Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of voice complaints and risk factors for voice complaints in female student teachers and practicing teachers early in their career

  • Phoniatrics
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed to compare female student teachers (454 subjects; 1st to 4th year of training) and practicing teachers (82 female teachers; 1st to 4th year of teaching career) of primary education early in their career, with regard to risk factors perceived to be a negative influence on the voice, and the relative risk of the given risk factors for voice complaints. This enables the observation of whether there is a sudden increase or difference in the perceived risk factors after starting a professional teaching career. Additionally, the existence of a history of voice problems during training was questioned among the teachers. Teachers with voice complaints compared to teachers without voice complaints reported a history of voice complaints during their training (P =0.013). Teachers compared to student teachers reported more voice complaints at the moment and/or during the past year (P =0.002). The following data were obtained from student teachers and teachers reporting voice complaints. Only around a third of the subjects of both groups sought voice care (P =0.286–0.893). Risk factors were estimated in relation to voice complaints. Student teachers reported less frequently than teachers that stress (P =0.014), work pressure (P =0.003) and the composition of the class (P =0.013) have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers reported less frequently than teachers that the number of people they communicate with (P <0.001) and the deterioration of their general physical condition (P =0.010) have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers reported more frequently than teachers that environmental irritants (P <0.001) and humidity (P =0.020) of the classroom have a negative influence on their voice. Student teachers more than teachers were of the opinion that the attention paid to the voice during their training was sufficient (P <0.001). To test whether professional status (student teacher versus teacher) is an effect modifier for the risk factors, odds ratios (OR) were compared between the group of teachers and of student teachers (total group with and without voice complaints) to search for interactions between the risk factors and professional status. There is a significant difference in the pattern of risk factors for student teachers and teachers (P =0.010). There is an indication that vocal loading factors and environmental factors are more influential in student teachers and that there is a tendency for psycho-emotional factors to be more influential for teachers early in their career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Titze IR, Lemke JH, Montequin D (1997) Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report. J Voice 11:254–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verdolini K, Ramig LO (2001) Review: occupational risks for voice problems. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 26:37–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell A, Oates J, Greenwood KM (1998) Prevalence of voice problems in teachers. J Voice 12:467–479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy N, Merril RM, Thibeault S, Parsa AR, Gray SD, Smith EM (2004) Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47:281–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith E, Lemke J, Taylor M, Kirchner L, Hoffman H (1998) Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. J Voice 12:480–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sala E, Laine A, Simberg S, Pentti J, Suonpaa J (2001) The prevalence of voice disorders among day care centre teachers compared with nurses: A questionnaire and clinical study. J Voice 15:413–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy N, Gray SD, Simon M, Dove H, Corbin-Lewis K, Stemple JC (2001) An evaluation of the effects of two treatment approaches for teachers with voice disorders: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:286–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotaas C, Starr CD (1993) Vocal fatigue among teachers. Folia Phoniatr 45:120–129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sapir S (1993) Vocal attrition in voice students: survey findings. J Voice 7:69–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rantala L, Määtä T, Vilkman E (1997) Measuring voice under teachers’ working circumstances: F0 and perturbation features in maximally sustained phonation. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 49:281–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sataloff RT (2001) Professional voice users: the evaluation of voice disorders. Occup Med 16:633–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wellens WAR, Van Opstal MJMC (2001) Performance stress in professional voice users. In: Dejonckere PH (ed) Occupational voice: care and cure. Kugler, The Hague, pp 81–100

  13. Simberg S, Laine A, Sala E, Ronnemaa AM (2000) Prevalence of voice disorders among future teachers. J Voice 14:231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pekkarinen E, Himberg L, Pentti J (1992) Prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers compared with nurses—a questionnaire study. Scand J Logoped Phoniatr 17:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith E, Gray SD, Dove H, Kirchner L, Heras H (1997) Frequency and effects of teachers voice problems. J Voice 11:81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattiske JA, Oates JM, Greenwood KM (1998) Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment. J Voice 12:489–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morton V, Watson DR (2001) The impact of impaired vocal quality on children’s ability to process spoken language. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 26:17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dejonckere PH (2001) Gender differences in the prevalence of occupational voice disorders. In: Dejonckere PH (ed) Occupational voice: care and cure. Kugler, The Hague, pp 11–20

  19. Timmermans B, De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Boudewijns A, Clement G, Peeters A, Van de Heyning PH (2002) Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users. J Voice 16:372–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yiu EML (2002) Impact and prevention of voice problems in the teaching profession: embracing the consumers view. J Voice 16:215–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morton V, Watson DR (1998) The teaching voice: problems and perceptions. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 23:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilkman E (1996) Occupational risk factors and voice disorders. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 21:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jong FICRS de, Kooijman PGC, Orr R (2001) Predictive parameters in occupational dysphonia. Myth or reality? In: Dejonckere PH (ed) Occupational voice: care and cure. Kugler, The Hague, pp 101–112

  24. Vilkman E (2000) Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 52:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sapienza CM, Crandell CC, Curtis B (1999) Effects of sound-field frequency modulation amplification on reducing teachers’ sound pressure level in the classroom. J Voice 13:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Södersten M, Granqvist S, Hammarberg B, Szabo A (2002) Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for pre-school teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings. J Voice 16:356–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M (2002) Extrinsic laryngeal muscle tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice 16:33–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morrison, MD, Rammage LA (1993) Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Otolaryngol 113:428–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Jong FICRS, Cornelis BE, Wuyts FL, Kooijman PGC, Schutte HK, Oudes MJ, Graamans K (2003) A psychological cascade model for persisting voice problems in teachers. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 55:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hemler RJ, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH (1997) The effect of relative humidity of inhaled air on acoustic parameters of voice in normal subjects. J Voice 11:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. I. C. R. S. de Jong.

Appendix

Appendix

The questionnaires were introduced as follows: We would be grateful if you could fill in the attached four pages as soon as possible, preferably within 2 days. Depending on the type of question, you are asked to circle, cross or fill in the answer. Your response is only valid if the space between boxes is left clear, and if only one box per question is filled in. Completing the questionnaire requires about 10 min. The processing of the data is of course completely anonymous, and you are not required to put your name on the forms. Tables 1 and 2 show the questions provided with the questionnaires.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, G., Kooijman, P.G.C., Cremers, C.W.R.J. et al. A comparative study of voice complaints and risk factors for voice complaints in female student teachers and practicing teachers early in their career. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263, 370–380 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-1010-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-1010-6

Keywords

Navigation