Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introduction of basic obstetrical ultrasound screening in undergraduate medical education

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Teaching ultrasound procedures to undergraduates has recently been proposed to improve the quality of medical education. We address the impact of applying standardized ultrasound teaching to our undergraduates.

Methods

Medical students received an additional theoretical and practical course involving hands-on ultrasound screening during their mandatory practical training week in obstetrics and gynecology. The students’ theoretical knowledge and fetal image recognition skills were tested before and after the course. After the course, the students were asked to answer a course evaluation questionnaire. To standardize the teaching procedure, we used Peyton’s 4-Step Approach to teach the skills needed for a German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine Level 1 ultrasound examiner.

Results

The multiple-choice question scores after the course showed statistically significant improvement (50 vs. 80 %; P < 0.001). The questionnaire revealed that students were satisfied with the course, felt that it increased their ultrasound knowledge, and indicated that they wanted more sonographic hands-on training in both obstetrics and gynecology and other medical fields.

Conclusion

Using practical, hands-on medical teaching is an emerging method for undergraduate education that should be further evaluated, standardized, and developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurjak A (2000) Ultrasound scanning—Prof. Ian Donald (1910–1987). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 90:187–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell S (2013) A short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 5:213–229

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Levi S (1997) The history of ultrasound in gynecology 1950–1980. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:481–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao VV, Poston MB, Howe DB et al (2011) An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 3:1–12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiebel B, Hartwig HG, Garten A, Mödder U, Hofer M (2000) Innovative course concept for small group teaching in clinical methods: results of a longitudinal, 2-cohort study in the setting of the medical didactic pilot project in Dusseldorf. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Munson J, Szyld D (2015) Blackstock U. Bedside ultrasound curriculum for medical students: report of a blended learning curriculum implementation and validation. J Clin Ultrasound 43:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Holsbeeck L, Musial JL, Parker A et al (2008) A pilot study of comprehensive ultrasound education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine: a pioneer year review. J Ultrasound Med 27:745–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trivedi PN, Melo LC, Freeman ML et al (2008) Ultrasonography in preclinical education: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc 108:601–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carow JB, Ruesseler M, Leu BM et al (2012) Arthroscopy or ultrasound in undergraduate anatomy education: a randomized cross-over controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 12:85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. DEGUM. Mehrstufenkonzept & Zertifizierung. http://www.degum.de/sektionen/radiologie/mehrstufenkonzept-zertifizierung.html

  11. DEGUM. Angebote für Studenten. http://www.degum.de/angebote-fuer/studenten.html

  12. Bernardi V, Ville Y, Chalouhi GE (2014) Ultrasound simulators in obstetrics and gynecology: state of the art. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014, Oct 27. doi:10.1002/uog.14707

  13. Merz E, Meinel K, Bald R et al (2004) DEGUM III guideline for level II ultrasound examinations at 11 to 14 weeks gestation (in German). Ultraschall Med 25:299–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peyton JWR (1998) Teaching and learning in medical practice. In: Peyton JWR (ed) The learning cycle. Manticore Europe Limited, Rickmansworth, pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weyrich P, Schultz JH, Buss SJ et al (2011) Effects of Peyton’s four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skills training: a controlled trial. Teach Learn Med 23:244–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC, Grannum PA (1979) The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133:915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman G (2015) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Prac 15:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schultz SM, Sehgal CM, Cary TW, Aronchick J, Arger PH (2005) Teaching medical students diagnostic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 24:1365–1369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friederichs H, Lenz P, Schmedt A et al (2013) Teaching ultrasound in a curricular course according to certified EFSUMB standards during undergraduate medical education: a prospective study. BMC Med Educ 13:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nickel C, O’Reilly M, Kafka H et al (2014) Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Searle RF, Swamy M (2012) Anatomy teaching with portable ultrasound to medical students. BMC Med Educ 12:99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zwirner K, Lischner U, Bauder M et al (2012) Student tutors are able to teach basic sonographic anatomy effectively: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ultraschall Med 33:141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kroemer K, Strehl R, Albrecht M (2013) Finanzierung der Universitätsmedizin: an der Grenze der Belastbarkeit. Dtsch Ärztebl 110:A-65/B-60/C-60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verband der Universitätsklinika Deutschlands e.V. http://www.uniklinika.de/

  25. Monod C, Voekt CA, Gisin M, Gisin S, Hoesli IM (2014) Optimization of competency in obstetrical emergencies: a role for simulation training. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(4):733–738. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3111-6 (epub 2013 Dec 18)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of the paper would like to thank the committee of the Teach-the-Teacher program for inspiring us to improve the standard of medical education. We also would like to thank all the students for submitting their feedback that lead to the accomplishment of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hamza.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study and manuscript were funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saarland.

Ethical approval

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamza, A., Solomayer, E.F., Takacs, Z. et al. Introduction of basic obstetrical ultrasound screening in undergraduate medical education. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 479–485 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-4002-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-4002-9

Keywords

Navigation