Tectonophysics 116:223–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90210-0
Hanchar JM, Van Westrenen W (2007) Rare earth element behavior in zircon-melt systems. Elements 3:37–42. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.1.37
Hauser N, Cabaleri NG, Gallego OF, Monferran MD, Silva Nieto D, Armella C, Matteini M, Aparicio González PA, Pimentel MM, Volkheimer W, Riemold WU (2017) U-Pb and Lu-Hf geochronology of the Cañadón Asfalto Basin, Chubut, Argentina: implications for the magmatic evolution in central Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci 78:190–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.05.001
Hawkesworth CJ, Kemp AIS (2006) Using hafnium and oxygen isotopes in zircons to unravel the record of crustal evolution. Chem Geol 226:144–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.09.018
Heinonen JS, Spera FJ, Bohrson WA (2021) Thermodynamic limits for assimilation of silicate crust in primitive magmas. Geology 50:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1130/G49139.1
Hervé F, Fanning CM, Pankhurst RJ (2003) Detrital Zircon Age patterns and provenance in the metamorphic complexes of Southern Chile. J S Am Earth Sci 16:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-9811(03)00022-1
Hervé F, Pankhurst RJ, Fanning CM, Calderón M, Yaxley GM (2007) The South Patagonian batholith: 150 my of granite magmatism on a plate margin. Lithos 97:373–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.01.007
Hildreth W, Moorbath S (1988) Crustal contributions to arc magmatism in the Andes of central Chile. Contrib Miner Petrol 98:455–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372365
Horn I, Rudnick RL, McDonough WF (2000) Precise elemental and isotope ratio determination by simultaneous solution nebulization and laser ablation-ICP-MS: application to U-Pb geochronology. Chem Geol 164:281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00168-0
Jackson SE (2008) Lamtrace data reduction software for LA-ICP-MS. In: Sylvester P (ed) Laser ablation ICP-MS in the earth sciences current practices and outstanding issues. Short Course Series Mineralogical Association of canada, Vancouver, pp 305–307
Kemp AIS, Hawkesworth CJ, Foster GL, Paterson BA, Woodhead JD, Hergt JM, Gray CM, Whitehouse MJ (2007) Magmatic and crustal differentiation history of granitic rocks from Hf-O isotopes in zircon. Science 315:980–983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136154
Kirkland CL, Smithies RH, Taylor RJM, Evans N, McDonald B (2015) Zircon Th/U ratios in magmatic environs. Lithos 212–215:397–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2014.11.021
Kita NT, Ushikubo T, Fu B, Valley JW (2009) High precision SIMS oxygen isotope analysis and the effect of sample topography. Chem Geol 264:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.02.012
Li XH, Long WG, Li QL, Liu Y, Zheng YF, Yang YH, Chamberlain KR, Wan DF, Guo CH, Wang XC, Tao H (2010) Penglai zircon megacrysts: a potential new working reference material for microbeam determination of Hf-O isotopes and U-Pb age. Geostand Geoanal Res 34:117–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2010.00036.x
Lopez RG (2006) Estudio Geológico-Metalogenético del área oriental al curso medio del Rió Pinturas, sector noroeste del Macizo del Deseado, Provincial de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de La Plata 206
Lovecchio JP, Rohais S, Joseph P, Bolatti ND, Ramos VA (2020) Mesozoic rifting evolution of SW Gondwana: a poly-phase, subduction-related, extensional history responsible for basin formation along the Argentinean Atlantic margin. Earth Sci Rev 203:103138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103138
Malkowski MA, Grove M, Graham SA (2016) Unzipping the Patagonian Andes-Long-lived influence of rifting history on foreland basin evolution. Lithosphere 8:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1130/L489.1
Mattey D, Lowry D, Macpherson C (1994) Oxygen isotope composition of mantle peridotite. Earth Planet Sci Lett 128:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(94)90147-3
Matthews SJ, Atampiz M, Omar JR, Valencia V, Pérez de Arce C, Bustos A, Llona F, Rodríguez ME, Munizaga W, di Caro J, Gonzalez J, Cingolani CA (2021) Lower to Middle Jurassic volcanism and Au-Ag mineralization at Cerro Moro District, Deseado Massif, Argentine Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci 112:103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103622
Miller CF, McDowell SM, Mapes RW (2003) Hot and cold granites? Implications of zircon saturation temperatures and preservation of inheritance. Geology 31:529–532. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031%3c0529:HACGIO%3e2.0.CO;2
Miller JS, Matzel JEP, Miller CF, Burgess SD, Miller RB (2007) Zircon growth and recycling during the assembly of large, composite arc plutons. J Volcanol Geoth Res 167:282–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.04.019
Moreira P, González P, Fernández R, Echeveste H, Schalamuk I, Etcheverry R (2005) El basamento de bajo grado de las Estancias La Modesta y La Josefina, Macizo del Deseado, Provincia de Santa Cruz. Revista De La Asociación Geológica Argentina 60(1):49e63
Moreira P, Echeveste H, Fernández R, Hartmann LA, Santos JOS, Schalamuk I (2009) Dispositional age of Jurassic epithermal gold-silver ore in the Deseado Massif, Patagonia, Argentina, based on Manantial Espejo and La Josefina prospects. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 253:25–40
Moreira P, Fernández R, Hervé F, Fanning CM, Schalamuk IA (2013) Detrital zircons U-Pb SHRIMP ages and provenance of La Modesta formation, Patagonia Argentina. J South Am Earth Sci 47:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2013.05.010
Morel MLA, Nebel O, Nebel-Jacobsen YJ, Miller JS, Vroon PZ (2008) Hafnium isotope characterization of the GJ-1 zircon reference material by solution and laser-ablation MC-ICPMS. Chem Geol 225:231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.06.040
Moyen J-F, Janoušek V, Laurent O, Bachmann O, Jacob J-B, Farina F, Fiannazza P, Villaros A (2021) Crustal melting vs fractionation of basaltic magmas: part 1, granites and paradigms. Lithos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291
Muedi T, MacLennan S, Szymanowski D, Schoene B, Ramezani J, Oalmann J, Linol B (2022) Constraining the timescales of mafic magmatism of the Central Karoo large igneous province using high precision U-Pb zircon geochronology. South Afr J Geol 125:99–112. https://doi.org/10.25131/sajg.125.0009
Muller VAP, Calderón M, Fosdick JC, Ghiglone MC, Cury LF, Massonne H-J, Fanning CM, Warren CJ, Ramírez de Arellano C, Sternai P (2021) The closure of the Rocas Verdes Basin and early tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Magallanes fold-and-thrust belt, southern Patagonian Andes (52–54°S). Tectonophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228686
Mundl A, Ntaflos T, Ackerman L, Bizimis M, Bjerg EA, Hauzenberger CA (2015) Mesoproterozoic and Paleoproterozoic subcontinental lithospheric mantle domains beneath southern Patagonia: Isotopic evidence for its connection to Africa and Antarctica. Geology 43:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36344.1
Müntener O, Ewing T, Baumgartner LP, Manzini M, Roux T, Pellaud P, Allemann L (2018) Source and fractionation controls on subduction-related plutons and dike swarms in southern Patagonia (Torres del Paine area) and the low Nb/Ta of upper crustal igneous rocks. Contrib Mineral Petrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-018-1467-0
Navarrete C, Gianni G, Encinas A, Márquez M, Kamerbeek Y, Valle M, Folguera A (2019) Triassic to Middle Jurassic geodynamic evolution of southwestern Gondwana: From a large flat-slab to mantle plume suction in a rollback subduction setting. Earth Sci Rev 194:125–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.05.002
Navarrete C, Butler KL, Hurley M, Márquez M (2020) An early Jurassic graben caldera of Chon Aike silicic LIP at the southernmost massif of the world: the Deseado caldera, Patagonia, Argentina. J S Am Earth Sci 101:102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102626
Oriolo S, González PD, Renda EM, Basei MAS, Otamendi J, Cordenons P, Marcos P, Yoyo MB, Ballivián Justiniano CA, Suárez R (2023) Linking accretionary orogens with continental crustal growth and stabilization: lessons from Patagonia. Gondwana Res 121:368–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.011
Pankhurst RJ, Rapela CR (1995) Production of Jurassic rhyolite by anatexis of the lower crust of Patagonia. Earth Planet Sci Lett 134:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(95)00103-J
Pankhurst RJ, Leat PT, Sruoga P, Rapela CW, Márquez M, Storey BC, Riley TR (1998) The Chon Aike silicic igneous province of Patagonia and related rocks in Antarctica: a silicic large igneous province. J Volcanol Geoth Res 81:113–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(97)00070-X
Pankhurst RJ, Weaver SD, Hervé F, Larrondo P (1999) Mesozoic-Cenozoic evolution of the North Patagonian Batholith in Aysen, southern Chile. J Geol Soc 156:673–694. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.156.4.0673
Pankhurst RJ, Riley TR, Fanning CM, Kelley SP (2000) Episodic silicic volcanism in Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula: chronology of magmatism associated with the break- up of Gondwana. J Petrol 41:603–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/41.5.605
Pankhurst RJ, Rapela CW, Loske WP, Márquez M, Fanning CM (2003) Chronological study of the pre-Permian basement rocks of southern Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci 16:27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-9811(03)00017-8
Pankhurst RJ, Rapela CW, Fanning CM, Márquez M (2006) Gondwanide continental collision and the origin of Patagonia. Earth Sci Rev 76:235–257
Parada MA, Palacios C, Lahsen A (1997) Jurassic extensional tectono-magmatism and associated mineralization of the El Faldeo polymetallic district, Chilean Patagonia: geochemical and isotopic evidence of crustal contribution. Miner Deposita 32:547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001260050121
Patchett J, Tatsumoto M (1981) A routine high-precision method for Lu–Hf isotope geo- chemistry and chronology. Contrib Mineral Petrol 75:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01166766
Pavón-Pivetta C, Gregori D, Benedini L, Garrido M, Strazzere L, Geraldes M, Costa dos Santos A, Marcos P (2020) Contrasting tectonic settings in Northern Chon Aike Igneous Province of Patagonia: subduction and mantle plume-related volcanism in the Marifil formation. Int Geol Rev 62:1904–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2019.1669227
Permuy-Vidal C, Moreira P, Guido DM, Fanning CM (2014) Linkages between the southern Patagonia Pre-Permian basements: new insights from detrital zircons U-Pb SHRIMP ages from the Cerro Negro District. Geol Acta 12:137–150
Permuy-Vidal C, Guido DM, Shatwell D, Lopez SM, Páez GN, Moreira P (2021) The Cerro Negro epithermal district, northwestern Deseado Massif (Patagonia, Argentina): new insights from telescoped volcanic-hydrothermal systems. J S Am Earth Sci 105:103017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.103017
Poblete JA, Bissig T, Mortensen JK, Gabites J, Friedman R, Rodriguez M (2013) The Cerro Bayo District, Chilean Patagonia: late Jurassic to Cretaceous Magmatism and protracted history of epithermal Ag-Au mineralization. Econ Geol 109:487–502. https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.109.2.487
Ramos VA (1988) Tectonics of the late Proterozoic-early Paleozoic: a collisional history of southern South America. Episodes 11:168–174. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/1988/v11i3/003
Ramos VA (2008) Patagonia: a Paleozoic continent adrift? J S Am Earth Sci 26:235–251
Ramos VA, Naipauer M (2014) Patagonia: where does it come from? J Iber Geol 40:367–379
Rapela CW, Pankhurst RJ (1996) Monzonite suites: the innermost Cordilleran plutonism of Patagonia. Trans Royal Soc Edinb: Earth Sci 87:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2315-9.193
Riccardi A (1971) Estratigrafía en el oriente de la Bahía de la Lancha, Lago San Martín, Santa Cruz, Argentina. Revista Museo De La Plata, Nueva Serie 61:245–318
Riley TR, Leat PT (1999) Large volume silicic volcanism along the proto-Pacific margin of Gondwana: lithological and stratigraphical investigations from the Antarctic Peninsula. Geol Mag 136:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756899002265
Riley TR, Leat PT, Pankhurst RJ, Harris C (2001) Origins of Large Volume Rhyolitic Volcanism in the Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia by crustal melting. J Petrol 42:1043–1065. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/42.6.1043
Riley TR, Flowerdew MJ, Pankhurst RJ, Curtis ML, Millar IL, Fanning CM, Whitehouse MJ (2017) Early Jurassic magmatism on the Antarctic Peninsula and potential correlation with the Subcordilleran plutonic belt of Patagonia. J Geol Soc 174:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-053
Rolando AP, Hartman LA, Santos JO, Fernandez RR, Etcheverry RO, Schalamuk IA, McNaughton NJ (2004) SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dates from igneous rocks from the Fontana Lake region, Patagonia: Implications for the age of magmatism, Mesozoic geological evolution and age of basement. Revista De La Asociación Geológica Argentina 59:671–684
Ruiz M, Schaltegger U, Gaynor SP, Chiaradia M, Abrecht J, Gisler C, Giovanoli F, Wiederkehr M (2022) Reassessing the intrusive tempo and magma genesis of the late Variscan Aar batholith: U-Pb geochronology, trace element and initial Hf isotope composition of zircon. Swiss J Geosci 115:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-022-00420-1
Scasso RA, Ramenzani J, Escapa I, Elgorriaga A, Capelli I (2022) U-Pb age constraints on the Jurassic succession and paleoflora of Mount Flora, Antarctic Peninsula. Int J Earth Sci 111:891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-02155-0
Schaltegger U, Ovtcharova M, Gaynor SP, Schoene B, Wotzlaw JF, Davies JFHL, Farina F, Greber ND, Szymanowski D, Chelle-Michou C (2021) Long-term repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility of high-precision ID-TIMS U-Pb geochronology. J Anal at Spectrom 36:1466–1477. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1JA00116G
Schilling ME, Carlson RW, Tassara A, Conceição RV, Bertotto GW, Vàsquez M, Muñiz D, Jalowitzki T, Gervasoni F, Morata D (2017) The origin of Patagonia revealed by Re-Os systematics of mantle xenoliths. Precambr Res 294:15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.03.008
Seitz S, Putlitz B, Baumgartner LP, Bouvier A-S (2018) The role of crustal melting in the formation of rhyolites: constraints from SIMS oxygen isotope data (Chon Aike Province, Patagonia, Argentina). Am Miner 103:2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2018-6520
Sláma J, Košler J, Condon DJ, Crowley JL, Gerdes A, Hanchar JM, Horstwood MSA, Morris GA, Nasdala L, Norberg N, Schaltegger U, Schoene B, Tubrett MN, Whitehouse MJ (2008) Plešovice zircon—a new natural reference material for U–Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chem Geol 249:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.11.005
Söderlund U, Patchett J, Vervoort J, Isachsen C (2004) The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu–Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 219:311–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3
Stelten ME, Cooper KM, Vazquez JA, Reid MR, Barfod GH, Wimpenny J, Yin Q (2013) Magma mixing and the generation of isotopically juvenile silicic magma at Yellowstone caldera inferred from coupling 238U–230Th ages with trace elements and Hf and O isotopes in zircon and Pb isotopes in sanidine. Contrib Mineral Petrol 166:587–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-013-0893-2
Storey BC, Alabaster T (1991) Tectonomagmatic controls on Gondwana break-up models: evidence from the proto-Pacific margin of Antarctica. Tectonics 10:1274–1288
Storey BC, Kyle PR (1997) An active mantle mechanism for Gondwana breakup. S Afr J Geol 100:283–290
Storey BC, Alabaster T, Hole MJ, Pankhurst RJ, Wever HE (1992) Role of subduction plate boundary forces during the initial stages of Gondwana break-up: evidence from the proto-Pacific margin of Antarctica. In: Storey BC, Alabaster T, Pankhurst RJ (eds) Magmatism and the causes of continental break-up. Special Publication of the Geological Society, London, pp 149–163
Storey B, Vaughan A, Riley T (2013) The links between large igneous provinces, continental break-up and environmental change: evidence reviewed from Antarctica. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinb 104:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569101300011X
Strazzere L, Gregori D, Benedini L, Marcos P, Barros M, Geraldes M, Pavón-Pivetta C (2018) The puesto piris formation: evidence of basin-development in the North Patagonian Massif during crustal extension associated with Gondwana breakup. Geosci Front 10:299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.12.019
Strazzere L, Pavón-Pivetta C, Gregori DA, Benedini L, Geraldes MC, Barros MV (2021) The Marifil Volcanic complex at Sierra de Pailemán: implications for the early Jurassic magmatic evolution of the Eastern North Patagonian region. Int Geol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2021.1884996
Suárez R, González PD, Ghiglione MC (2019a) A review on the tectonic evolution of the Paleozoic-Triassic basins from Patagonia: record of protracted westward migration of the pre-Jurassic subduction zone. J S Am Earth Sci 95:102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102256
Suárez R, Ghiglione MC, Calderón M, Sue C, Martinod J, Guillaume B, Rojo D (2019b) The metamorphic rocks of the Nunatak Viedma in the Southern Patagonian Andes: provenance source and implications for the early Mesozoic Patagonia-Antarctic Peninsula connection. J S Am Earth Sci 90:471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.12.015
Taylor HP (1980) The effects of assimilation of country rocks by magmas on 18O/16O and 87Sr/88Sr systematics in igneous rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 47:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(80)90040-0
Taylor HP, Sheppard SMF (1986) Igneous rocks; I, processes of isotopic fractionation and isotope systematics. Rev Mineral Geochem 16:227–271. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501508936-013
Thirlwall MF, Anczkiewicz R (2004) Multidynamic isotope ratio analysis using MC-ICP- MS and the causes of secular drift in Hf, Nd and Pb isotope ratios. Int J Mass Spectrom 235:59–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2004.04.002
Ulianov A, Müntener O, Schaltegger U, Bussy F (2012) The data treatment dependent variability of U-Pb zircon ages obtained using mono-collector, sector field, laser ablation ICPMS. J Anal at Spectrom 27:663–676. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JA10358C
Valley JW (2003) Oxygen isotopes in zircon. Rev Mineral Geochem 53:343–385. https://doi.org/10.2113/0530343
Valley JW, Kinny PD, Schulze DJ, Spicuzza MJ (1998) Zircon megacrysts from kimberlite: oxygen isotope variability among mantle melts. Contrib Mineral Petrol 133:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004100050432
Valley JW, Lackey JS, Cavosie AJ, Clechenke CC, Spicuzza MJ, Basei MAS, Bindeman IN, Ferreira VP, Sial AN, King EM, Peck WH, Sinha AK, Wei CS (2005) 4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: oxygen isotope ratios of magmatic zircon. Contrib Miner Petrol 150:561–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-005-0025-8
Vermeesch P (2018) IsoplotR: a free and open toolbox for geochronology. Geosci Front 9:1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001
Vervoort JD, Kemp AIS (2016) Clarifying the zircon Hf isotope record of crust-mantle evolution. Chem Geol 425:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.023
Vervoort JD, Plank T, Prytulak J (2011) The Hf–Nd isotopic composition of marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:5903–5926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.046
Watson EB, Harrison TM (1983) Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types. Earth Planet Sci Lett 64:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90211-X
Watson EB, Harrison TM (2005) Zircon thermometer reveals minimum melting conditions on earliest Earth. Science 308:841–844. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110873
Widmann P, Davies JHFL, Schaltegger U (2019) Calibrating chemical abrasion: its effects on zircon crystal structure, chemical composition and U-Pb age. Chem Geol 511:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.02.02
Willbold M, Stracke A (2006) Trace element composition of mantle end-members: implications for recycling of oceanic and upper and lower continental crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 7:Q04004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001005
Woodhead JD, Hergt JM (2005) A preliminary appraisal of seven natural zircon reference materials for in situ Hf isotope determination. Geostand Geoanal Res 29:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2005.tb00891.x
Workman RK, Hart SR (2005) Major and trace element composition of the depleted MORB mantle (DMM). Earth Planet Sci Lett 231:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.12.005
Zaffarana CB, Lagorio SL, Gallastegui G, Wörner G, Orts DL, Gregori D, Poma S, Busteros A, Giacosa R, Nieto DS, González VR, Boltshauser B, Negre CP, Haller M (2020) Petrogenetic study of the Lonco Trapial volcanism and its comparison with the Early-Middle Jurassic magmatic units from northern Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci 101:102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102624
Zindler A, Hart S (1986) Chemical geodynamics. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 14:493–571. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.14.050186.002425
Zheng Y-F (1993) Calculation of oxygen isotope fractionation in anhydrous silicate minerals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90042-U
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support and field assistance of Andres Kosmal in El Chaltén (Argentina). They further thank the authorities of the Parque Nacional de los Glaciares (Argentina) for their permission to sample in the region of El Chaltén. They also thank Vincente Sánchez, the Head Geologist, and the staff of the La Josefina Project (Hunt Mining) for their generosity and openness to sharing geological knowledge and resources on site. They thank D.O. Zakharov for thoughtful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript. They also thank editor Dante Canil and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions which helped the clarity of this manuscript. This research is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_175808 to BP). The WiscSIMS instrumentation is partially supported by the National Science Foundation (EAR-1658823).
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Lausanne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Communicated by Dante Canil.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Foley, M.L., Putlitz, B., Baumgartner, L.P. et al. Identifying crustal contributions in the Patagonian Chon Aike Silicic Large Igneous Province. Contrib Mineral Petrol 178, 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-023-02065-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-023-02065-1