Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of different closure materials on pharyngeal wound healing: an experimental animal study

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of pharyngo-cutaneous fistula (PCF) is controversial and various predisposing factors have been proposed. This study aimed to compare different suture materials in the closure of pharyngeal wounds in experimental animals. Fifty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups. Artificial pharyngotomy was performed and was then repaired with Vicryl, polypropylene, and Vicryl plus fibrin glue, respectively. Outcome measurements included gross wound inspection and histological examination. There was a significant difference in the rates of PCF formation between group I and group II (Fisher’s exact test, = 0.046). In addition, minimal inflammatory response was found in the polypropylene group when compared to the other groups. The fibrin glue-treated group had the highest fibroblast activity and collagen deposition. Polypropylene produced minimal tissue reaction, which facilitated the healing process. Therefore, proper selection of suture material can probably reduce the rate of PCF but should not be substituted for proper aseptic and meticulous surgical techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soylu L, Kiroglu M, Aydogan B et al (1998) Pharyngocutaneous fistula following laryngectomy. Head Neck 20:22–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Redaelli de Zinis LO, Ferrari L, Tomenzoli D, Premoli G, Parrinello G, Nicolai P (1999) Postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula: incidence, predisposing factors, and therapy. Head Neck 21:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qureshi SS, Chaturvedi P, Pai PS et al (2005) A prospective study of pharyngocutaneous fistulas following total laryngectomy. J Can Res Ther 1:51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarkar S, Mehta SA, Tiwari J, Mehta AR, Mehta MS (1990) Complications following surgery for cancer of the larynx and pyriform fossa. J Surg Oncol 43:245–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Man DW, Tang MY, Li AK (1998) End-to-end oesophageal anastomosis: an experimental study in the rat. Aust N Z J Surg 58:975–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyons MB, Lyons GD, Webster D, Wheeler VR (1989) Adhesives in larynx repair. Laryngoscope 99:376–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthews TW, Briant TD (1991) The use of fibrin tissue glue in thyroid surgery: resource utilization implications. J Otolaryngol 20:276–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Philips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW, Zeng H, Dindar H (1992) Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin A on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 163:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanellos I, Odisseos C, Kazantizidou D, Galovatsea K, Zaraboukas T, Dadoukis I (1998) Effects of early vs. delayed postoperative injection of 5-fluorouracil plus interferon alpha on colonic healing. Eur Surg Res 30:414–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turan M, Saraydyn SU, Bulut HE et al (2004) Do vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor promote phenytoin’s wound healing effect in rats: an immunohistochemical and histopathologic study. Dermatol Surg 20:1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer AJ, Clark RA (1999) Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 341:738–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Melo GM, Ribeiro KC, Kowalski LP, Deheinzelin D (2001) Risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer and their prognostic implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:828–833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zabrodsky M, Calabrese L, Tosoni A et al (2004) Major surgery in elderly head and neck cancer patients: immediate and long-term surgical results and complication rates. Surg Oncol 13:249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhys-Evans PH (1989) Complications in head and neck surgery and how to avoid trouble. J Laryngol Otol 103:926–929

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grandis JR, Vickers RM, Rihs JD et al (1994) The efficacy of topical antibiotic prophylaxis for contaminated head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 104:719–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balbuena L, Stambaugh KI, Ramirez SG, Yeager C (1998) Effects of topical oral antiseptic rinses on bacterial counts of saliva in healthy human subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:625–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW (1992) A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:785–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beauchamp PJ, Guzick DS, Held B, Schmidt WA (1988) Histologic response to microsuture materials. J Reprod Med 33:615–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olutoye OO, Zhu X, Cass DL, Smith CW (2005) Neutrophil recruitment by fetal porcine endothelial cells: implications in scarless fetal wound healing. Pediatr Res 58:1290–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ueno M, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM et al (2005) Accelerated wound healing of alkali-burned corneas in MRL mice is associated with a reduced inflammatory signature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4097–4106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H et al (2004) Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil. Dis Colon Rectum 47:510–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss LS, Miller RH, Bates ML, Fisher E, Weiner N, Shepard D (1993) An animal model for pharyngocutaneous fistulas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:738–742

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH-947002A) Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China. No potential conflict of interest was involved in this research. The authors thank Ms. Hui-Ching Ho for statistical consulting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung-Tsung Chiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, SA., Tung, KC., Cheng, CC. et al. The impact of different closure materials on pharyngeal wound healing: an experimental animal study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265, 227–231 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0431-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0431-9

Keywords

Navigation