Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical efficacy of the Romberg test using a foam pad to identify balance problems: a comparative study with the sensory organization test

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modified Romberg test using a foam pad (“MRuFP”) as a bedside examination has been used to assess the function of the complex sensory input needed for upright stance. The objective of this study was to assess its clinical value detecting vestibular falls in comparison with the sensory organization test (SOT), the gold standard. In total, 80 patients who had undergone the MRuFP, SOT, and bithermal caloric tests were included in this study. The MRuFPs were performed on two (height 12 cm, MRu2FP) or three (18 cm, MRu3FP) layers of foam pads. The odds ratios of falling on SOT were calculated. Iterative algorithms were used for linear curve fitting between the balance time on the MRuFP and SOT equilibrium score (ES). The diagnostic performance of MRuFP under different conditions was poor, with low sensitivity (0.07–0.63), when the results of SOT were used as the gold standard. However, the odds ratios of failing SOT condition 5 were 6.78 (95 % CI = 1.26–36.50) for patients with abnormal findings on eyes closed (EC)–MRu2FP and 10.91 (95 % CI = 2.58–46.11) for those on the EC–MRu3FP in patients without caloric weakness. In patients with caloric weakness, the odds ratio of failing SOT condition 5 for patients with abnormal findings on EC–MRu2FP was 7.0 (95 % CI = 0.69–70.74, p > 0.05), and 32.0 for those on EC-MRu3FP (95 % CI = 2.81–364.7). A linear equation was presented as the model fit (adjusted R 2 = 0.355) predicting the SOT condition 5 ES according to the balance time on EC–MRu3FP. In conclusion, the EC–MRu3FP, as a bedside examination, correlated well with SOT condition 5 as an objective measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Hoffman HJ, Sklare DA, Schubert MC (2011) The modified Romberg Balance Test: normative data in US adults. Otol Neurotol 32:1309–1311

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieschalk M, Delank KW, Stoll W (1995) Quantitative evaluation of the Romberg test. Laryngorhinootologie 74:489–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soto A, Labella T, Santos S, Rio MD, Lirola A, Cabanas E et al (2004) The usefulness of computerized dynamic posturography for the study of equilibrium in patients with Meniere’s disease: correlation with clinical and audiologic data. Hear Res 196:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Black FO (2001) What can posturography tell us about vestibular function? Ann N Y Acad Sci 942:446–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart MG, Chen AY, Wyatt JR, Favrot S, Beinart S, Coker NJ et al (1999) Cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic evaluation of vertigo. Laryngoscope 109:600–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo JW, Kim JS, Hong SK (2011) Vibration-induced nystagmus after acute peripheral vestibular loss: comparative study with other vestibule-ocular reflex tests in the yaw plane. Otol Neurotol 32:466–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Berardino F, Filipponi E, Barozzi S, Giordano G, Alpini D, Cesarani A (2009) The use of rubber foam pads and “sensory ratios” to reduce variability in static posturography assessment. Gait Posture 29:158–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujimoto C, Murofushi T, Chihara Y, Ushio M, Sugasawa K, Yamaguchi T et al (2009) Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory dependence. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1408–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortuno-Cortes MA, Martin-Sanz E, Barona-de Guzman R (2008) Static posturography versus clinical tests in elderly people with vestibular pathology. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59:334–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baloh RW, Jacobson KM, Beykirch K, Honrubia V (1998) Static and dynamic posturography in patients with vestibular and cerebellar lesions. Arch Neurol 55:649–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Black FO, Wall C 3rd (1981) Comparison of vestibulo-ocular and vestibulospinal screening tests. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 89:811–817

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans MK, Krebs DE (1999) Posturography does not test vestibulospinal function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:164–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kong WJ, Liu B, Wu Q, Wu YY (2007) Postural characteristics of healthy subjects under different thickness of foam. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 42:721–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel M, Fransson PA, Lush D, Gomez S (2008) The effect of foam surface properties on postural stability assessment while standing. Gait Posture 28:649–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Telian SA, Shepard NT, Smith-Wheelock M, Hoberg M (1991) Bilateral vestibular paresis: diagnosis and treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104:67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turano K, Herdman SJ, Dagnelie G (1993) Visual stabilization of posture in retinitis pigmentosa and in artificially restricted visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:3004–3010

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobson GP, McCaslin DL, Piker EG, Gruenwald J, Grantham S, Tegel L (2011) Insensitivity of the “Romberg test of standing balance on firm and compliant support surfaces” to the results of caloric and VEMP tests. Ear Hear 32:e1–e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamid MA, Hughes GB, Kinney SE (1991) Specificity and sensitivity of dynamic posturography. A retrospective analysis. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 481:596–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goto F, Kabeya M, Kushiro K, Ttsutsumi T, Hayashi K (2011) Effect of anxiety on antero-posterior postural stability in patients with dizziness. Neurosci Lett 487:204–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Celebisoy N, Bayam E, Gulec F, Kose T, Akyurekli O (2009) Balance in posterior and horizontal canal type benign paroxysmal positional vertigo before and after canalith repositioning maneuvers. Gait Posture 29:520–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (Grant No. 03-2011-007).

Conflict of interest

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ja-Won Koo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, S.K., Park, J.H., Kwon, S.Y. et al. Clinical efficacy of the Romberg test using a foam pad to identify balance problems: a comparative study with the sensory organization test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2741–2747 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3273-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3273-2

Keywords

Navigation