Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical relevance and prognostic value of radiographic findings in Zenker’s diverticulum

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance and prognostic value of preoperative and postoperative oesophagography in patients with Zenker’s diverticulum. The medical records of 155 patients who underwent surgical treatment (with an endoscopic or transcervical approach) for Zenker’s diverticulum between 1992 and 2010 in a tertiary referral centre were retrospectively evaluated. The size of the diverticula on oesophagography, recognizable muscular septum, and protection of the diverticulum were assessed relative to the surgical procedures performed. The incidence of diverticular remnants on postoperative oesophagography was also assessed relative to the surgical procedure. It was investigated whether the detection of a residual pharyngeal pouch and filling of it with contrast medium were related to the patients’ immediate postoperative symptoms and the development of symptomatic recurrence. Larger diverticula (Brombart III–IV) were manageable significantly more often with endoscopic procedures (P = 0.007). Residual diverticulum and filling with contrast medium were strongly associated with prolonged dysphagia immediately postoperatively (P = 0.005 and P = 0.009, respectively). However, these parameters failed to correlate significantly with a symptomatic recurrence. Preoperative oesophagography proved to be extremely important for surgical planning, with the surgeon’s personal preference seeming to be the driving indicator in many cases. Postoperative oesophagography is only useful for excluding postoperative complications in the immediate postoperative phase and did not have a prognostic value as to a recurrence of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen BC, Baker ME, Falk GW (2009) Role of barium esophagography in evaluating dysphagia. Cleve Clin J Med 76:105–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsikoudas A, Eason D, Kara N, Brunton JN, Mountain RE (2006) Correlation of radiologic findings and clinical outcome in pharyngeal pouch stapling. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:721–726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sydow BD, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (2001) Radiographic findings and complications after surgical or endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticulum in 16 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(5):1067–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brombart M (1953) Zenker’s pharyngo-esophageal diverticulum; pathogenic considerations on radiological studies on 26 cases (23 cases in initial stage). J Belge Radiol 36:166–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zbären PSP, Tschopp L, Becker M, Häusler M (1999) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: transcutaneous diverticulectomy versus microendoscopic myotomy of the cricopharyngeal muscle with CO2 laser. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koch M, Mantsopoulos K, Velegrakis S, Iro H, Zenk J (2011) Endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy versus open surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 121:2090–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keck TRA, Grün PM (2010) Surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticulum (Zenker’s diverticulum). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:587–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Visosky AMPR, Donovan DT (2008) Endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum: factors predictive of success or failure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117:531–537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mantsopoulos K, Psychogios G, Künzel J, Zenk J, Iro H, Koch M (2012) Evaluation of the different transcervical approaches for Zenker diverticulum. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146:725–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CWBB, Netterville JL, Courey MS, Garrett CG, Bayles SW (2004) Carbon dioxide laser endoscopic diverticulotomy versus open diverticulectomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 114:519–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaramillo MJ, McLay KA, McAteer D (2001) Long-term clinico-radiological assessment of endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch: a series of cases. J Laryngol Otol 115:462–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekberg O, Besjakov J, Lindgren S (1987) Radiographic findings after cricopharyngeal myotomy. Acta Radiol 28:555–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Witterick IJ, Gullane PJ, Yeung E (1995) Outcome analysis of Zenker’s diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy. Head Neck 17:382–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadley JM, Ridley N, Djazaeri B, Glover G (1997) The radiological appearances after the endoscopic crico-pharyngeal myotomy: Dohlman’s procedure. Clin Radiol 52:613–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ong CC, Elton PG, Mitchell D (1999) Pharyngeal pouch endoscopic stapling—are post-operative barium swallow radiographs of any value? J Laryngol Otol 113:233–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Overbeek JJ (1994) Meditation on the pathogenesis of hypopharyngeal (Zenker’s) diverticulum and a report of endoscopic treatment in 545 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:178–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Mantsopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mantsopoulos, K., Psychogios, G., Karatzanis, A. et al. Clinical relevance and prognostic value of radiographic findings in Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 583–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2562-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2562-5

Keywords

Navigation