Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical characteristics of spontaneous cholesteatoma of the external auditory canal in children comparing with cholesteatoma in adults

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC) in children through evaluation of the clinical and radiologic features as well as treatment outcomes. The clinical records were retrospectively reviewed for children under 15 years of age diagnosed with spontaneous EACC between March 2004 and December 2011. The clinical data of adults diagnosed with spontaneous EACC during the same period were evaluated to compare with EACC in children. Eight patients (3 males and 5 females) with pediatric EACC and 18 patients (7 males and 11 females, 20 ears) with adult EACC were included within the boundary of the study. The mean ages were 12.4 years (age range 9–15) for pediatric EACC and 49.8 years (age range 29–79) for adult EACC patients. Follow-up periods ranged from 8 to 86 months (mean 32.5 ± 8.62) in pediatric EACC and from 6 to 72 months (mean 22.2 ± 5.36) in adult EACC. Pediatric EACC, showed involvement most commonly in the posterior wall, while the inferior wall was most commonly involved in adult EACC. Pediatric EACC tended to show a more focal involvement and was not as extensive as adult EACC. Extension into the adjacent structures was similar in both groups, but bony destruction was more common in the adult group. Two children and eight adult patients were treated with surgery, but four adult cases needed more extensive surgical treatment because their disease was widely spread to included areas such as the mastoid segment of facial nerve and the temporomandibular joint. Six pediatric cases treated with conservative management showed no progression of disease on physical examination at the last visit, but two cases of adults progressed and required canaloplasty. Pediatric EACC shows less aggressive behavior compared to adult EACC. Adequate management may work better in pediatric than in adult EACC, even though the treatment modality is conservative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anthony PF, Anthony WP (1982) Surgical treatment of external auditory canal cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 92:70–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Owen HH, Rosborg J, Gaihede M (2006) Cholesteatoma of the external ear canal: etiological factors, symptoms and clinical findings in a series of 48 cases. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 6:16

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holt JJ (1992) Ear canal cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 102:608–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pipergerdes JC, Kramer BM (1980) Keratosis obturans and external auditory canal cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 90:383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palva A, Karma P, Kärjä J (1977) Cholesteatoma in children. Arch Otolaryngol 103:74–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shohet JA, De Jong AL (2002) The management of pediatric cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 35:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoon YH, Park CH, Kim EH, Park YH (2008) Clinical characteristics of external auditory canal cholesteatoma in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:661–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng YF, Chiao AS, Lien CF (2005) Pediatric external canal cholesteatoma with extensive invasion into the mastoid cavity. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:561–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quantin L, Fernandez SC, Moretti J (2002) Congenital cholesteatoma of external auditory canal. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 62:175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JH, Woo HY, Yoo YS, Cho KR (2011) Congenital primary cholesteatoma of external auditory canal. Am J Otolaryngol 32:247–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naim R, Linthicum R, Shen T, Bran G, Horman K (2005) Classification of the external auditory canal cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 115:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paparella MM, Jung TT (1984) Intact-bridge tympanomastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92(3):334–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bujia J, Holly A, Antoli-Candela F, Tapia MG, Kastenbauer E (1996) Immunobiological peculiarities of cholesteatoma in children: quantification of epithelial proliferation by MIB1. Laryngoscope 106:865–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dornelles Cde C, da Costa SS, Meurer L, Rosito LP, da Silva AR, Alves SL (2009) Comparison of acquired cholesteatoma between pediatric and adult patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1553–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubach P, Mantokoudis G, Banz Y, Caversaccio M, Senn P (2013) Histopathologic case of the month—idiopathic ear canal cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 34(5):e40–e41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naim R, Shen T, Riedel F, Bran G, Sadick H (2005) Regulation of apoptosis in external auditory canal cholesteatoma by hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. ORL 67:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naim R, Sadick H, Schafer C, Hormann K (2004) External auditory canal cholesteatoma: analysis of the integrity of the tissue structure. Int J Mol Med 14:601–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin YS (2009) Surgical results of external canal cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 129:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Makino K, Amatsu M (1986) Epithelial migration on the tympanic membrane and external canal. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 243:39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubach P, Mantokoudis G, Caversaccio M (2010) Ear canal cholesteatoma: meta-analysis of clinical characteristics with update on classification, staging and treatment. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonding P, Raven T (2008) Primary cholesteatoma of the external auditory canal: is the epithelial migration defective? Otol Neurotol 29:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Terayama Y, Sakata A, Murata Y, Harada K, Ohashi M (2010) Burow’s solution treatment for external auditory canal and mastoid cavity cholesteatoma. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 113(6):549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rauch F (2006) Watching bone cells at work: what we can see from bone biopsy. Pediatr Nephrol 21:457–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Woo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, C.W., Baek, SH., Lee, SH. et al. Clinical characteristics of spontaneous cholesteatoma of the external auditory canal in children comparing with cholesteatoma in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 3179–3185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2820-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2820-6

Keywords

Navigation