Skip to main content
Log in

Lacrimal sac dacryolith (76 cases): a predictive factor for successful endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy?

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate whether the presence of dacryolith is a predictive factor for successful dacryocystorhinostomy. The success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) performed to relieve obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct was evaluated according to the presence of dacryolithiasis. The surgical results of patients with (group I) and without dacryoliths (group II) were analysed and compared 1-year post surgery. A total of 771 EDCRs performed from 1994 to 2010 were evaluated. Dacryolith was found in 76/771 procedures (9.9 %). Complete improvement was achieved significantly more frequently in group I (76/76; 100.0 %) than in group II (633/695; 91.1 %; p < 0.001). EDCRs were performed significantly more frequently in people aged 31–50-years, the average age of the group I was 41.1 years (range 18–72 years), of the group II 53.3 years (range 3 months–86 years; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the female-to-male ratio in the two groups. The presence of dacryoliths is a predictive factor for successful endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yazici B, Hammad AM, Meyer DR (2001) Lacrimal sac dacryoliths predictive factors and clinical characteristics. Ophthalmology 108:1308–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paulsen F (2007) Pathophysiological aspects of PANDO, dacryolithiasis, dry eye, and punctum plugs. In: Weber RK, Keerl R, Schaefer SD, Della Rocca RC (eds) Atlas of lacrimal surgery, Springer, Berlin pp 15–27

  3. Rosen WJ, Rose GE (2000) Intranasal passage of dacryoliths. Br J Ophthalmol 84:799–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berlin AJ, Rath R, Rich L (1980) Lacrimal system dacryoliths. Ophthalmic Surg 11:435–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkins RB, Pressly JP (1980) Diagnosis and incidence of lacrimal calculi. Opthalmic Surg 11:787–789

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Repp DJ, Burkat CN, Lucarelli MJ (2009) Lacrimal excretory system concretions: canalicular and lacrimal sac. Ophthalmology 116:2230–2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammoudi DS, Tucker NA (2011) Factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Sug. 27:266–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Komínek P, Červenka S, Pniak T, Zeleník K, Tomášková H, Matoušek P (2011) Revision endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies: analysis of 44 procedures. Rhinology 49:375–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sprekelsen MB, Barberán MT (1996) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope 106(2):187–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JC, Moon YE, Kim MS, Oh JK, Kim HA, Choi MY, Shim WS (2009) The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorinolarnygol 2:141–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stupp T, Spaniol K, Prokosch V, Thanos S, Pavlidis M (2010) Einflussfaktoren auf den langfristigen erfolg von tränenwegoperationen und der prognostische wert der dakryozystografie. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 227:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zenk J, Karathanis AD, Psychogios G, Franzke K, Koch M, Hornung J, Velegrakis GA, Iro H (2009) Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1733–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Özer Ö, Eskiizmir G, Ünlü H, Isisag A, Aslan A (2011) Chronic inflammation: a poor prognostic factor for endosopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:839–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawes MJ (1988) The dacryolithiasis syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1988(4):87–90

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herzig S, Hurwitz JJ (1979) Lacrimal sac calculi. Can J Opthatomol 14:17–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones LT (1965) Tear-sac foreign bodies. Am J Ophthalmol 60:111–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berlin AJ, Rath R, Rich L (1980) Lacrimal system dacryoliths. Ophthalmic Surg 11:435–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baratz KH, Bartley GB, Campbell RJ, Garrity JA (1991) An eyelash nidus for dacryoliths of the lacrimal excretory and secretory systems. Am J Ophthalmol 111:624–627

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andreou P, Rose GR (2002) Clinical presentation of patients with dacryolithiasis. Ophthalmology 109:1573–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mannor GE, Millman AL (1992) The prognostic value of preoperative dacryocystography in endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 113:134–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Institutional support of the Ministry of Health No 2 RVO-FNOs/2013.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Komínek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Komínek, P., Červenka, S., Zeleník, K. et al. Lacrimal sac dacryolith (76 cases): a predictive factor for successful endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 1595–1599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2787-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2787-3

Keywords

Navigation