Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pharyngocutaneous fistulae following total laryngectomy comparison between manual and mechanical sutures

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extension of the surgery and closure type of the pharynx can be the determinants in the pharyngocutaneous fistula development. The objective of the study is to evaluate the incidence of pharingocutaneous salivary fistulae after total laryngectomies comparing manual and mechanical sutures. The study is designed as non-randomized, prospective clinical study. Sixty patients with squamous cell carcinoma were submitted to total laryngectomies. In 30 cases, the linear stapler (75 mm) closure (surgical technique described in details) and in other 30 cases manual suture was used. The cases of mechanical suture were prospective and consecutive and the cases of manual suture were a review series of patients who underwent a manual suture of pharynx, in the same period of time. The statistical analysis between the two groups concluded that both were comparable. Fistulae incidence was 6.7% (2/30) in the group with the mechanical suture and 36.7% (11/30) in the group with manual suture closure, presenting a significant difference (p = 0.0047). The total laryngectomy with mechanical closure is an easy and fast learning technique, allowing watertight closure of the pharynx with a low risk of contamination of the surgical field. It is an assured method, even in previously irradiated patients, since we respect the limits of its indication regarding the extension of primary tumor that must be confirmed by previous suspension laryngectomy performed in the operating room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mäkitie AA, Irish J, Gullane PJ (2003) Pharyngocutaneous fistula. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 11:78–84. doi:10.1097/00020840-200304000-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCombe AW, Jones AS (1993) Radiotherapy and complications of laryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol 107:130–132. doi:10.1017/S0022215100122406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Shara AR et al (2004) Pharyngocutaneous fistula following laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 124:117–120. doi:10.1080/00016480310015191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman M, Venkatesan TK, Yakolev A et al (1999) Early detection and treatment of postoperative pharungocutaneous fistula. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:378–380. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70224-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Virtaniemi JA, Kumpulainen EJ, Hirvikoski PP et al (2001) The incidence and etiology of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulae. Head Neck 23:29–33. doi:10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1<29::AID-HED5>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavalot AL, Gervasio CF, Nazionale G et al (2000) Pharyngocutaneous fistula as a complication of total laryngectomy: review of the literature and analysis of case records. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:587–592. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.110617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen LV, Overgaard J, Elbrond O (1988) Pharyngo-cutaneous fistulae after laryngectomy: influence of previous radiotherapy and prophylactic metronidazole. Cancer 61:673–678. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<673::AID-CNCR2820610410>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Natvig K, Boysen M, Tausjo J (1993) Fistulae following laryngectomy in patients treated with irradiation. J Laryngol Otol 107:1136–1139. doi:10.1017/S0022215100125484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hier M, Black MJ, Lafond G (1993) Pharyngocutaneous fistulas after total laryngectomy: incidence, etiology and outcome analysis. J Otolaryngol 22:164–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teknos TN, Myers LL, Bradford CR et al (2001) Free tissue reconstruction of the hypopharynx after organ preservation therapy: analysis of wound complications. Laryngoscope 111:1192–1196. doi:10.1097/00005537-200107000-00011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sofferman AR, Voronetsky I (2000) Use of the linear stapler for pharyngoesofageal closure after total laringectomy. Laryngoscope 110:1406–1409. doi:10.1097/00005537-200008000-00035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soylu L, Kiroglu M, Aydogan B et al (1998) Pharyngocutaneous fistula following laryngectomy. Head Neck 20:22–25. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199801)20:1<22::AID-HED4>3.0.CO;2-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westmore GA, Knowles JEA (1983) The use of a stapling instrument for post-laryngectomy pharyngeal repair. J Laryngol Otol 97:775–778

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agrawal A, Schuller DE (2000) Closed laryngectomy using the automatic linear stapling device. Laryngoscope 110:1402–1405. doi:10.1097/00005537-200008000-00034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Montoya FS, Galarreta JCR, Del Rey AS et al (2002) Comparative study between the use of manual versus mechanical sutures in the closing of the mucous defect following a total laryngectomy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 53:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lukyanchenko AG (1971) Suturing of a laryngeal defect in laryngectomy. Vestn Otorinolaringol 33:29–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bedrin L, Ginsburg G, Horowitz Z et al (2005) 25-year experience of using a linear stapler in laryngectomy. Head Neck 27:1073–1079. doi:10.1002/hed.20280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments to the Head & Neck Services of Heliópolis Hospital (São Paulo city), Ana Costa Hospital (Santos city) and Luís Camargo da Fonseca e Silva Hospital (Cubatão city).

Conflict of interest statement

The Ethicon division of Johnson & Johnson gives us 10 Staplers–ILC-40–for use in the mechanical sutures in Santa Casa Medical School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Head and Neck Division, Department of Surgery, Santa Casa Medical School, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr,112, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP, CEP:01221-900, Brazil

    Antonio José Gonçalves, J. A. L. de Souza Jr, M. B. Menezes, N. K. Kavabata & A. B. Suehara

  2. Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    C. N. Lehn

Authors
  1. Antonio José Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. L. de Souza Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. B. Menezes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. K. Kavabata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. B. Suehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. N. Lehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio José Gonçalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonçalves, A.J., de Souza, J.A.L., Menezes, M.B. et al. Pharyngocutaneous fistulae following total laryngectomy comparison between manual and mechanical sutures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 1793–1798 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0945-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0945-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation