Skip to main content
Log in

Guideline adherence of antidepressant treatment in outpatients with major depressive disorder: a naturalistic study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about guideline adherence of naturalistic antidepressant drug therapy in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of the study was to analyze guideline adherence, especially regarding treatment length, treatment evaluation and medication change strategies. We investigated 889 patients with MDD who had been admitted for inpatient treatment and were enrolled in the early medication change trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00974155). We investigated all patients at screening visit regarding previous outpatient drug treatment in the index episode, which was assessed by structured interviews. Demographic variables were obtained from patients and patients’ records. 51.0% of the patients had received previous drug treatment in the index episode, 56.6% were females, and their mean age was 40.0 years. In the 153 patients who were pharmacologically treated at least 8 weeks, medication was not changed in 129 (84.3%) patients. Patients who had a medication change in their index episode (n = 24, 15.7%) waited 71.1 weeks (±110.4) for their treatment optimization. Only 5 of those 153 patients (3.3%) had a dose increase, whereas 132 patients (86.3%) had no dose adaption at all. Antidepressant blood levels were measured in 46 patients (30.1%). We conclude that a large proportion of patients with MDD is not treated in adherence to treatment guidelines recommending treatment evaluation (e.g. therapeutic drug monitoring) and treatment change after 4 to 8 weeks in non-responders. Earlier treatment optimization may prevent long-term suffering of patients and may avoid inpatient treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R et al (2012) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2197–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sobocki P, Jonsson B, Angst J et al (2006) Cost of depression in Europe. J Mental Health Policy Econ 9:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J et al (2011) The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 21:655–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (2015) Depression fact sheet No 369. World Health Organization. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/. Accessed 16 March 2016

  5. NICE (2016) Depression in adults: recognition and management—NICE guidelines [CG90]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90. Accessed 14 March 2017

  6. DGPPN (2016) S3-Leitlinie/Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Unipolare Depression—Langfassung; 2. Auflage, Version 4. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde. http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/nvl-005l_Unipolare_Depression_2016-11.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2017

  7. APA (2010) Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. American Psychiatric Association. www.psychiatryonline.org/pb/assets/raw/sitewide/practice_guidelines/guidelines/mdd.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2017

  8. Akincigil A, Bowblis JR, Levin C et al (2007) Adherence to antidepressant treatment among privately insured patients diagnosed with depression. Med Care 45:363–369

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez A, Haro JM, Codony M et al (2006) Treatment adequacy of anxiety and depressive disorders: primary versus specialised care in Spain. J Affect Disord 96:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Milea D, Guelfucci F, Bent-Ennakhil N et al (2010) Antidepressant monotherapy: a claims database analysis of treatment changes and treatment duration. Clin Ther 32:2057–2072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Radisch J, Buchtemann D, Kastner D et al (2013) A literature- and expert-based analysis of the outpatient treatment of depressive ill people in Germany. Psychiatr Prax 40:252–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider F, Harter M, Brand S et al (2005) Adherence to guidelines for treatment of depression in in-patients. Br J Psychiatry J Mental Sci 187:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider F, Kratz S, Bermejo I et al (2004) Insufficient depression treatment in outpatient settings. German Med Sci GMS e-J 2:Doc01

  14. Smolders M, Laurant M, Verhaak P et al (2009) Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for depression and anxiety disorders is associated with recording of the diagnosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 31:460–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiegand HF, Sievers C, Schillinger M et al (2016) Major depression treatment in Germany-descriptive analysis of health insurance fund routine data and assessment of guideline-adherence. J Affect Disord 189:246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tadic A, Gorbulev S, Dahmen N et al (2010) Rationale and design of the randomised clinical trial comparing early medication change (EMC) strategy with treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with major depressive disorder–the EMC trial. Trials 11:21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicod J, Wagner S, Vonberg F et al (2015) The amount of mitochondrial DNA in blood reflects the course of a depressive episode. Biol Psychiatr 80(6):e41–e42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tadic A, Wachtlin D, Berger M et al (2016) Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression—the EMC trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 26(4):705–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tadic A, Wagner S, Gorbulev S et al (2011) Peripheral blood and neuropsychological markers for the onset of action of antidepressant drugs in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry 11:16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH et al (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20):22–33 (quiz 34–57)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. APA (2010) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association

  22. Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rush AJ, Giles DE, Schlesser MA et al (1986) The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res 18:65–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner S, Helmreich I, Lieb K et al (2011) Standardized rater training for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(1)(7)) and the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS(C30)). Psychopathology 44:68–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Young D et al (2013) Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord 150:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kendrick T (2000) Why can’t GPs follow guidelines on depression? We must question the basis of the guidelines themselves. BMJ 320:200–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G et al (2009) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet 373:746–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bschor T, Baethge C (2010) No evidence for switching the antidepressant: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of a common therapeutic strategy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 121:174–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blaschke TF, Osterberg L, Vrijens B et al (2012) Adherence to medications: insights arising from studies on the unreliable link between prescribed and actual drug dosing histories. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52:275–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Adherence to medication. New Engl J Med 353:487–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The EMC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974155) was supported by Grant No. 01KG0906 from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF). The BMBF had no role in trial design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. We are grateful to all patients who contributed to this study and to our clinical study members for their work. This includes especially Stefan Elsner, MD (Hospital for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Andernach), Julia Reiff, MD (Hospital for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Wiesbaden), Joachim Röschke, MD, PhD (Hospitals for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bad Soden and Kiedrich), Ömür Baskaya, MD, Markus Lorscheider, MD, and Alexander Teml, MD (University Medical Center Mainz, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy). We are also grateful to Armin Szegedi and Rolf Meinert (both formerly affiliated to University Medical Center Mainz), who participated in an early study phase of design development as well as to the members of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (Walter Lehmacher, Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne; Ulrich Hegerl, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig; Ekkehard Haen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David P. Herzog or Klaus Lieb.

Ethics declarations

All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in the study after a complete and extensive description. All study components were approved by the local ethical committee of the Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz (study code no: 837.166.09 (6671)) and are compliant with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Conflict of interest

Dr. Tadic has received consultancy fees from Janssen and Novartis. Prof. Roll has received lecture fees by Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, and Otsuka. All other authors report no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herzog, D.P., Wagner, S., Ruckes, C. et al. Guideline adherence of antidepressant treatment in outpatients with major depressive disorder: a naturalistic study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 267, 711–721 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0798-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0798-6

Keywords

Navigation