Skip to main content
Log in

Head and neck squamous cell cancers: need for an organised time-bound surveillance plan

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal care of patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) involves a pre-determined period of post-treatment follow-up for the detection of recurrent or persistent disease, metastases and second primaries at the earliest opportunity. There is little evidence in literature as to whether the surveillance schemes should be based on patient survival, quality of life or cost-adjusted parameters. This article aims at highlighting some of the issues pertinent to the optimization of surveillance strategies in HNSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ridge JA (1993) Squamous cancer of the head and neck: surgical treatment of local and regional recurrence. Semin Oncol 20:419–429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeVisscher AVM, Manni JJ (1994) Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:934–939

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loree TR (1997) Head and neck carcinoma: counterpoint. In: Johnson FE, Virgo KS (eds) Cancer patient follow-up. Mosby–Year Book Inc, St. Louis, p 72.13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coniglio JU, Netterville JL (1993) Guidelines for patient management. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Pillsbury HC, Kohut RI, Tardy ME Jr (eds) Head and neck surgery otolaryngology. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1021–1028

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force (1996) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cancer of the head and neck. The American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, Society of Head and Neck Surgeons, Arlington, VA

  6. British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists (2001) Practice care guidance for clinicians participating in the management of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. Drawn up by a Consensus Group of Practising Clinicians. Eur J Surg Oncol 27(Suppl A):S1–S17

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boysen M, Lövdal O, Tausjö J, Winther F (1992) The value of follow-up in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 28:426–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz DL, Barker J Jr, Chansky K et al (2003) Postradiotherapy surveillance practice for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma–too much or too little? Head Neck 25:990–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson FE, Johnson MH, Clemente MF, Paniello RC, Virgo KS (2006) Geographical variation in surveillance strategies after curative-intent surgery for upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1063–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mukherji SK, Mancuso AA, Kotzur IM et al (1994) Radiologic appearance of the irradiated larynx. Part II. Primary site response. Radiology 193:149–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Meara WP, Thiringer JK, Johnstone PA (2003) Follow-up of head and neck cancer patients post-radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 66:323–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoder H, Yeung HWD, Gonen M et al (2004) Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology 231:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abgral R, Querellou S, Potard G et al (2009) Does 18F-FDG PET/CT improve the detection of posttreatment recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in patients negative for disease on clinical follow-up? J Nucl Med 50:24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haughey BH, Gates GA, Arfken CL, Harvey J (1992) Meta-analysis of second malignant tumors in head and neck cancer: the case for an endoscopic screening protocol. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:105–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cetinayak O, Akman F, Kentli S et al (2008) Assessment of treatment-related thyroid dysfunction in patients with head and neck cancer. Tumori 94:19–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Virgo KS, Paniello RC, Johnson FE (1998) Costs of posttreatment surveillance for patients with upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:564–572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rehan Kazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazi, R., Manikanthan, K., Pathak, K.A. et al. Head and neck squamous cell cancers: need for an organised time-bound surveillance plan. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1969–1971 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1377-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1377-x

Keywords

Navigation