Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-cadherin but not β-catenin expression is decreased in laryngeal biopsies from patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abnormal exposure of acid refluxate on the esophageal mucosa has been shown to decrease the epithelial barrier function through an alteration in the intercellular junctional complex. However, only few studies have examined the molecular effects caused by abnormal exposure of gastric refluxate on the laryngeal epithelium. E-cadherin and β-catenin are cell membrane-associated proteins playing a major role in the maintenance of cell–cell adhesion in epithelial tissues. In this study we tried to analyse the molecular effect of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the cellular expression of these proteins. Therefore, we compared the expression of E-caherin and β-catenin in laryngeal biopsies from patients with and without pH-documented laryngopharyngeal reflux. Paraffin-embedded archival laryngeal biopsies taken from 21 patients, who had undergone rigid laryngoscopy under general anaesthesia and postoperative 24-h pH monitoring, were evaluated immunohistochemically with antibodies to E-cadherin and β-catenin. The membrane expression of the two proteins was categorized in no expression, mild, moderate and strong (grade 0–3). In LPR patients (n = 14) the mean grade of E-cadherin and β-catenin expression was 1.57 and 1.21, while in specimens of patients without pH-documented LPR it was 2.57 and 1.29. The difference in E-cadherin expression was statistically significant (P = 0.011). From our findings we conclude that LPR can cause a decrease in the laryngeal expression of E-cadherin but not of β-catenin. The reduction of E-cadherin-mediated adhesion could contribute to the development of laryngeal neoplasms. E-cadherin immunostaining of laryngeal biopsies could be a further diagnostic tool to confirm the diagnosis in patients with suspected LPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koufman JA, Wiener GJ, Wu WC, Castell DO (1988) Reflux laryngitis and ist sequelae: the diagnostic role of ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. J Voice 2:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koufman JA (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux 2002: a new paradigm of airway disease. Ear Nose Throat J 81:2–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tobey NA, Hosseini SS, Caymaz-Bor C, Wyatt HR, Orlando GS, Orlando RC (2001) The role of pepsin in acid injury to esophageal epithelium. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3062–3070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston N, Bulmer D, Gill GA, Panetti M, Ross PE, Pearson JP, Pignatelli M, Axford SE, Dettmar PW, Koufman JA (2003) Cell biology of laryngeal epithelial defenses in health and disease: further studies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:481–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill GA, Buda A, Moorghen M, Dettmar PW, Pignatelli M (2005) Characterisation of adherens and tight junctional molecules in normal animal larynx; determining a suitable model for studying molecular abnormalities in human laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Clin Pathol 58:1265–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Myong NH (2004) Reduced expression of E-cadherin in human non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 36:56–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent DA Jr, Garrett D, Radionoff SL, Reussner LA, Stasney CR (2000) The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database. J Voice 14:247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu M, Lawson G, Delos M, Jamart J, Remacle M (1997) Expression of E-cadherin adhesion molecule in vocal cord carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:417–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, Akimoto S, Kato H, Watanabe H, Tachimori Y, Yamamoto S, Hirohashi S (1997) Expression of E-cadherin, α-catenin, β-catenin and plakoglobin in esophageal carcinomas and its prognostic significance: immunohistochemical analysis of 96 lesions. Oncology 112:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbert HE, Mueller W, Schneiders A, Meier S, Moll R, Birchmeier W, Hommel G (1996) Prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in 413 gastric carcinomas. Int J Cancer 69:184–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorudi S, Hanby AM, Poulsom R, Northover J, Hart IR (1995) Level of expression of E-cadherin mRNA in colorectal cancer correlates with clinical outcome. Br J Cancer 71:614–616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ihara A, Koizumi H, Hashizume R, Uchikoshi T (1996) Expression of epithelial cadherin and α- and β-catenin in nontumoral livers and hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatology 23:1441–1447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunji N, Oda T, Todoroki T, Kanazawa N, Kawamoto T, Yuzawa K, Scarpa A, Fukao K (1998) Pancreatic carcinoma: correlation between E-cadherin and α-catenin expression status and liver metastasis. Cancer 82:1649–1656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng L, Nagabhushan M, Pretlow TP, Amini SB, Pretlow TG (1996) Expression of E-cadherin in primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Pathol 148:1375–1380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mattjissen V, Peters HM, Schalkwijk L, Manni JJ, van’t Hof-Grootenboer B, de Mulder PH, Ruiter DJ (1993) E-cadherin expression in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma is associated with clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 55:580–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schipper JH, Frixen UH, Behrens J, Unger A, Jahnke K, Birchmeier W (1991) E-cadherin expression in squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck: inverse correlation with tumour differentiation and lymph node metastasis. Cancer Res 51:6328–6337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmermann MB, Robinson RA (2006) Decreased E-cadherin but not β-catenin expression is associated with vascular invasion and decreased survival in head and neck squamous carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:142–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanas A, Royo Y, Ortego J, Molina M, Sainz R (1999) Experimental esophagitis induced by acid and pepsin in rabbits mimicking human reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 116:97–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tobey NA, Koves G, Orlando RC (1997) HCl-induced cell edema in primary cultured rabbit esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 112:847–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanas A, Sousa FL, Ortego J, Esteva F, Blas JM, Soria J, Sainz R (1995) Aspirin renders the oesophageal mucosa more permeable to acid and pepsin. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1065–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Hao T, Wu R (1999) Effect of cigarette smoke extract on E-cadherin expression of airway epithelial cells. Zhongua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 22:414–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu S, Wu R, Chen C (1999) The study of E-cadherin expression on injury and repair of epithelium of respiratory tract in smoking mice. Zhongua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 22:417–419

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Garvin J, Joyce M, Tobbia I, O’Grady L, Waldron R (2005) Smoking, helicobacter pylori infection and epithelial cadherin expression in gastric mucosa. Endoscopy 37. doi:10.1055/s-2005-868534

  24. Ramroth H, Dietz A, Becher H (2004) Interaction effects and population-attributable risks for smoking and alcohol on laryngeal cancer and its subsites. A case-control study from Germany. Methods Inf Med 43:499–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozlugedik S, Yorulmaz I, Gokcan K (2006) Is laryngopharyngeal reflux an important risk factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaezi MF, Sepi M, Quadeer MA, Lopez R, Colabianchi N (2006) Laryngeal cancer and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a case-control study. Am J Med 119:768–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takeichi M (1993) Cadherins and cancer: implications for invasion and metastasis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 5:806–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2001) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 111:1313–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16:274–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reichel O, Keller J, Rasp G, Hagedorn H, Berghaus A (2007) Efficacy of once-daily esomeprazole treatment in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux evaluated by 24-hour pH monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchionini-Straße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    Oliver Reichel, Florian Durst & Alexander Berghaus

  2. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany

    Doris Mayr

Authors
  1. Oliver Reichel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doris Mayr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florian Durst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexander Berghaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Reichel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reichel, O., Mayr, D., Durst, F. et al. E-cadherin but not β-catenin expression is decreased in laryngeal biopsies from patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265, 937–942 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0568-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0568-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation