Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term symptom relief after septoplasty

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 06 April 2016

Abstract

The results for long-term symptom relief after septoplasty are contradictory in reviewed publications but the findings suggest that results are unsatisfactory. In this study, we analyzed and compared short- and long-term symptom relief after septoplasty and factors possibly associated with symptom relief. 111 patients that underwent septoplasty between 2008 and 2010 were included in the study. Medical charts were reviewed for preoperative characteristics and assessments. Data on short-term symptom relief (6 months) were retrieved from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Septoplasty; data on long-term symptom relief (34–70 months) were collected through a questionnaire. Upon the 34–70 month follow-up, 53 % of the patients reported that symptoms either remained or had worsened and 83 % reported nasal obstruction. Degree of symptom relief was significantly higher among patients not reporting nasal obstruction than among patients reporting nasal obstruction at long-term follow-up. The proportion of patients that reported “my symptoms are gone” declined from 53 % after 6 months to 18 % after 34–70 months. None of the factors taken into consideration, age at surgery, gender, follow-up time, primary operation/reoperation, history of nasal trauma, self-reported allergy, rhinometric obstruction, or same sided rhinometric, clinical and subjective nasal obstruction were associated with symptom relief. The long-term results after septoplasty are unsatisfactory. A majority of patients report that their symptoms remain after septoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho WK, Yuen AP, Tang KC, Wei WI, Lam PK (2004) Time course in the relief of nasal blockage after septal and turbinate surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:324–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jessen M, Ivarsson A, Malm L (1989) Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 14:231–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohlin L, Dahlqvist A (1994) Nasal airway resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: a ten-year follow-up study. Rhinology 32:195–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dinis PB, Haider H (2002) Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol 23:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Triaridis A, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G (2005) Long term results following nasal septal surgery. Focus on patients’ satisfaction. Auris Nasus Larynx 32:369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pirilä T, Tikanto J (2009) Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the preoperative screening of septal surgery patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:605–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toyserkani NM, Frisch T (2012) Are too many septal deviations operated on? A retrospective patient’s satisfaction questionnaire with 11 years follow-up. Rhinology 50:185–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haavisto LE, Sipilä JI (2013) Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and visual analogue scale before and after septal surgery: a prospective 10-year follow-up. Clin Otolaryngol 38:23–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmström M, Kumlien J (1988) A clinical follow-up of septal surgery with special attention to the value of preoperative rhinomanometric examination in the decision concerning operation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 13:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmström M (2010) The use of objective measures in selecting patients for septal surgery. Rhinology 48:387–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Öppna jämförelser av hälso- och sjukvårdens kvalitet och effektivitet (2011) Jämförelser mellan landsting 2010. Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. www.skl.se/publikationer ISBN 978-91-7164-742-9 (Swedish)

  12. Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Nilsson P, Jönsson F, Marcusson A (2011) Nasal cavity size, airway resistance, and subjective sensation after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 140:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thulesius HL, Thulesius HO, Jessen M (2009) What happens to patients with nasal stuffiness and pathological rhinomanometry left without surgery? Rhinology 47:24–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jessen M, Malm L (1984) The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 22:157–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists for either Carolina Sundh or Ola Sunnergren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ola Sunnergren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundh, C., Sunnergren, O. Long-term symptom relief after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2871–2875 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3406-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3406-7

Keywords

Navigation