Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Wexham Criteria: defining severe epistaxis to select patients requiring sphenopalatine artery ligation

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to provide guidance regarding patient selection and timing of intervention with sphenopalatine artery (SPA) ligation by defining ‘severe epistaxis’. An analysis of all patients undergoing SPA ligation (January 2002–2010) was performed. SPA ligation was deemed necessary if at least one of the four identified criteria was fulfilled. The same analysis was also performed on all patients admitted with epistaxis who did not undergo SPA ligation over a 6-month period. All 27 patients who underwent SPA ligation met at least one of the criteria selected. Uncontrolled epistaxis (21/27) was fulfilled most often. In comparison, only 4/71 patients admitted with epistaxis who did not undergo SPA ligation fulfilled any single criterion. All criteria were satisfied in a significantly higher number of cases in the SPA group (p < 0.001) The criteria studied proved helpful in identifying patients admitted to hospital with epistaxis who had failed conservative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker TW, Macfarlane TV, McGarry GW (2007) The epidemiology and chronobiology of epistaxis: an investigation of Scottish hospital admissions 1995–2004. Clin Otolaryngol 32(5):361–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rourke T, Tassone P, Philpott C, Bath A (2009) ENT cases seen at a local ‘walk-in centre’: a 1 year review. J Laryngol Otol 123(3):339–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petruson B, Rudin R (1975) The frequency of epistaxis in a male population sample. Rhinology 13:129–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pope LE, Hobbs CG (2005) Epistaxis: an update on current management. Postgrad Med J 81(955):309–314 Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Viducich RA, Blanda MP, Gerson LW (1995) Posterior epistaxis: clinical features and acute complications. Ann Emerg Med 25:592–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan LK, Calhoun KH (1999) Epistaxis. Med Clin North Am 83:43–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wurtle P (1996) How I do it: emergency nasal packing using an umbilical cord clamp to secure a Foley catheter for posterior epistaxis. J Otolaryngol 25:46–47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ho EC, Mansell NJ (2004) How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29:754–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Viehweg TL, Roberson JB, Hudson JW (2006) Epistaxis: diagnosis and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(3):511–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas R, Wormold PJ (2007) Update on epistaxis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15(3):180–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nouraei SA, Maani T, Hajioff D, Saleh HA, Mackay IS (2007) Outcome of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery occlusion for intractable epistaxis: a 10-year experience. Laryngoscope 117(8):1452–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feusi B, Holzmann D (2005) Steurer posterior epistaxis: systematic review on the effectiveness of surgical therapies. J Rhinology 43(4):300–304

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar S, Shetty A, Rockey J, Nilssen E (2003) Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28(4):360–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Flynn PE, Shadaba A (2000) Management of posterior epistaxis by endoscopic clipping of the sphenopalatine artery. Clin Otolaryngol 25:374–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simmen DB, Raghavan U, Briner HR, Manestar M, Groscurth P, Jones NS (2006) The anatomy of the sphenopalatine artery for the endoscopic sinus surgeon. Am J Rhinol 20(5):502–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gifford TO, Orlandi RR (2008) Epistaxis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 41(3):525–536 viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlosser RJ (2009) Clinical practice. Epistaxis. N Engl J Med 360(8):784–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Almeyda R, Shahzad A, Bleach N (2007) Silicone Foley catheters outperform latex Foley catheters for post nasal packing: an in vitro study. Clin Otolaryngol 32(6):480–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Asanau A, Timoshenko AP, Vercherin P, Martin C, Prades JM (2009) Sphenopalatine and anterior ethmoidal artery ligation for severe epistaxis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(9):639–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Budrovich R, Saetti R (1992) Microscopic and endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery. Laryngoscope 1002:1390–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Snyderman CH, Goldman SA, Carrau RL, Ferguson BJ, Grandis JR (1999) Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation is an effective method of treatment for posterior epistaxis. Am J Rhinol 13(2):137–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seno S, Arikata M, Sakurai H, Owaki S, Fukui J, Suzuki M, Shimizu T (2009) Endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery and the maxillary artery for the treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(2):197–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wormold PJ, Wee DT, van Hasselt CA (2000) Endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery for refractory posterior epistaxis. Am J Rhinol 14(4):261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holzmann D, Kaufmann T, Pedrini P, Valavanis A (2003) Posterior epistaxis: endonasal exposure and occlusion of the branches of the sphenopalatine artery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260(8):425–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loughran S, Hilmi O, McGarry GW (2005) Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation—when, why and how to do it. An on-line video tutorial. Clin Otolaryngol 30(6):539–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas D, Rafferty A, Jassar P (2009) Night emergency cover for ENT in England: a national survey. J Laryngol Otol 123(8):899–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdelkader M, Leong SC, White PS (2007) Endoscopic control of the sphenopalatine artery for epistaxis: long-term results. J Laryngol Otol 121(8):759–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, SL2 4HL, UK

    Raj Lakhani, Irfan Syed, Ali Qureishi & Nigel Bleach

Authors
  1. Raj Lakhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irfan Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Qureishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nigel Bleach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Lakhani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakhani, R., Syed, I., Qureishi, A. et al. The Wexham Criteria: defining severe epistaxis to select patients requiring sphenopalatine artery ligation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 2039–2043 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2318-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2318-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation