Skip to main content
Log in

AMH trend after laparoscopic cystectomy and ovarian suturing in patients with endometriomas

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy with suturing in patients with endometriomas.

Methods

A total of 80 women with unilateral or bilateral endometriomas underwent laparoscopic cystectomy using sutures for hemostasis after the excision of ovarian cysts. Serum levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH) and FSH were measured at the day 3 of menstrual cycles preoperatively, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

In the bilateral endometrioma group, serum AMH level decreased significantly from the baseline (4.68 ± 2.87 ng/ml) to 6 months (3.05 ± 1.99 ng/ml) and 12 months (2.26 ± 1.88 ng/ml) postoperatively, whereas the FSH level increased significantly from baseline to 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Those patients with unilateral endometriomas also had lower levels of AMH in 6 and 12 months after operation. When compared between unilateral and bilateral endometrioma group, the rate of AMH decline 6 and 12 months and the rate of FSH increase 12 months postoperatively reached statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The changes of the AMH and FSH values suggest that the ovarian reserve is obviously reduced in spite of suturing technology used as a method of hemostasis after stripping ovarian endometriomas, especially in those with bilateral cysts. The protective effect of the ovarian suturing for ovarian reserve may be marginal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dan H, Limin F (2013) Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration/coagulation or laser vaporization for the treatment of endometriomas: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gynecol Obstet Invest 76(2):75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart R, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W, Garry R (2005) Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata: a Cochrane Review. Hum Reprod 20:3000–3007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Busacca M, Vignali M (2008) Endometrioma excision and ovarian reserve: a dangerous relation. J Minim Invasive Gynecool 16:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bergamini V, Berlanda N (2004) Bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture of solitary ovary after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 11:344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li CZ, Liu B, Wen ZQ, Sun Q (2009) The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: a prospective clinical study of 191 patients. Fertil Steril 92:1428–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seifer DB, Maclaughlin DT (2007) Mullerian inhibiting substance is an ovarian growth factor of emerging clinical significance. Fertil Steril 88:539–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, Kramer P, Fauser BC, Themmen AP (2004) Anti-Mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 10:77–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutson J, Ikawa H, Donahoe PK (1981) The ontogeny of Mullerian inhibiting substance in the gonads of the chicken. J Pediatr Surg 16:822–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang HJ, Han H, Lee JR, Jee BC, Lee BI, Suh CS, Kim SH (2010) Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 94:343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raffi F, Metwally M, Amer S (2012) The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(9):3146–3154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrero S, Venturini PL, Gillott DJ, Remorgida V, Leone Roberti Maggiore U (2012) Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture after surgical stripping of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Min Inv Gynecol 19:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwu YM, Wu FS, Li SH, Sun FJ, Lin MH, Lee RK (2011) The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9:80

  13. Urman B, Alper E, Yakin K, Oktem O, Aksoy S, Alatas C, Mercan R, Ata B (2013) Removal of unilateral endometriomas is associated with immediate and sustained reduction in ovarian reserve. Reprod Biomed Online 27:212–216

  14. Ercan CM, Sakinci M, Duru NK, Alanbay I, Karasahin KE, Baser I (2010) Antimullerian hormone levels after laparoscopic endometrioma stripping surgery. Gynecol Endocrinol 26:468–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alper E, Oktem O, Palaoglu E, Peker K, Yakin K, Urman B (2009) The impact of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve as assessed by antral follicle count and serum AMH levels. Fertil Steril 92:S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Biacchiardi CP, Piane LD, Camanni M, Deltetto F, Delpiano EM, Marchino GL, Gennarelli G, Revelli A (2011) Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas negatively affects ovarian follicular reserve even if performed by experienced surgeons. Reprod Biomed Online 23(6):740–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alborzi S, Foroughinia L, Kumar PV, Asadi N, Alborzi S (2009) A comparison of histopathologic findings of ovarian tissue inadvertently excised with endometrioma and other kinds of benign ovarian cyst in patients undergoing laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 92:2004–2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Donnez J, Lousse JC, Jadoul P, Donnez O, Squifflet J (2010) Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril 94:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsolakidis D, Pados G, Vavilis D, Athanatos D, Tsalikis T, Giannakou A, Tarlatzis BC (2010) The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage management inpatients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 94:71–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saeki A, Matsumoto T, Ikuma K, Tanase Y, Inaba F, Oku H, Kuno A (2010) The vasopressin injection technique for laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma: a technique to reduce the use of coagulation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:176–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agostini A, De Lapparent T, Collette E, Capelle M, Cravello L, Blanc B (2007) In situ methotrexate injection for treatment of recurrent endometriotic cysts. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:129–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh CL, Shiau CS, Lo LM, Hsieh TT, Chang MY (2009) Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy with 95 % ethanol for treatment of recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Fertil Steril 91:2709–2713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Jun Shao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, MJ., Hu, M., He, YQ. et al. AMH trend after laparoscopic cystectomy and ovarian suturing in patients with endometriomas. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 1049–1052 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3926-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3926-4

Keywords

Navigation