Skip to main content
Log in

History and Epistemology of Models: Meteorology (1946–1963) as a Case Study

  • Published:
Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An early example is von Neumann's and Charney's Princeton Meteorological Project in the period 1946–53 which ended with daily numerical prediction in less than 2 hours. After this stage, the questions of long-range forecasting and general circulation of the atmosphere became of greater importance. The late 1950s saw the emergence of an alternative: were atmospheric models used mainly for prediction or understanding? This controversial debate in particular occurred during an important colloquium in Tokyo in 1960 which gathered together J. Charney, E. Lorenz, A. Eliassen, and B. Saltzman, among others, and witnessed discussions on statistical methods for predictions and/or maximum simplification of dynamic equations. This phase ended in 1963 with Lorenzs seminal paper on “Deterministic non periodic flows.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

(Received February 11, 2000)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalmedico, A. History and Epistemology of Models: Meteorology (1946–1963) as a Case Study. Arch Hist Exact Sc. 55, 395–422 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070000032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070000032

Keywords

Navigation