Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between PET and PET/CT in recurrent head and neck cancer and clinical implications

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy between positron emission tomography (PET) and combined PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to evaluate the degree of interobserver agreement. Thirty-two patients who had undergone curative treatment for HNSCC and who presented with a suspicion of recurrent local disease were studied with fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-PET imaging. All patients had undergone an inconclusive conventional workup (nasofibroscopy, CT scan and/or MRI). PET and PET/CT were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians independently. Performances of PET and PET/CT were compared using biopsy and/or clinical follow-up of at least 8 months as gold-standard. ROC curves were employed for statistical analysis. Out of 32 patients, 18 (56%) had a local recurrence. Intraclass correlation coefficients were strong (>90) and statistically significant (P < 0.0001) for the two reviewers in all cases. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET were found to be 94%, between 36 and 50% and between 69 and 75%, respectively, depending on the consideration of equivocal cases. Results for PET/CT were found to be 94, 57 and 78%. The utility scores of PET and PET/CT were 0.72 and 0.78, respectively. PET/CT could have a direct impact on patient care with the avoidance of 8/14 (57%) unnecessary invasive procedures (panendoscopy under general anaesthesia). Combined PET/CT is more accurate than PET alone for detection of recurrent HNSCC. The findings of this study are reinforced by the strong interobserver agreement in the interpretation of the results

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berlangieri SU, Brizel DM, Scher RL, Schifter T, Hawk TC, Hamblen S, Coleman RE, Hoffman JM (1994) Pilot study of positron emission tomography in patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Head Neck 16:340–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, Jerin J, Young J, Byars L, Nutt R (2000) A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41:1369–1379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Branstetter BF 4th, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, Meltzer CC (2005) Head and neck malignancy : is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone ? Radiology 235:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer J, Bodar EJ, De Bree R, Langendijk JA, Castelijns JA, Hoekstra OS, Leemans CR (2004) Detecting recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: room for improvement. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:417–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohade C, Osman M, Pannu HK, Wahl RL (2003) Uptake in supraclavicular area fat (“USA-fat”): description on 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 44:170–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farber LA, Benard F, Machtay M, Smith RJ, Weber RS, Weinstein GS, Chalian AA, Alavi A, Rosenthal DI (1999) Detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after radiation therapy with 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Laryngoscope 109:970–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukui MB, Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC (2003) PET/CT imaging in recurrent head and neck cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 24(2):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodwin WJ (2000) Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means? Laryngoscope 110(Suppl 93):1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gussack GS, Hudgin PA (1991) Imaging modalities in recurrent head and neck tumors. Laryngoscope 101:119–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutzeit A, Antoch G, Kuhl H, Egelhof T, Fischer M, Hauth E, Goehde S, Bockisch A, Debatin J, Freudenberg L (2005) Unknown primary tumors: detection with dual-modality PET/CT-initial experience. Radiology 234(1):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keyes JW Jr (1995) SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 36:1836–1839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunkel M, Forster GJ, Reichert TE, Jeong JH, Benz P, Bartenstein P, Wagner W, Whiteside TL (2003) Detection of recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma by [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer 98:2257–2265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonneux M, Lawson G, Ide C, Bausart R, Remacle M, Pauwels S (2000) Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient. Laryngoscope 110:1493–1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuirt WF, Greven KM, Keyes JW Jr, Williams DW 3rd, Watson N (1998) Laryngeal radionecrosis versus recurrent cancer: a clinical approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 107:293–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamoto Y, Tatsumi M, Hammoud D, Cohade C, Osman MM, Wahl RL (2005) Normal FDG distribution patterns in the head and neck: PET/CT evaluation. Radiology 234(3):879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoder H, Yeung HW, Gonen M, Kraus D, Larson SM (2004) Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology 231(1):65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smit M, Balm AJ, Hilgers FJ, Tan IB (2001) Pain as a sign of recurrent disease in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 23:372–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokkel MP, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ, van Rijk PP (1999) The detection of local recurrent head and neck cancer with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 26:767–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Syed R, Bomanji JB, Nagabhushan N, Hughes S, Kayani I, Groves A, Gacinovic S, Hydes N, Visvikis D, Copland C, Ell PJ (2005) Impact of combined 18F-FDG PET/CT in head and neck tumors. Br J Cancer 92(6):1046–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Terhaard CH, Bongers V, van Rijk PP, Hordijk GJ (2001) F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron-emission tomography scanning in detection of local recurrence after radiotherapy for laryngeal/pharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 23:933–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, Hong WK (1993) Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 328:184–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schoder H, Patel SG, Gonen M, Wolden S, Pfister DG, Shah JP, Larson SM, Kraus DH (2002) Diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:4199–4208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmer LA, Snyderman C, Fukui MB, Blodgett T, McCook B, Townsend DW, Meltzer CC (2005) The use of combined PET/CT for localizing recurrent head and neck cancer: the Pittsburgh experience. Ear Nose Throat J 84(2):104–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Dr U McCarthy for helpful discussions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Fakhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fakhry, N., Lussato, D., Jacob, T. et al. Comparison between PET and PET/CT in recurrent head and neck cancer and clinical implications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 531–538 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0225-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0225-5

Keywords

Navigation