Skip to main content
Log in

Morbid obesity and outcome of ectopic pregnancy following capped single-dose regimen methotrexate

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluate whether morbid obesity influenced resolution, number of doses or ultimately surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) when treated with single-dose regimen methotrexate (SDR-MTX) capped at 100 mg.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of TEP who underwent MTX treatment from 2000 to 2013. Patients were excluded if initial β–hCG <1000 mIU/mL, did not have β–hCG follow-up or were not treated with SDR-MTX. Per protocol, dose was administered at 50 mg/m2 with a capped maximum of 100 mg. Patients were divided based on their BMI (<40 and ≥40 kg/m2). Demographic variables, β–hCG before treatment, maximum diameter of ectopic size, embryonic heart tones, decrease of β–hCG, need for additional MTX doses and surgery despite treatment were recorded and compared among the groups.

Results

151 women were included in the study, 89.4% (135/151) non-morbidly obese and 10.6% (16/151) morbidly obese. No differences in age distribution, ethnicity, pre-treatment presence of embryonic heart tones, maximum diameter of ectopic size ≥35 mm and β–hCG ≥5000 mIU/ml were found. Following treatment, the proportion of patients with at least an 80% decrease in their β–hCG levels or need for surgery were similar, however, morbidly obese patients were significantly more likely [11/134 vs. 5/16, OR 5.1 (1.5–17.3, p = 0.015)] to require an additional MTX dose.

Conclusion

Among patients with TEP, morbidly obese patients were five times more likely to require an additional dose compared to non-morbidly obese when SDR-MTX capped at 100 mg was used for medical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, Syverson CJ (2003) Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance–United States, 1991–1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(2):1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kadar N, Romero R (1982) The timing of a repeat ultrasound examination in the evaluation for ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 10(5):211–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kadar N, Taylor KJ, Rosenfield AT, Romero R (1983) Combined use of serum HCG and sonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141(3):609–615. doi:10.2214/ajr.141.3.609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipscomb GH (2012) Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):424–432. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510a48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gynecologists ACoOa (2008) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 111(6):1479–1485. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817d201e

  6. Morlock RJ, Lafata JE, Eisenstein D (2000) Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 95(3):407–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R, Sammel M (2003) The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing “single dose” and “multidose” regimens. Obstet Gynecol 101(4):778–784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farquhar CM (2005) Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366(9485):583–591. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67103-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnhart KT (2009) Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 361(4):379–387. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0810384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratain MJ (1998) Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? J Clin Oncol 16(7):2297–2298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai MP (2012) Drug dosing based on weight and body surface area: mathematical assumptions and limitations in obese adults. Pharmacotherapy 32(9):856–868. doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01108.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2014) Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 311(8):806–814. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307(5):491–497. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knibbe CA, Brill MJ, van Rongen A, Diepstraten J, van der Graaf PH, Danhof M (2015) Drug disposition in obesity: toward evidence-based dosing. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 55:149–167. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Health GoSA South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines Ectopic Pregnancy. https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/fead0f004ee4554cb7ecbfd150ce4f37/Ectopic-pregnancy-WCHN-PPG-01092008.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=fead0f004ee4554cb7ecbfd150ce4f37. Accessed June 23 2015

  16. Mavrelos DMM, Helmy S, Derdelis G, Jauniaux E (2015) Jurkovic D (2015) β-hCG resolution times during expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancies. BMC Womens Health 15(1):43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mavrelos DNH, Jamil A, Hoo W, Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D (2013) Efficacy and safety of a clinical protocol for expectant management of selected women diagnosed with a tubal ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42(1):102–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Griggs JJ, Mangu PB, Anderson H, Balaban EP, Dignam JJ, Hryniuk WM, Morrison VA, Pini TM, Runowicz CD, Rosner GL, Shayne M, Sparreboom A, Sucheston LE, Lyman GH, Oncology ASoC (2012) Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 30(13):1553–1561. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandhu G, Mapp S, Carrington C, Hennig S (2014) To cap or not to cap: chemotherapy dosing in obese adult hematology patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95(4):356–358. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yalcinkaya TM, Brown SE, Mertz HL, Thomas DW, DePond RT, Heywood ER (2000) A Comparison of 25 mg/m2 Vs 50 mg/m2 Dose of Methotrexate (MTX) for the Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy (EP). J Soc gynecol Invest. 7(1):179A

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis R. Hoyos.

Ethics declarations

No funding as obtained for this study.

Conflict of interest

LR Hoyos declares that he has no conflict of interest. MF Malik declares that she has on conflict of interest. M Najjar declares that he has no conflict of interest. J Rodriguez-Kovacs declares that he has no conflict of interest. M Abdallah declares that he has no conflict of interest. G Vilchez declares that he has no conflict of interest. AO Awonuga declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoyos, L.R., Malik, M., Najjar, M. et al. Morbid obesity and outcome of ectopic pregnancy following capped single-dose regimen methotrexate. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295, 375–381 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4229-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4229-0

Keywords

Navigation