Skip to main content
Log in

Using peak direct subglottic pressure level as an objective measure during medialization thyroplasty: a prospective study

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Type I medialization thyroplasty (MT) was introduced by Isshiki more than 40 years ago. It is one of the most widely used surgical options to correct glottic insufficiency. Intraoperatively, the surgeon relies solely on perceptual subjective measures to help to achieve an optimal glottic closure by bringing the affected vocal fold closer to the midline in order to close the glottic gap. One of the challenges of MT is the persistence of symptoms due to incorrect choice of implant size. As of now, no standard objective measure is being used to determine the optimal implant size needed to achieve the glottic closure required. Peak direct subglottic pressure (PDSGP) is one of the aerodynamic objective measurements of vocal efficiency that significantly increases in cases of glottic insufficiency. It is easily measured during MT by inserting a catheter through the cricothyroid membrane. A prospective study was carried out on patients undergoing MT using the Montgomery Implant®. Choice of implant size was carried out based on the standard perceptual subjective assessment by the operating surgeon and was based on degree of glottic closure and voice quality. PDSGP was recorded for each implant size and then we tested the agreement between the chosen implant size and the lowest PDSGP. The agreement between the implant size of choice and the lowest PDSGP recorded was 62.5 % [CI 44–79 %]. PDSGP was easy to measure and resulted in no complications. PDSGP is a useful tool that could assist in the choice of the correct implant size needed during MT.

Level of evidence: 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Remacle M, Lawson G (2007) Results with collagen injection into the vocal folds for medialization. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15(3):148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen CA, Gartner-Schmidt J, Casiano R, Anderson TD, Johnson F, Reussner L, Remacle M et al (2007) Vocal fold augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(2):198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Isshiki N, Morita H, Okamura H, Hiramoto M (1974) Thyroplasty as a new phonosurgical technique. Acta Otolaryngol 78(1–6):451–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Montgomery WW, Blaugrund SM, Varvares MA (1993) Thyroplasty: a new approach. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102(8):571–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Isshiki N, Tanabe M, Sawada M (1978) Arytenoid adduction for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol 104(10):555–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tucker HM (1989) Long-term results of nerve-muscle pedicle reinnervation for laryngeal paralysis. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98(9):674–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Omori K, Slavit DH, Kacker A, Blaugrund SM, Kojima H (2000) Effects of thyroplasty type I on vocal fold vibration. Laryngoscope 110(7):1086–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giovanni A, Gras R, Grini MN, Robert D, Vallicioni JM, Triglia JM (1997) Médialisation d’une corde vocale paralysée par implant de polytétrafluoroéthylène expansé (Gore-Tex®). In: Annales d’oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, vol 114, no. 5. Elsevier Masson, pp 158–164

  9. Netterville JL, Stone RE, Civantos FJ, Luken ES, Ossoff RH (1993) Silastic medialization and arytenoid adduction: the Vanderbilt experience a review of 116 phonosurgical procedures. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102(6):413–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundeberg MR, Flint PW, Purcell LL, McMurray JS, Cummings CW (2011) Revision medialization thyroplasty with hydroxylapatite implants. Laryngoscope 121(5):999–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inagi K, Khidr AA, Ford CN, Bless DM, Heisey DM (1997) Correlation between vocal functions and glottal measurements in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope 107(6):782–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundy DS, Casiano RR, Xue JW (2004) Can maximum phonation time predict voice outcome after thyroplasty type I? Laryngoscope 114(8):1447–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dejonckere PH (2010) Assessment of voice and respiratory function. Surgery of larynx and trache. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matar N, Remacle M, Bachy V, Lawson G, Giovanni A, Lejoly-Devuyst V, Legou T (2012) Objective measurement of real time subglottic pressure during medialization thyroplasty: a feasibility study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1171–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings CW, Purcell LL, Flint PW (1993) Hydroxylapatite laryngeal implants for medialization preliminary report. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102(11):843–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mastronikolis NS, Remacle M, Kiagiadaki D, Lawson G, Bachy V, Van Der Vorst S (2013) Medialization thyroplasty for voice restoration after transoral cordectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(7):2071–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woo P, Pearl AW, Hsiung M-W, Som P (2001) Failed medialization laryngoplasty: management by revision surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(6):615–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman MR, Witt RE, McCulloch TM, Jiang JJ (2011) Preliminary investigation of adjustable balloon implant for type I thyroplasty. Laryngoscope 121(4):793–800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zapater E, García-Lliberós A, López I, Moreno R, Basterra J (2014) A new device to improve the location of a montgomery thyroplasty prosthesis. Laryngoscope 124(7):1659–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giovanni A, Demolin D, Heim C, Triglia J-M (2000) Estimated subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(5):500–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ketelslagers K, De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning P (2007) Relevance of subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(5):519–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Le Huche F, Allali A (1990) La voix, pathologies vocales. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moahmmed I. Almohizea.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflicts of interest.

All research involving human participants was subject to ethics committee review by the Hospital Ethics Committee and Review Board and deemed to be compliant.

Informed consent was obtained by all patients in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almohizea, M.I., Prasad, V.M.N., Fakhoury, R. et al. Using peak direct subglottic pressure level as an objective measure during medialization thyroplasty: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 2607–2611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4059-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4059-5

Keywords

Navigation