Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cochlear implantation in incomplete partition type I

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To share our experience in cochlear implanted patients with incomplete partition type I, to compare it with the literature results and to disclose difficulties facing cochlear implant teams dealing with these patients.

Materials and methods

Clinical records of 1089 cochlear implant procedures in a cochlear implant center were reviewed and data of patients who had incomplete partition type I were enrolled in this study. Their auditory and speech performances were evaluated 3 years after the implantation.

Results

Eighteen cases (1.65%) had incomplete partition type I. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher was encountered during opening the cochlea in 15 patients (83.3%). There were no cases of persistent CSF leak or postoperative meningitis. In 61.1% of patients, some additional anomalies were found during the operation. Although in 55.6% of cases no electrically evoked compound action potential was detected even in long-term follow-up, all patients had satisfactory auditory and speech outcome.

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation is a relatively safe and effective treatment for patients who have incomplete partition type I, even if the procedure may be somehow challenging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 97:2–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sennaroglu L, Saatci I (2002) A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope 112:2230–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sennaroglu L (2010) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations—a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 11:4–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luntz M, Balkany T, Telischi FF, Hodges AV (1997) Surgical techniques for cochlear implantation of the malformed inner ear. Am J Otol 18(6 Suppl):s66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Farhood Z, Nguyen SA, Miller SC, Holcomb MA, Meyer TA, Rizk HG (2017) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations: systematic review of speech perception outcomes and intraoperative findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156:783–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH (1995) Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:312–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen C, Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, O'Donoghue GM (2001) Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 22:631–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robbins AM, Osberger MJ (1992) Meaningful use of speech scale. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berrettini S, Forli F, De Vito A, Bruschini L, Quaranta N (2013) Cochlear implant in incomplete partition type I. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33:56–62

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suk Y, Lee JH, Lee KS (2015) Surgical outcomes after cochlear implantation in children with incomplete partition type I: comparison with deaf children with a normal inner ear structure. Otol Neurotol 36:e11–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kontorinis G, Goetz F, Giourgas A, Lenarz T, Lanfermann H, Giesemann AM (2012) Radiological diagnosis of incomplete partition type I versus type II: significance for cochlear implantation. Eur Radiol 22:525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Catli T, Uckan B, Olgun L (2015) Speech and language development after cochlear implantation in children with bony labyrinth malformations: long-term results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3131–3136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eftekharian A, Amizadeh M (2014) Cerebrospinal fluid gusher in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 15:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamogashira T, Akamatsu Y, Kashio A, Ogata E, Karino S, Kakigi A, Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T (2016) Development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Acta Otolaryngol 136:78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Minami SB, Takegoshi H, Shinjo Y, Enomoto C, Kaga K (2015) Usefulness of measuring electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with inner ear malformations during cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 135:1007–10150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors do not have any financial or material support for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kourosh Eftekharian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eftekharian, A., Eftekharian, K., Mokari, N. et al. Cochlear implantation in incomplete partition type I. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 2763–2768 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05534-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05534-1

Keywords

Navigation