Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Translation and validation of EORTC QLQ-H&N 35 into Moroccan Arabic for ENT head and neck cancer patients in Morocco

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disease-specific quality of life (QOL) measures have enhanced the capacity of outcome measures to evaluate subtle changes and differences between groups. As many of the QOL measures have been developed in English, they require translation to ensure their usefulness in a multi-cultural and/or international society. Published guidelines provide formal methods to achieve cross-culturally comparable versions of a QOL tool. The aim of this study was to adapt the head and neck specific module of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N 35 questionnaire) into Moroccan Arabic and to determine its psychometric properties. After translation, back translation and pretesting of the pre-final version, the translated version was submitted to a committee of professionals composed by otolaryngologists and epidemiologists. The psychometric properties were tested in patients with ENT cancer. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s alpha and the test–retest reliability using interclass correlation coefficients. Construct validity was assessed by examining item convergent and divergent validity. It was also tested using Spearman’s correlation between QLQ-H&N 35 scales and EQ-5D. The study was conducted in 120 patients. The Moroccan version was internally reliable, Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.71 for “trouble with social contact” to 0.94 for “senses impairment”, indicating good internal consistency. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, which ranged from 0.64 for “speech trouble” to 0.89 for “physical activities”. The instrument demonstrated a good construct and concomitant validity. We have developed a semantically equivalent translation with cultural adaptation of EORTC QLQ-H&N 35 questionnaire. The assessment of its measurement properties showed that it is quite reliable and a valid measure of the effect of cancer on the quality of life in Moroccan patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World health organisation (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organisation project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 2:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Calman KC (1984) Quality of life in cancer patients—an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10:124–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schipper H, Clinch J, Powell V (1990) Definitions and conceptuals issues. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Raven Press, New York, pp 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shumakher SA, Anderson RT, Czajkowski SM (1990) Psychological tests and scales. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. RavenPress, New York, pp 95–113

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cella DF, Cherin EA (1988) Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Compre Ther 14:69–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brousse C, Boisaubert B (2007) La qualité de vie et ses mesures. La Revue de médecine interne 28:458–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kazi R, De Cordova J, Kanagalingam J, Venkitaraman R, Nutting CM, Clarke P et al (2007) Quality of life following total laryngectomy: assessment using the UW-QOL scale. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 69:100–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morton RP, Izzard ME (2003) Quality-of-life outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. World J Surg 27:884–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spitzer WO, Dobson JA, Hall J et al (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. J Chron Dis 34:585–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S (1976) The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of health status measure. Int J Health Serv 6:393–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) A 36-items short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacEwen J (1987) The Nottingham Health profile. In: Walker SR, Rosen RM (eds) Quality of life assessment and application Lancaster. MTP Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams A (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16(3):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B (1993) The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer inst 85:364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nejjari et al (2014) Translation and validation of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 into Moroccan version for cancer patients in Morocco. BMC Res Notes 7:228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46(12):1417–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alomso J et al (1996) Evaluating quality-of-life and health-status instrument: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 18:979–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X (1998) A model of equivalence in the cultural adptation of HRQL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 7:323–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, Johnson C, Scott N, Bottomley A (2009) EORTC Quality Of Life Group translation procedure, 3rd edn. March 2009. Copyright EORTC, Brussels, 1998, 2002, 2009. D/2009/6136/001. ISBN 978-2-930064-38-3

  21. Streiner DL, Norman GR (2003) Health measurment scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khoudri I, Abidi K, Madani N, Zekraoui A, Zeggwagh AA, Aboukal R (2008) Adaptation trans-culurelle et validation de la version arabe pour le Maroc de l’EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) en réanimation. 36e congrès de la SRLF. Paris 2008

  23. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D (2001) Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group: The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual 3rd edn. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels

  24. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) UICC (Union for International Cancer Control). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 36–42

  26. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B (1993) The European Organisation for Research and treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer inst 85:364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoopman R, Muller MJ, Terwee CB, Aaronson NK (2006) Translation and validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 for use among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority cancer patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 42:1839–1847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measurment health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM et al (2000) A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. Eur J Cancer 36:1796–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gabor T, Toshihiro S, Yasukazu M et al (2005) A pilot study of the translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the EORTC head and neck cancer quality of life questionnaire module for use in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx 32:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank “Research committee of the Faculty of Medecine of Fez—University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah” for its support. We thank EORTC research committee for their substantial help in the translation and validation process of the QLQ-H&N 35 Questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Ouattassi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouattassi, N., Benmansour, N., ElFakir, S. et al. Translation and validation of EORTC QLQ-H&N 35 into Moroccan Arabic for ENT head and neck cancer patients in Morocco. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 2727–2734 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3808-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3808-1

Keywords

Navigation