Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable forces are exerted on oropharyngeal tissues during microlaryngoscopic procedures. Although it is generally accepted that positioning of the patient’s head influences the quantity of these forces and the easiness of the exposure of the anterior glottis, there is a lack of systematic studies on this topic. The aim of our study was to measure the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy in different positions. This should result in a recommendation for a “low-pressure” position which minimises the risk of postoperative complications due to tissue trauma. Thirty consecutive patients planned for microlaryngoscopy underwent study procedures. During general anaesthesia, measurements were taken using a tension spring balance in neutral position, during extension of the cervical spine, as well as under moderate and maximum flexion. Elevation of the patient’s head thus flexing the cervical spine reduced the occurring forces significantly. Maximum elevation allowed a full exposure of the anterior commissure in all cases, whereas exposure of the anterior commissure was not possible even with maximum external counterpressure in almost 40% of cases with maximum extended cervical spine. The largest differences were observed between extension, neutral and flexion position, whereas the differences between moderate and maximum flexion were not significant. Elevation of the patient’s head with consecutive flexion of the cervical spine allows for better exposure in microlaryngoscopy and reduces significantly the pressure exerted on the oropharyngeal tissues thus minimising the risk of tissue injury. A slight modification of standard instruments can be necessary when using this “low-pressure” position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Condado MA, Morais D, Santos J et al (1994) Hypoglossal nerve paralysis after intubation and direct laryngoscopy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 45:477–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Drezner DA (1995) Complications of direct laryngoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:630–631. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70232-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gugatschka M, Gerstenberger C, Friedrich G (2008) Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:1083–1087. doi:10.1007/s00405-008-0586-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heiden C, Westhues M, Kornmesser HJ (1976) Sideeffects and complications following suspension laryngoscopy (article in Germany). Laryngorhinootologie 55:299–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hendrix RA, Ferouz A, Bacon CK (1994) Admission planning and complications of direct laryngoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 110:510–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochman I, Zeitels SM, Heaton JT (1999) Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:715–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinsasser O (1976) Mikrolaryngoskopie und endolaryngeale Mikrochirurgie. Technik und typische Befunde, 2nd edn. Auflage Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klussmann JP, Knoedgen R, Damm M, Wittekindt C, Eckel HE (2002) Complications of suspension laryngoscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111(11):972–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller A, Verges L, Schleier P, Wohlfarth M, Gottschall R (2002) The incidence of microlaryngoscopy associated complications (article in German). HNO 50(12):1057–1061. doi:10.1007/s00106-002-0640-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen CA, Filho PA, Scheffel L, Buckmire R (2005) Oropharyngeal complications of suspension laryngoscopy: a prospective study. Laryngoscope 115:1681–1684. doi:10.1097/01.MLG.0000175538.89627.0D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaughan CW (1993) Vocal fold exposure in phonosurgery. J Voice 7:189–194. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80350-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeitels SM, Vaughan CW (1994) External counterpressure and internal distension for optimal laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottal commissure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:669–675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Friedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedrich, G., Gugatschka, M. Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 999–1003 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0913-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0913-z

Keywords

Navigation