Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between uterine volume and discontinuation of treatment with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices in patients with adenomyosis

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study is to evaluate the relationship between the uterine volume and the failure of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in patients with adenomyosis.

Methods

A total of 171 women with adenomysis were treated with LNG-IUD from November 2009 to December 2011. The amount of menorrhagia, degree of dysmenorrhea, and the uterine volume were compared before and after insertion of LNG-IUD, and the treatment failure of LNG-IUD was observed.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 42.5 years (range 29–53 years). The mean uterine volume was 158 mL (range 46–769 mL). Among the total participants, 37 (21.6 %) discontinued the treatment prematurely. There were no different characteristics between the ongoing treatment group and treatment failure group with LNG-IUD. However, there was significant difference of uterine volume between two groups (178 ± 14 and 141 ± 7 mL, P = 0.010). Based on the receiver operator characteristic analysis, the optimum cutoff value of uterine volume more than 150 mL was significantly associated with failure of LNG-IUD (area under curve: 0.763, 95 % CI 0.669–0.856). In univariate analysis, the uterine volume more than 150 mL was the only independent factor for the failure of LNG-IUD (odds ratio 6.76, 95 % CI 1.20–38.02, P = 0.030).

Conclusion

The rate of treatment failure after LNG-IUD insertion for the patients with adenomyosis was related to the uterine volume. Specifically, the treatment failure rate of large volume uterus (>150 mL) with LNG-IUD was significantly higher than that of small volume uterus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho S, Nam A, Kim H, Chay D, Park K, Cho DJ et al (2008) Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(373):e1–e7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo HJ, Lee MA, Ko YB, Yang JB, Kang BH, Lee KH (2012) The efficacy of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in perimenopausal women with menorrhagia or dysmenorrhea. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Socolov D, Blidaru I, Tamba B, Miron N, Boiculese L, Socolov R (2011) Levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system for the treatment of menorrhagia and/or frequent irregular uterine bleeding associated with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 16:480–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abu Hashim H, Zayed A, Ghayaty E, El Rakhawy M (2013) LNG-IUS treatment of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in perimenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Gynecol Oncol 24:128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaunitz AM, Inki P (2012) The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review. Drugs 72:193–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM et al (2001) Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 16:2427–2433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S (1992) Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 58:94–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Higham JM, O’Brien PM, Shaw RW (1990) Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:734–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon JS, Bird HA (1981) Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 40:87–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bahamondes L, Diaz J, Marchi NM, Petta CA, Cristofoletti ML, Gomez G (1995) Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion. Hum Reprod 10:2917–2918

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merki-Feld GS, Schwarz D, Imthurn B, Keller PJ (2008) Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 137:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivin I, Stern J, Coutinho E, Mattos CE, el Mahgoub S, Diaz S et al (1991) Prolonged intrauterine contraception: a seven-year randomized study of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the Copper T380 Ag IUDS. Contraception 44:473–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis AE, Bret PM (1995) Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 197:609–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heon Jong Yoo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial disclosures to declare and no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval

While preparing this manuscript, we have strictly followed not only the instructions for authors as specified by Archives of Gynecology and obstetrics, but also the guidelines of the Ethic Committee of the Chungnam National University Hospital, Korea and the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chungnam National University Hospital, Korea (2013-08-038). Patient anonymity was completely preserved and the unique nature of identifying patients was not included in this manuscript.

Informed consent

This is retrospective study. Informed consent was not needed to obtain from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K.H., Kim, J.K., Lee, M.A. et al. Relationship between uterine volume and discontinuation of treatment with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices in patients with adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 561–566 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4105-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4105-y

Keywords

Navigation