Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring the stigma of psychiatry and psychiatrists: development of a questionnaire

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stigma of mental illness is a severe burden for people suffering from mental illness both in private and public life, also affecting their relatives, their close social network, and the mental health care system in terms of disciplines, providers, and institutions. Interventions against the stigma of mental illness employ complementary strategies (e.g., protest, education, and contact) and address different target groups (e.g., school children and teachers, journalists, stakeholders). Within this framework, the World Psychiatric Association has adopted an Action Plan with the goal to improve the image of psychiatry and to reduce potential stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatrists. To evaluate such interventions, a questionnaire has been developed that assesses opinions and attitudes toward psychiatrists and psychiatry in different samples of medical specialists (psychiatrists and general practitioners). The questionnaire comprises scales about perceived stigma in terms of the perception of societal stereotypes, self-stigma in terms of stereotype agreement, perceived stigma in terms of structural discriminations, discrimination experiences, stigma outcomes, and attitudes toward a second medical discipline. It is available in several languages (Arab, English, German, Japanese, Polish, and Spanish) and can easily be adapted for utilization in other medical specialties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaebel W, Baumann A, Witte M, Zäske H (2002) Public attitudes towards people with schizophrenia in six German cities under special consideration of schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 252:278–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stuart H, Arboleda-Flôrez J (2001) Community attitudes towards people with schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 46:245–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Link BG, Cullen FT, Struening E, Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP (1989) A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: an empirical assessment. Am Sociol Rev 54:400–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, Sartorius N, Leese M, For the INDIGO Study Group (2009) Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 373:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. World Psychiatric Association (1998) Fighting stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia. World Psychiatric Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaebel W, Zäske H, Baumann A (2004) Stigmatisierung und Diskriminierung psychisch Erkrankter als Herausforderung für die Gesundheitsversorgung in Deutschland. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 101:A 3253–3255. Heft 48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schulze B, Richter-Werling M, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2003) Crazy? So what! Effects of a school project on student′s attitudes towards people with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scand 107:142–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaebel W, Ahrens W, Schlamann P (2010) Konzeption und Umsetzung von Interventionen zur Entstigmatisierung seelischer Erkrankungen: Empfehlungen und Ergebnisse aus Forschung und Praxis. Aktionsbündnis Seelische Gesundheit, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Psychiatric Association (2003) Fighting stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia. Training manual version II. World Psychiatric Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sartorius N, Schulze H (2005) Reducing the stigma of mental illness. A report from a global programme of the World Psychiatric Association. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaebel W, Zäske H, Baumann AE, Klosterkötter J, Maier W, Decker P, Möller HJ (2008) Evaluation of the German WPA „Program against stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia—Open the doors“: results from representative telephone surveys before and after three years of antistigma interventions. Schizophr Res 98:184–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maj M (2008) The WPA Action Plan 2008–2011. World Psychiatry 7:129–130

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sartorius N, Gaebel W, Cleveland HR, Stuart H, Akiyama T, Arboleda-Florez J, Baumann AE, Gureje O, Jorge MR, Kastrup M, Suzuki Y, Tasman A (2010) WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. World Psychiatry 9:131–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Project group on Stigma of Psychiatry and Psychiatrists: Wolfgang Gaebel (principal investigator), Heather Stuart (co-principal investigator), Julio Arboleda-Flórez (co-investigator), Norman Sartorius (consultant). WPA Task Force on Stigma of Psychiatry and Psychiatrists: Tsuyoshi Akiyama, Japan; Anja E. Baumann, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Denmark; Wolfgang Gaebel, Germany; Oye Gureje, Nigeria; Miguel Roberto Jorge, Brazil; Marianne Kastrup, Denmark; Norman Sartorius (Chair), Switzerland; Heather Stuart, Canada; Yuriko Suzuki, Japan; Allan Tasman, USA.

Collaborating centers: Belarus: Dzmytry Krupchanka, Ekaterina Padalko; Brazil: Miguel Jorge, Thiago M. Fidalgo; Chile: Veronica Larach; Denmark: Marianne Kastrup; Egypt: Tarek A. Okasha; Germany: Wolfgang Gaebel; Helen-Rose Cleveland; Kathrin Samjeske; Japan: Tsuyoshi Akiyama, Yuriko Suzuki; Kenya: David M. Ndetei; New Zealand: Graham Mellsop, Lyndy Matthews; Nigeria: Oye Gureje, Lola Kola; Poland: Marek Jarema, Magdalena Tyszkowska; USA: Allan Tasman, Joyce Spurgeoun.

The authors would like to thank Kathrin Samjeske for study coordination and Marie Ilic for her contribution to the questionnaire development. The authors would also like to thank the psychiatrists at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Düsseldorf who participated in the qualitative survey.

The study was funded by a grant of the World Psychiatric Association and an additional grant of the Stiftung Seelische Gesundheit [German Mental Health Foundation].

Conflict of interest

W. Gaebel is member of the Scientific Advisory Board (Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation) and received symposium support (Lilly Germany, Janssen Cilag Germany).

M. Kastrup is member of the Board of LINF (Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation).

N. Sartorius participated at scientific symposia and meetings organized by Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Janssen and Pfizer companies and served as consultant to Eli Lilly, Lundbeck and Servier companies. The association which he presides received funds for its work from Eli Lilly, Lundbeck and Pfizer.

All further authors (HZ, HRC, HS, JAF, TA, OG, MRJ, YS, AT) declare that they have no conflict of interest. The nature of this project however justifies to say that no author has a conflict of interest in the project. No author received honoraria for work on this paper.

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded by the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Gaebel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaebel, W., Zäske, H., Cleveland, HR. et al. Measuring the stigma of psychiatry and psychiatrists: development of a questionnaire. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 261 (Suppl 2), 119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0252-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0252-0

Keywords

Navigation