Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the hostile attribution bias toward ambiguous facial cues in antisocial violent offenders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggressive individuals exhibit a strong tendency to attribute hostile intent to the behavior of others, which may lead to provocation and aggravation of socially inappropriate reactions. Limited research has investigated the hostile attribution bias in the perception of facial affect. This study examined a hostile response bias to emotionally ambiguous faces in a population of 55 incarcerated antisocial violent offenders as compared to matched control subjects. Results suggest that aggression is associated with a strong preference to interpret ambiguous stimuli containing proportions of an angry expression as hostile, while there was no evidence for a generally biased interpretation of distress cues under conditions of uncertainty. Thus, the tendency to misinterpret nonverbal cues in social interactions may at least partly underlie aggressive–impulsive behavior in susceptible individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dodge KA (1980) Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Dev 51:162–170. doi:10.2307/1129603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dodge KA (2006) Translational science in action: hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Dev Psychopathol 18:791–814. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060391

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Castro BO, Veerman JW, Koops W, Bosch JD, Monshouwer HJ (2002) Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 73:916–934. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkowski BM, Robinson MD, Gordon RD, Troop-Gordon W (2007) Tracking the evil eye: trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. J Res Pers 41:650–666. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vitale JE, Newman JP, Serin RC, Bolt DM (2005) Hostile attributions in incarcerated adult male offenders: an exploration of diverse pathways. Aggress Behav 31:99–115. doi:10.1002/ab.20050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Serin RC (1991) Psychopathy and violence in criminals. J Interpers Viol 6:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh AA, Blair R (2008) Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:454–465. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nasby W, Hayden B, DePaulo BM (1980) Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility. J Abnorm Psychol 89:459–468. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.89.3.459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoaken PNS, Allaby DB, Earle J (2007) Executive cognitive functioning and the recognition of facial expressions of emotion in incarcerated violent offenders, non-violent offenders, and controls. Aggress Behav 33:412–421. doi:10.1002/ab.20194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burt SA, Mikolajewski AJ, Larson CL (2009) Do aggression and rule-breaking have different interpersonal correlates? A study of antisocial behavior subtypes, negative affect, and hostile perceptions of others. Aggress Behav 35:453–461. doi:10.1002/ab.20324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knyazev GG, Bocharov AV, Slobodskoj-Plusnin JY (2009) Hostility and gender related differences in oscillatory responses to emotional facial expressions. Aggress Behav 35:502–513. doi:10.1002/ab.20318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzberg PY (2003) Faktorstruktur, gütekriterien und konstruktvalidität der deutschen übersetzung des aggressionsfragebogens von buss und perry. Z Differ Diagn Psych 24:311–323. doi:10.1024/0170-1789.24.4.311

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buss AH, Perry M (1992) The aggression questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psych 63:452–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ackenheil M, Stotz G, Dietz-Bauer R, Vossen A (1999) Deutsche Fassung des Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik München, München

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan D, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Harnett Sheehan K, Janavs J, Dunbar G (1997) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 12:224–231. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenbarth H, Alpers GW (2008) Psychopathic personality inventory: revised, Deutsche version (PPI-R). Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lilienfeld SO, Widows MR (2005) Psychopathy personality inventory-revised (PPI-R): professional manual. In: Lutz FL (ed) Psychological Assessment Resources

  18. Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DHJ, Hawk ST, Van Knippenberg A (2010) Presentation and validation of the Radboud faces database. Cogn Emot 24:1377–1388. doi:10.1080/02699930903485076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaver JD, Lawrence AD, Passamonti L, Calder AJ (2008) Appetitive motivation predicts the neural response to facial signals of aggression. J Neurosci 28:2719–2725. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0033-08.2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carré JM, Murphy KR, Hariri AR (2011) What lies beneath the face of aggression? Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr096

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coccaro EF, McCloskey MS, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL (2007) Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression. Biol Psychiatry 62:168–178. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Manuck SB, Marsland AL, Flory JD, Gorka A, Ferrell RE, Hariri AR (2010) Salivary testosterone and a trinucleotide (CAG) length polymorphism in the androgen receptor gene predict amygdala reactivity in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35:94–104. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterzer P, Stadler C, Krebs A, Kleinschmidt A, Poustka F (2005) Abnormal neural responses to emotional visual stimuli in adolescents with conduct disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Hare RD, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Brink J, Liddle PF (2001) Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry 50:677–684. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01222-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Birbaumer N, Veit R, Lotze M, Erb M, Hermann C, Grodd W, Flor H (2005) Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:799–805. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pardini DA, Phillips M (2010) Neural responses to emotional and neutral facial expressions in chronically violent men. J Psychiatry Neurosci 35:390–398. doi:10.1503/jpn.100037

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dolan MC, Fullam RS (2009) Psychopathy and functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent responses to emotional faces in violent patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 66:570–577. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Best M, Williams JM, Coccaro EF (2002) Evidence for a dysfunctional prefrontal circuit in patients with an impulsive aggressive disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:8448–8453. doi:10.1073/pnas.112604099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fairchild G, Stobbe Y, Van Goozen SHM, Calder AJ, Goodyer IM (2010) Facial expression recognition, fear conditioning, and startle modulation in female subjects with conduct disorder. Biol Psychiatry 68:272–279. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.019

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fairchild G, Van Goozen SHM, Stollery SJ, Aitken MRF, Savage J, Moore SC, Goodyer IM (2009) Decision making and executive function in male adolescents with early-onset or adolescence-onset conduct disorder and control subjects. Biol Psychiatry 66:162–168. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.024

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schönenberg M, Louis K, Mayer S, Jusyte A (2012) Impaired identification of threat-related social information in male delinquents with antisocial personality disorder. J Personal Disord (in press). doi:10.1521/pedi_2013_27_100

  32. Willkowski BM, Robinson MD (2012) When aggressive individuals see the world more accurately: the case of perceptual sensitivity to subtle facial expressions of anger. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 38:540–553. doi:10.1177/0146167211430233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dodge KA, Price JM, Bachorowski JA, Newman JP (1990) Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol 99:385–392. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.99.4.385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Corr PJ, Perkins AM (2009) Differentiating defensive and predatory aggression: neuropsychological systems and personality in sex differences. Behav Brain Sci 32:274–275. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schönenberg M, Christian S, Gaußer AK, Mayer SV, Hautzinger M, Jusyte A (2013) Addressing perceptual insensitivity to facial affect in violent offenders: first evidence for the efficacy of a novel implicit training approach. Psychol Med (in press). doi:10.1017/S0033291713001517

  36. Penton-Voak IS, Thomas J, Gagel SH, McMurran M, McDonald S, Munafò MR (2013) Increasing recognition of happiness in ambiguous facial expressions reduces anger and aggressive behavior. Psychol Sci 24:688–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612459657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Michael Schönenberg & Aiste Jusyte

Authors
  1. Michael Schönenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aiste Jusyte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Schönenberg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schönenberg, M., Jusyte, A. Investigation of the hostile attribution bias toward ambiguous facial cues in antisocial violent offenders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 264, 61–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-013-0440-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-013-0440-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation