Abstract
Françios Viète (1540–1603) was a geometer in search of better techniques for astronomical calculation. Through his theorem on angular sections he found a use for higher-dimensional geometric magnitudes which allowed him to create an algebra for geometry. We show that unlike traditional numerical algebra, the knowns and unknowns in Viète’s logistice speciosa are the relative sizes of non-arithmetized magnitudes in which the “calculations” must respect dimension. Along with this foundational shift Viète adopted a radically new notation based in Greek geometric equalities. His letters stand for values rather than types, and his given values are undetermined. Where previously algebra was founded in polynomials as aggregations, Viète became the first modern algebraist in working with polynomials built from operations, and the notations reflect these conceptions. Viète’s innovations are situated in the context of sixteenth-century practice, and we examine the interpretation of Jacob Klein, the only historian to have conducted a serious inquiry into the ontology of Viète’s “species”.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“à barbaris defædata & conspurcata” (Viète 1591, fol. 2b.-7; 1646, p. xi.14). Translation from (Klein 1968, p. 318). Note: folio/page numbers are followed by line number, separated by a full stop. The first reference in this footnote is in the seventh line from the bottom of folio 2b, and the second is in the 14th line from the top of page xi.
(Freguglia 2008a, p. 53) dates the composition to before 1593.
The first sixteen folios were printed in Tours in 1593, and the remainder in Paris in 1600. Folio 16 ends in the middle of Zetetic IV.6 (Van Egmond 1985, p. 362).
“...multiplicemus 1L in 20 P 1L, existent 20L P 1Q, ducamus 2L in 20 M 2L, fient 40L M 4Q” (Gosselin 1577, fol. 76a.13).
“Ut 9 in 27 facit 243” (Diophantus 1575, p. 3.19).
“Sic 8q per 4 faciunt 32q” (Ramus 1560, fol. 3a).
“...solidum basim habens quadratum ex FD, & altitudinem DE” (Pappus 1588, fol. 282a.4).
“...cubum AB, æqualem esse cubis AG & GB & triplo AG in quadratum GB, & triplo GB in quadratum AG” (Cardano 1545, fol 16b.7).
“...ergo totus ductus .a.g. in .b.d. est equalis ductui .a.b. in .g.d. & .a.d. in .b.g. simul.” (Ptolemy 1515, fol. 5b.-2).
In a quantity like \(2+\sqrt{3}\) the ‘names’ or ‘terms’ are the 2 and the \(\sqrt{3}\).
“Quando nomina quantitatum sunt ad invicem incommensurabilia: tunc congregatio haud aliter fieri potest, quàm aggregatis membris per adverbium Plus: nec etiam differentia aliter proferri, quàm per adverbium Minus: sicut ostendit Euclides in decimo, tam de binomijs, quàm de residuis.” (Maurolico 1575, p. 101.7). I italicize plus and minus because I am not translating them from Latin.
“ut si iungendæ sint duæ quantitates r. 3. & r. 2. statim dicá, earum aggregatum esse r. 3. p\(^{\circ }\) r. 2. Si vero hæc ab illa subtrahenda fit, ilicet respondebo, residuum post subtractionem esse r. 3. \({\tilde{\mathrm{m}}}\). r. 2.” (Maurolico 1575, p. 94.10).
“Si verò diversæ species addendæ sint inter se, vel subtrahendæ, quod accidit in hoc magisterio frequenter, tunc utimur duabis istis dictionibus, plus, & minus, quæ primoribus suis literis notantur, sic P, & M.” (Borrel 1559, p. 124.5).
“excessu AC DE” (Pappus 1588, fol. 180a.-2).
The Greek word was also sometimes translated more generally as quantitas. I am concerned specifically with the Latin magnitudo.
“Arithmetica est scientia, quæ uim & naturam numerorum tradit”, “Geometria est scientia magnitudinum” (Dasypodius 1573, fols. 1a, 7a).
“Magnitudo est quæ crescit & augetur, atque secatur, dividique potest in infinitum usque. sunt autem tres species, linea, superficies, corpus” (Dasypodius 1573, fol. 22a.2).
As Clavius does in (Euclid 1574, p. 14 of the Prolegomena).
Some sixteenth-century mathematicians who apply the word magnitudo in these ways include Gregor Reisch, Johann Scheubel, Oronce Fine, Jacques Peletier, Pedro Monzón, François de Foix Candale, Petrus Ramus, Federico Commandino, Christoph Clavius, and Guillaume Gosselin (Reisch 1504, 2nd page of Book VI; Euclid 1550, p. 226.16; 1551, fol. 1a; 1557, p. 2; 1566, fol. 39a; 1572, fols. 1a, 6b, 57b, 124a; 1574, pp. 2, 14 of the Prolegomena; Monzón 1559, fols. 39a, 40a; Ramus 1569, pp. 2–3 of Geometriae; Gosselin 1577, fol. 1aff).
Reisch and Commandino are two examples. See (Crapulli 1969, chapter I). Barocius’s 1560 translation of Proclus’s commentary on Book I of the Elements also restricts magnitudo to the three geometric dimensions (Proclus 1560, pp. 3, 21.4, 33.19, 34.4, 69.26), and in his investigation of the nature of angles he explains that they are not magnitudes (Proclus 1560, pp. 69ff).
Following the uses of arithmos in Diophantus, Xylander and Viète use the word numerus with still another meaning as the name the first-degree unknown in logistice numerosa. There, too, the meaning is clear by the context. See Sect. 4.1.
Translation adapted from (Klein 1968, p. 324).
(Apollonius 1566, fol. 86b.13). Points b, d, l, and x are colinear. I wrote the letters from the diagram in italics to distinguish them from the surrounding text. Taliafero translates Apollonius’s Greek using the symbols “+” and “=”: “rect. BX, XD + rect. BL, LD + sq. XE + sq. LE = 2 sq. BE”, and Heiberg’s version is even more algebraic: “\(B\varXi \times \varXi \varDelta +B\varLambda \times \varLambda \varDelta +\varXi E^2+\varLambda E^2=2BE^2\)” (Apollonius 2000, p. 221; 1891, p. 381.18).
(Viète 1595a, fol. 11b; 1646, p. 319). The vertical bar can be read as a kind of decimal place. The numbers are written as in (1595). In the 1646 printing they are written as “100,000,000,000,000” and “196,000,000,000,000”, and the numbers in Fig. 4 are shown as “184,160,000,000,000”, “164,953,600,000,000”, “139,159,056,000,000”, “107,778,549,760,000”, “72,096,901,529,600”, and “33,531,337,238,016”.
Anderson modified Viète’s language by invoking the explicit multiplication and division of magnitudes using the preposition in and the division bar, both borrowed from logistice speciosa. He also multiplies magnitudes in his appendix of De Æquationum Emendatione.
“26 Ecquis verò, cum magnitudines omnes sint lineæ, superficies, vel corpora, tantus proportionum suprà triplicatam, aut demum quadruplicatam rationem potest esse usus in rebus humanis, nisi fortè in sectionibus angulorum, ut ex lateribus figurarum anguli, vel ex angulis latera consequamur? | 27 Ergo à nemine hactenus adgnitum mysterium angularium sectionum, sive ad Arithmetica, sive Geometrica aperit, & edocet | Data ratione angulorum dare rationem laterum. | Facere ut numerum ad numerum, ita angulum ad angulum.” (Viète 1591, fol. 9a; 1646, p. 12). Translation adapted from (Viète 1983, p. 32).
Anderson clarifies this in Problem II in Ad Angularium Sectionum Analyticen (Viète 1615a, p. 40; 1646, p. 300). The ratio is of an integer to an integer, and it asserts effectively that one can divide a given angle into n equal parts. This is equivalent to constructing the perpendicular of the smaller angle triangle [given in Theorem V of Ad Problema (Viète 1595a, fol. 10b; 1646, p. 318)], which amounts to constructing the solution to an nth degree polynomial equation. Viète poses the problems of dividing an angle into 3, 5, and 7 parts in his Theorematia I, II, and III in Ad Problema, which he solves by numerically calculating the perpendiculars (Viète 1595a, fol. 12aff; 1646, pp. 320ff). Anderson repeats these problems in Ad Angularium Sectionum Analyticen, giving instead geometric constructions (Viète 1615a, pp. 42ff; 1646, pp. 301ff).
(Pappus 2010, p. 125).
(Euclid 1572, fol. 229b.24), from Commandino’s commentary to Proposition XIII.1.
(Regiomontanus 1584, fols. 141aff). For the table of tangents, see fol. 31a.
“Quadratum numeri cuiusdam ductum in latus & in 10,000 facit 57,732,824. In notis 10,000N + 1C æquatur 57,732,824. Quæritur quis fit numerus ille. | Numerus 57,732,824 est Cubus adiunctus Solido sub lateris Quadrato & datâ longitudine 10,000. [\(\ldots \)] ita tamen ut cum solidum dividatur per longitudinem, quod inde oritur non intelligatur radix ipsa, sed radicis Quadratum. Illud enim est legi homogeneorum attendisse.” (Viète 1600a, fol. 11b.-9; 1646, p. 182.11). As Witmer notes, both editions mistakenly write the number as 57,732,824. The translation of the last part, “Thus since the solid [\(\ldots \)]” is taken from (Viète 1983, p. 331).
“rhetics or exegetics [\(\ldots \)] eáque potissimum ad artis ordinationem pertinere, cùm reliquæ duæ exemplorum sint potius quam præceptorum, ut logicis iure concedendum est, suum éxercet officium, tam circa numeros, si de magnitudine numero explicandâ quæstio est, quàm circa longitudines, superficies, corporáve, si magnitudinem re ipsa exhiberi oporteat.” (Viète 1591, fol. 8a.27; 1646, p. 10.29). The “rhetics or exegetics” is written in Greek. Translation modified slightly from (Klein 1968, p. 346).
“Quum autem ipsum E quadratum Radix statuetur plana, hæc erit æquationis enunciato. \(\left. \begin{array}{l}~~~\hbox {E plani-quadratum.}\\ +~\hbox {B quadratum in E planum}\end{array}\right\} ~{\ae }\hbox {quabitur B quadrato in Z planum.}\)” (This is how the equation appears in (1615).) (Viète 1615b, p. 27.-3; 1646, p. 99.11). Translation adapted from (Viète 1983, p. 192).
“designatibur commodè vocabulo
vel
, veluti A in B.” (Viète 1591, fol. 5b.17; 1646, p. 5.-12). The passage continues: “[\(\ldots \)] by which it will be signified that the one has been multiplied in the other; or as others say (ut alii), that it is produced sub A & B”. Translation adapted from (Klein 1968, p. 333). Viète always multiplies species with the preposition in. He may have included the geometric term sub to strengthen the connection with geometry.
“De præceptis Logistices speciosæ. Caput. IIII. | Logistice numerosa est quæ per numeros, Speciosa quæ per species seu rerum formas exhibetur, ut pote per Alphabetica elementa. | Logistices speciosæ canonica præcepta sunt quatuor, ut numerosæ. | PRÆCEPTUM I. | Magnitudinem magnitudini addere. | Sunto duæ magnitudines A & B. Oportet alteram alteri addere.” (Viète 1591, fol. 5a; 1646, p. 4). Translation adapted from (Viète 1983, pp. 17–18).
“...adgregatæ erunt A plus B, siquidem sint simplices longitudines latitudinés-ue”. Translation adapted from (Viète 1983, p. 18).
“Et hîc se prȩbet Geometram Analysta opus verum efficiundo post alîus similis vero resolutionem:illic Logistam, potestates quascumque numero exhibitas, sive puras, sive adfectas resolvendo.” (Viète 1591, fol. 8a.-10; 1646, p. 10.-13). The translation of the second sentence is taken from (Viète 1983, p. 29).
“Neque verò in Geometricâ phrasi hic erit magna dissimilitudo: Enim verò dicet Geometra, B planum esse aggregatum quadratorum à tribus proportionalibus lineis rectis, D vero solidum quod fit ab aggregato extremarum in mediæ quadratum” (Viète 1615b, p. 11.-6; 1646, p. 91.5). Translation modified slightly from (Viète 1983, p. 173).
From Proposition III, Chapter XVIII in De Recognitione Aequationum (Viète 1615b, p. 54; 1646, p. 111). The equation in species is shown as it appears in the 1646 Opera Mathematica. In the original printing it is
$$\begin{aligned} \left. \begin{array}{l}~~~\hbox {B solidum in A}\\ -\hbox {A quadrato-quadrato.}\end{array}\right\} ~{\ae }\hbox {quetur Z plano-plano}. \end{aligned}$$“Forma autem Zetesim ineundi ex arte propriâ est, non iam in numeris suam logicam exercente, quæ fuit oscitantia veterum Analystarum, sed per logisticem sub specie noviter inducendam, feliciorem multò & potiorem numerosâ ad comparandum inter se magnitudines” (Viète 1591, fol. 4a.19; 1646, p. 1.23). Translation modified from (Viète 1983, p. 13).
“Fiat tertii hypotenusa similis ei quod fit ex hypotenusa primi in hypotenusam secundi, nempe Z in X.” (Viète 1646, p. 34.17).
(Euclid 1572, fol. 57a.-4). Others who use the same phrase are Campanus, Zamberti, Scheubel, Peletier, and Clavius.
“Cuius inventi lætitiâ adfectus, ô Diva Melusinis, tibi oves centum pro unâ Pythagoræâ immolavi.” (Viète 1595a, fol. 8b; 1646, p. 315). English translation from (Klein 1968, p. 253 n. 197). Pythagoras got only one sheep because his triangle has only has one angle at the vertex. Klein calls this a “playful remark”.
“Datâ summâ laterum & summâ Cuborum distinguere latera”.
The two exceptions among Viète’s zetetics are the last two of Book V. There the questions are already posed in terms of species.
The “\(+\)” is mistakenly shown as “−” in 1593.
The equation is shown as “ æquatur E quadrato” in the 1646 Opera Mathematica. In Witmer’s notation it is “\((4D^S-B^3)/3B\) is equal to \(E^2\)”.
Zetetic I.1.
“Les relations entre les parties d’une même figure sont ou des relations de position ou des relations de grandeurs” (Marie 1884, p. 3).
“Zeteticem autem subtilissimè omnium exercuit Diophantus in iis libris qui de re Arithmeticâ conscripti sunt. Eam verò tanquam per numeros, non etiam per species, quibus tamen usus est, institutam exhibuit, quò sua esset magis admirationi subtilitas & solertia, quando quæ Logistæ numeroso subtiliora adparent, & abstrusiora, ea utique specioso familiaria sunt & statim obvia.” (Viète 1591, fol. 8a.10; 1646, p. 10.6). Translation modified from (Viète 1983, p. 27).
“il cuore del ‘programma viètano’ ” (Freguglia 1989, p. 52).
Examples can be found in: Pappus, Book II of The Collection; Jordanus, throughout his De Numeris Datis; Part 2 of Chapter 14 of Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci; many proofs in al-Fārisī’s Foundations of Rules on Elements of Benefits; Tartaglia’s Part II Book VII; and Cardano’s Arte Magna. Some specific references: (Fibonacci 1857, pp. 358–360, 376–377; 2002, pp. 497–499, 517; al-Fārisī 1994, pp. 501–510; Tartaglia 1556, fol. 109b; Cardano 1545, fols 54b–55b).
The letter C is not avoided because it is used in logistice numerosa. Sometimes the letter N designates a species, as in Proposition XLVII of Ad Logisticem Speciosam, Notæ Priores and in zetetics IV.4 and IV.5.
“...quantitates Geometricas” (Borrel 1559, p. 120).
Translated in (Oaks 2011, p. 61).
Translated in (Oaks 2011, p. 61).
“Il e st peu de mathématiciens à qui cette science doive plus qu’à cet homme illustre” (Montucla 1758, p. 488).
“M. Viete d’avoir établi l’usage des lettres pour désigner non seulement les quantités inconnues, mais même celles qui sont connues.” (Montucla 1758, p. 488).
“Un autre avantage plus estimable encore, est la facilité qu’elle procure de pénétrer dans la nature & la composition des équations” (Montucla 1758, p. 489).
“La question, telle que se la posa Viète, était d’introduire les grandeurs elles-mêmes, sous leur formes concrète, dans les équations algébriques” (Marie 1884, p. 6).
“Es sind Grössen, nicht Zahlen”.
(Klein 1968, p. 171). Emphases in quotations from Klein are all his.
Chapter 8 in (Bos 2001).
“...in ultima analisi ricondursi alla teoria delle proporzioni, cioè, tenendo presente il libro V degli Elementi euclidei, alla forma più astratta della geometria classica” (Freguglia 1989, p. 53).
“le lettere (che non esprimono solo incognite) sono suscettibili di varie interpretazioni.” (Freguglia 1989, p. 51).
“Ma le lettere non si limitano a sostituire e a rinviare ai numeri; esse denotano anche delle grandezze geometriche: linee, piani, solidi” (Giusti 1990, p. 425).
“\(\ldots \)le lettere vengono ad assumere una posizione intermedia tra numeri e grandezze, spezzando cosí quel legame diretto che aveva determinato la separazione tra l’algebra e la geometria, ed instaurando invece un rapporto complesso, che passa attraverso il tramite della rappresentazione letterale” (Giusti 1990, p. 425).
Passages where the species are identified with numbers can be found in (Serfati 2005, pp. 158.10, 159.4, 159.12), and the whole discussion of Viète’s innovation is set against the representation of givens in geometry.
(Pappus 1982, p. 7). He follows up the proposition with a numerical example.
Translated in (Jordanus de Nemore 1981, p. 129). Again, a numerical example follows. This is the same problem as Viète’s zetetic II.5.
“n’était pas astronome, mais il était le plus grand géomètre de son temps” (Delambre 1819, p. 455).
“il créa l’Algèbre nouvelle, en représentant tous les éléments d’une question, connus ou inconnus, par des lettres de l’alphabet, les opérations à effectuer sur elles par des signes et enfin le résultat par une formule, dans laquelle il suffisait, si la même question était posée avec des données différentes, de les substituer pour obtenir immédiatement le nouveau résultat demandé” (Ritter 1895, p. 21).
Translated in (Descartes 1954, p. 2).
References
Apollonius. 1537. Apollonii Pergei Philosophi, Mathematicique Excellentissimi Opera (trans: Memus, Joannes Baptista). Venetiis: Per Bernardinum Bindonum.
Apollonius. 1566. Apollonii Pergaei Conicorum Libri Quattuor (trans: Commandino, Federico). Bononiæ: Ex officina Alexandri Benatii.
Apollonius. 1891. Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece Exstant cum Commentariis Antiquis, Edidit et Latine Interpretatus est I.L. Heiberg. Stutgardiae: in aedibus B.G. Teubneri.
Apollonius. 2000. Conics. Books I-III (trans: Taliaferro, R. Catesby). Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press.
Borrel, Jean. 1559. Logistica. Lugduni: Apud Gulielmum Rovillium.
Bos, Henk. 1996. Tradition and modernity in early modern mathematics: Viète, Descartes and Fermat. In L’Europe Mathématique: Histoires, Mythes, Identités = Mathematical Europe: History, Myth, Identity, ed. Catherine Goldstien, Jeremy Gray, and Jim Ritter, 183–204. Paris: Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Bos, Henk. 2001. Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes’ Transformation of the Early Modern Concept of Construction. New York: Springer.
Cantor, Moritz. 1900. Vorlesungen über Geschichte der Mathematik, Zweiter Bend, von 1200–1668. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
Cantù, Paola. 2010. Aristotle’s prohibition rule on kind-crossing and the definition of mathematics as a science of quantities. Synthese 174: 225–235.
Cardano, Girolamo. 1545. Artis Magnæ, sive De Regulis Algebraicis Lib. unus. Norimbergæ: per Ioh. Petreium excusum.
Charbonneau, Louis. 2006. L’algèbre au cœur du programmme analytique. In François Viète: Un Mathématicien sous la Renaissance, ed. Evelyne Barbin and Anne Boyé, 53–73. Paris: Vuibert.
Christianidis, Jean, and Jeffrey A. Oaks. 2013. Practicing algebra in late antiquity: The problem-solving of Diophantus of Alexandria. Historia Mathematica 40: 127–163.
Copernicus, Nicolaus. 1543. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium. Norimberæ: Apud Ioh. Petreium.
Crapulli, Giovanni. 1969. Mathesis Universalis: Genesi di un’Idea nel XVI Secolo. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
Dasypodius, Conrad. 1573. \({\varLambda }E \varXi \) IKON seu Dictionarium Mathematicum. Argentorati: Excudebat Nicolaus Vvyriot.
Delambre, Jean-Baptiste-Joseph. 1819. Histoire de l’Astronomie du Moyen Age. Paris: \(\text{M}^{\text{ ME }}\) V\(^{\text{ E }}\) Courcier.
Descartes, René. 1954. The Geometry of René Descartes, with a facsimile of the first edition (trans: Smith, David Eugene and Latham, Marcia L.). New York: Dover.
di Stefano, Maria Elena. 1992. Alcune considerazioni sull’In Artem Analyticem Isagoge di François Viète’. In La Matematizzazione dell’Universo, ed. Lino Conti, 153–164. [Perugia]: Porziuncola.
Diophantus. 1575. Diophanti Alexandrini Rerum Arithmeticarum Libri Sex (trans. and comm.: Xylander). Basileæ: Eusebium Episcopium & Nicolai Fr. hæredes.
Euclid. 1543. Euclide Megarense Philosopho: Solo Introduttore delle Scientie Mathematice (trans: Tartaglia, Niccolò). Vinegia: Venturino Roffinelli.
Euclid. 1550. Euclidis Megarensis, Philosophi & Mathematici Excellentissimi, Sex Libri Priores, de Geometricis Principiis, Græci & Latini [\(\ldots \)] together with Brevis Regularum Algebrae Descriptio, una cum Demonstrationibus Geometricis by Johann Scheubel. Basileae: Per Ioannem Hervagium.
Euclid. 1551. Orontij Finæi Delphinatis [\(\ldots \)] In sex priores libros Geometricorum elementorum Euclidis Megarensis [\(\ldots \)] cum ipsius Euclidis textu Græco, & interpretatione Latina Bartholomei Zamberti Veneti. Lutetiae Parisiorum: Apud Reginaldum Calderium.
Euclid. 1557. Euclidis Elementa Geometrica Demonstationum Libri Sex (trans: Peletier, Jacques). Lugduni: Apud Ioan. Tornæsium et Gul. Gazeium.
Euclid. 1560. Les Six Premiers Livres des Elements d’Euclide (trans., comm.: Forcadel, Pierre). Paris: Chez Hierosme de Marnef, & Guillaume Cauellat.
Euclid. 1562. Die sechs erste Bücher Euclidis, vom Anfang oder Grund der Geometrj (trans., comm.: Xylander (Wilhelm Holtzman)). Getruckht zu Basel.: Vollendet durch Jacob Kündig, zu Basel, in Joanns Oporini Kosten.
Euclid. 1566. Euclidis Megarensis Mathematici Clarissimi Elementa Geometrica, Libris XV, ed. François de Foix Candale. Parisiis: Apud Ioannem Royerium.
Euclid. 1572. Euclidis Elementorum Libri XV (trans: Commandino, Federico). Pisauri: Iacobus Chriegher German.
Euclid. 1574. Euclidis Elementorum Libri XV (comm: Clavius, Christoph). Romae: Apud Vincentium Accoltum.
Euclid. 1956. The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements. 2nd ed, (trans: Heath, Sir Thomas). New York: Dover.
al-Fārisī. 1994. Asās al-qawā‘id fī uṣūl al-Fawā’id, ed. by Muṣṭafā Mawāldī. Cairo: Ma‘had al-Makhṭūṭāt al-‘Arabīyah.
Ferrier, Richard. 1980. Two Exegetical Treatises of François Viète Translated, Annotated, and Explained. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Fibonacci. 1857. Liber Abaci. In Scritti di Leonardo Pisano, Matematico del Secolo Decimoterzo ed. Baldassare Boncompagni. Rome: Tipografia delle Scienze Matematiche.
Fibonacci. 2002. Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci: A translation into modern English of Leonardo Pisano’s Book of Calculation (trans: Sigler, L.E.). New York: Springer.
Fraser, Craig G. 1997. The background to and early emergence of Euler’s analysis. In Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History and Philosophy, ed. Michael Otte and Marco Panza, 47–78. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Freguglia, Paolo. 1989. Algebra e geometira in Viète. Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 9: 49–90.
Freguglia, Paolo. 2008a. Viète reader of Diophantus. An analysis of Zeteticorum Libri Quinque. Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 28: 51–95.
Freguglia, Paolo. 2008b. Les équations algébriques et la géométrie chez les algébristes du \(\text{ XVI }^{\text{ e }}\) siècle et chez Viète. In Liber Amicorum Jean Dhombres, ed. Patricia Radelet-de Grave, 148–161. Turnhout: Brepols.
Garibaldi, Antonio C. 1992. Vecchia e nuova analisi di problema geometrici da Viete a Ghetaldi. In La Matematizzazione dell’Universo, ed. Lino Conti, 165–204. [Perugia]: Porziuncola.
Ghetaldi, Marino. 1630. De Resolutione & Compositione Mathematica Libri Quinque. Opus Posthumum. Romæ: Typographia Reuerendae Camerae Apostolicae.
Giusti, Enrico. 1990. Numeri, grandezze e Géométrie. In Descartes: Il Metodo e i Saggi: Atti del Convegno per il \(350^{\circ }\) Anniversario della pubblicazione del Discours de la Méthods e degni Essais, ed. Giulia Belgioioso, Guido Cimino, Pierre Costabel, and Giovanni Papuli, 419–439. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana Fondata da G. Treccani.
Gosselin, Guillaume. 1577. De Arte Magna. Paris: Aegidium Beys.
Gosselin, Guillaume. 2016. De Arte Magna Libri IV / Traité d’Algèbre (trans. & comm.: le Guillou-Kouteynikoff, Odile). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Heeffer, Albrecht. 2008. The emergence of symbolic algebra as a shift in predominant models. Foundations of Science 13: 149–161.
Heeffer, Albrecht. 2010. From the second unknown to the symbolic equation. In Philosophical Aspects of Symbolic Reasoning in Early Modern Mathematics, ed. Albrecht Heeffer and Maarten van Dyck, 57–101. London: College Publications.
Hopkins, Burt C. 2011. The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics: Edmund Husserl and Jacob Klein. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Jordanus de Nemore. 1981. De Numeris Datis, ed. & trans. by Barnabas Hughes. Berkeley: University of California.
Klein, Jacob. 1936. Die griechische Logistik und die Entstehung der Algebra. II. Teil. Quellen un Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik Astronomie und Physic 3.2: 122–235.
Klein, Jacob. 1968. Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra (trans: Brann, Eva). Cambridge: MIT; repr. 1992.
Macbeth, Danielle. 2004. Viète, Descartes, and the emergence of modern mathematics. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25: 87–117.
Mahoney, Michael Sean. 1980. The beginnings of algebraic thought in the seventeenth century. In Descartes. Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. S. Gaukroger, 141–155. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
Mahoney, Michael Sean. 1994. The Mathematical Career of Pierre de Fermat 1601–1665. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University.
Malet, Antoni. 2006. Renaissance notions of number and magnitude. Historia Mathematica 33: 63–81.
Marie, Maximilien. 1884. Histoire des Sciences Mathématiques et physiques, Tome III. De Viète a Descartes. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Marre, Aristide (ed.). 1880. Le Triparty en la Science des Nombres par Maistre Nicolas Chuquet Parisien. Bullettino di Bibliografia e di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche 13: 593–659; 693–814.
Massa Esteve, M.R. 2012. The role of symbolic language in the transformation of mathematics. Philosophica 87: 153–193.
Maurolico, Francesco. 1575. Arithmeticorum Libri Duo. Venetijs: Apud Franciscum Franciscium Senensem.
Montucla, Jean-Étienne. 1758. Histoire des Mathematiques, Volume I. Paris: Ch. Ant. Jombert.
Monzón, Pedro. 1559. Elementa Arithmeticæ ac Geometriæ, ad disciplinas omnes, Aristoteleam præsertim Dialecticam, ac Philosophiam apprimè necessaria, ex Euclide decerpta. Valentinae: Ex typographia Ioannis Mey.
Mueller, Ian. 1981. Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunn, T.Percy. 1914. The Teaching of Algebra (Including Trigonometry). London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Oaks, Jeffrey A. 2009. Polynomials and equations in Arabic algebra. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63: 169–203.
Oaks, Jeffrey A. 2010. Polynomials and equations in medieval Italian algebra. Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 30: 23–60.
Oaks, Jeffrey A. 2011. Al-Khayyām’s scientific revision of algebra. Suhayl: Journal for the History of the Exact and Natural Sciences in Islamic Civilisation 10: 47–75.
Oaks, Jeffrey A. 2012. Algebraic symbolism in medieval Arabic algebra. Philosophica 87: 28–83.
Oaks, Jeffrey A. 2017. Irrational ‘coefficients’ in Renaissance algebra. Science in Context 30: 141–172.
Pacioli, Luca. 1494. Summa de Arithmetica, Geometria, Proportioni, & Proportionalita. Venetiis: Paganino de Paganini.
Panza, Marco. 2005. Newton et les Origines de l’Analyse: 1664–1666. Paris: Albert Blanchard.
Panza, Marco. 2006. François Viète: Between analysis and cryptanalysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 269–289.
Panza, Marco. 2007. What is new and what is old in Viète’s Analysis Restituta and Algebra Nova, and where do they come from? Some reflections on the relations between algebra and analysis before Viète. Revue d’Histoire des Mathématiques 13: 85–153.
Pappus. 1588. Pappi Alexandrini Mathematicae Collectiones (trans: Commandino, Federico). Venetiis: Apud Franciscum de Franciscis Sensem.
Pappus. 1986. Book 7 of the Collection, vol. 2, ed. with trans. and comm. by Alexander Jones. New York: Springer.
Pappus. 2010. Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection, ed. with trans. and comm. by Heike Sefrin-Weis. London: Springer.
Proclus. 1560. Procli Diadochi Lycii [\(\ldots \)] In Primvm Euclidis Elementorum librum Commentariorum ad Universam Mathematicam Disciplinam Principium Eruditionis Tradentium libri IIII (trans: Barozzi, Francesco (Barocius)). Patavii: Excudebat Gratiosus Perchacinus.
Ptolemy. 1515. Almagestum (trans: Gerard of Cremona). Venetijs: Petri Liechtenstein.
Ptolemy. 1528. Almagestum seu Magnae Constructionis Mathematicae Opus Plane divinum (trans: George of Trebizond). [Veneta]: [Luceantonii Iu[n]ta officina aere proprio, ac typis excussa \(\ldots \)].
Ptolemy. 1550. Ptolemaei Magnam Compositionem, Quam Almagestum Vocant, Libri Tredecim (trans: von Peurbach, Georg and Regiomontanus). Noribergæ: Apud Ioannem Montanum, & Ulricum Neuberum.
Ptolemy. 1998. Ptolemy’s Almagest (trans. and annotated: Toomer, G.J.). Princeton: Princeton University.
Ramus, Petrus. 1560. Algebra. Parisiis: Apud Andream Wechelum, sub Pegaso, in vico Bellovaco.
Ramus, Petrus. 1569. Arithmeticae Libri Duo: Geometriae Septem et Viginti. Basileae: Per Eusebium Episcopium, & Nicolai fratris hæredes.
Regiomontanus. 1584. Tabulæ Directionum Profectionumque. Witebergae: Imprimebantur in Officina Typographica Matthæi Welack.
Reisch, Gregor. 1504. Margarita Philosophica. [Friburgi?]: [Joannia Schotti Argentinen].
Ritter, Frédéric. 1895. François Viète Inventeur de l’Algèbre Moderne 1540–1603. Paris: Revue Occidentale.
Schneider, Martina R. 2016. Contextualizing Unguru’s 1975 attack on the historiography of ancient Greek mathematics. In Historiography of Mathematics in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Volker R. Remmert, Martina R. Schneider, and Henrik Kragh Sørensen, 245-67. Cham: Birkhäuser.
Serfati, Michel. 2005. La Révolution Symbolique: La Constitution de l’Ecriture Symolique Mathématique. Paris: Pétra.
Serfati, Michel. 2010. Symbolic revolution, scientific revolution: mathematical and philosophical aspects. In Philosophical Aspects of Symbolic Reasoning in Early Modern Mathematics, ed. Albrecht Heeffer and Maarten van Dyck, 105–124. London: College Publications.
Smith, D.E. 1953. History of Mathematics, vol. 2. New York: Dover.
Stevin, Simon. 1585. L’Arithmetique. A Leyde: De l’imprimerie de Christophe Plantin.
Stifel, Michael. 1544. Arithmetica Integra. Norimbergæ: Iohan. Petreium.
Swerdlow, Noel. 1975. The planetary theory of François Viète 1. The fundamental planetary models. Journal for the History of Astronomy 6: 185–208.
Tartaglia, Niccolò. 1556. La Secunda Parte del General Trattato de’ Numeri et Misure. Venetia: Curtio Troiano.
Tartaglia, Niccolò. 1560. La Sesta Parte del General Trattato de Numeri, et Misure. Venetia: Curtio Troiano.
Van Egmond, Warren. 1985. A catalog of François Viète’s printed and manuscript works. In Mathemata: Festschrift für Helmuth Gericke, ed. Menso Folkerts and Uta Lindgren, 359–396. Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden.
Viète, François. 1579a. Canon Mathematicus seu Ad Triangula. Lutetiæ: Apud Ioannem Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1579b. Universalium Inspectionum ad Canonem Mathematicum. Lutetiæ: Apud Ioannem Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1591. In Artem Analyticem Isagoge. Turonis: Apud Iametium Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1593a. Variorum de Rebus Mathematicis Responsorum, Liber VIII. Turonis: Apud Iamettium Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1593b. Effectionum Geometricarum Canonica Recensio. (Published as the second part of (Viète 1593)).
Viète, François. 1593c. Zeteticorum. (Published as the third part of (Viète 1593)).
Viète, François. 1593d. Supplementum Geometriæ. Turonis: Excudebat Iametius Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1595a. Ad Problema Quod omnibus Mathematicis totius orbis construendum proposuit Adrianus Romanus. Parisiis: Apud Iametium Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1595b. Pseudo-Mesolabum & Alia Quædam Adiuncta Capitula. Parisiis: Apud Iamettium Mettayer.
Viète, François. 1600a. De Numerosa Potestatum Ad Exegesim Resolutione. Parisiis: Excudebat David Le Clerc.
Viète, François. 1600b. Apollonius Gallus. Parisiis: Excudebat David Le Clerc.
Viète, François. 1615a. Ad Angularium Sectionum Analyticen. Parisiis: Apud Oliverivm de Varennes.
Viète, François. 1615b. De Æquationum Recognitione et Emendatione Tractatus Duo. Parisiis: Ex Typographia Ioannes Laquehay.
Viète, François. 1630. Les Cinq Livres des Zetetiques de Francois Viette (trans. and comm.: Vaulezard, Jean-Louis). Paris: Iulian Iacquin.
Viète, François. 1646. Opera Mathematica, ed. Frans van Schooten. Lugduni Batavorum: Ex Officinâ Bonaventuræ & Abrahami Elzeviriorum, repr. 2001.
Viète, François. 1983. The Analytic Art: Nine Studies in Algebra, Geometry, and Trigonometry from the Opus Restitutae Mathematicae Analyseos, seu, Algebrâ novâ by François Viète (trans: Witmer, T. Richard). Kent, Ohio: Kent State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Niccolò Guicciardini.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oaks, J.A. François Viète’s revolution in algebra. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 72, 245–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-018-0208-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-018-0208-0